This often results in excessive recidivism. A teenager who has made an impulsive, fateful mistake deserves more opportunity to make changes-- and has greater potential for change than a hardened, lifelong adult criminal. Studies in 2000 by social researcher Eric Jensen suggest that those juveniles “who were unfortunate enough to be sent to adult courts showed 18% more recidivism as compared to their juvenile-sentenced peers” (Jensen 47). Juvenile facilities have a greater emphasis on education for all, more support groups and counseling, more job training programs, and more success keeping young people from returning to prison later in life (“Kids in Prison: A Study”). Statistics and research provide a strong prescription for the juvenile system, and its use in these cases can improve society through rehabilitation of young offenders. Though it may emotionally satisfy some, punishing teenaged criminals in the same way their parents would be punished is not a wise or moral choice in society today. New knowledge about the brain coupled with research on recidivism in these cases points society away from this model, revealing it to be antiquated. Society needs a plan of action that works as these crimes increase, rather than an investment in an outdated …show more content…
The Teenaged Brain in Motion. New York: Harper, 2009. Print.
“Kids in Prison: A Study.” Human Rights Watch. n.p., 2008. Web. 2 Nov. 2010. .
Mears, Robert. “An Account of Differences: Adults and Teens.” Newsweek Online. Newsweek Publishing, 10 Apr. 2009. Web. 2 November 2010. .
“Penalties Differ in Courts.” U.S. Government Justice Online. U.S. Department of Justice, n.d. Web. 9 Nov. 2010. .
State Farm Online. State Farm Insurance, 2010. Web. 8 Nov. 2010.