Pros And Cons Of Act Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
There are twelve different versions of utilitarianism. Six versions of act utilitarianism and six versions of rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is if a person’s act is morally right, but it is only right if it results/ produces the best possible outcome for that situation. While rule utilitarianism is that an action is right as long as it conforms to a rule which is for the greatest good. Generic utilitarians do not have set answer for what is intrinsically good or bad. They think that the best or right decision to make is whichever holds the most positive result. While the hedonistic utilitarians are set to the view that only happiness/unhappiness is intrinsically good/bad. They think that the right thing to do is whichever brings the …show more content…
Act utilitarianism are things that are in the instant, situational things and things that bring happiness. Actual consequence generic act utilitarianism aren’t just actions that will bring you only joy or pleasure. You can still be in a bad situation and choose the option that will cause you the least amount of pain and the least amount of bad consequences. It looks at the intrinsic goodness/ badness of situations/ things. Intrinsic goodness are things that are worthwhile because there are good in themselves that are not good because they lead to other good things. Same thing with things that are intrinsically bad, they are bad in themselves not because they lead to other bad things. When trying to decide what action to do, actual consequence generic act utilitarians believe that we should do the thing or side with the thing that is the most morally right, we should do the thing that will bring us the most happiness/pleasure or the least amount of unhappiness with the least amount of consequences. They believe that we should do whatever is the most morally right thing to …show more content…
Then one day the Nazi’s come to your door and ask if you have any jews or if any are hiding in your house. It’s not right to lie but it’s also not right to be truthful and give the jews up just so you don’t feel bad about lying because giving the jews up is a lot worse than lying about having them. So you lie and say that there are no jews in your house and you have not seen any. In this situation actual consequence generic act utilitarians evaluate the situation in the moment and think of all the consequences, the intrinsically good/bad things, and all the morals they should be following. All the actual consequences that could happen if they lie is that the Nazi’s could choose not to believe them and come in anyway and find the jew’s they were hiding and killing/ torture everyone, they could just kill the jew’s or take them and send the harborers to a jail. If they choose not to lie, the Nazi’s would still come in and take the jew’s and could kill everyone or just take them and leave. The intrinsic good in this is that they are helping hiding the jew’s just because they finding that helping others is good in themselves and it is morally right to help save innocent people that have no valid reason to be treated like the. The intrinsic bad is the Nazi’s and Hitler for starting the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The theory of Utilitarianism is very vulnerable to criticism due to its reliance on vague underlying principles that leave many questions unanswered. The Utilitarianism ideology is grounded in three simple propositions. First off, actions are solely deemed right if they result in the best consequences. Secondly, the only way consequences are assessed are by how much happiness and unhappiness they cause.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It does not rely on a higher power to determine what right or wrong but rather it relies on actual outcomes is. Utilitarianism also opposes egoism, or the pursuit of self-interest. Utilitarianism says that one should not consider just one’s self when…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s well being trumps all moral responsibilities, if a person has to steal food to eat then by utilitarianist standards this person is being morally correct despite his obvious theft. This is advantage to the ideology as it allows for a greater sense of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Preference Utilitarian Peter Singer maintains that it is a moral wrong for those in affluent countries to not do more to prevent starvation in other parts of the world. Singer formulates this argument in his paper ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. Singer argues from the side of consequentialism, in particular Utilitarianism; an ethical philosophy in which the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society is considered the greatest good. Several philosophers have countered Singer’s theory, claiming that our moral duties are lessened by the distance of those suffering in other parts of the world. Moreover, critics of consequentialism argue that it does not allow agents to act in accordance with their own needs.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is the idea that "moral action should be about producing happiness in the world, the more happiness it produces, the better it is" (Garcia, Slide 6). The idea of Utilitarianism can be broken down into two forms; One being Act Utilitarianism and the second being Rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism is when "an act is morally right just because it maximizes overall well-being, or at least is expected to" (Garcia, Slide 6), while Rule Utilitarianism is when "actions are morally right just because they would be required by social rules that are created to promote overall well-being" (Garcia, Slide 6). In addition to Utilitarianism's break down it has a moral standard that is true to both forms, known as the Principle of Utility.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although rule utilitarianism is better than act utilitarianism in this regard, it faces other problems regarding exceptional scenarios. According to rule utilitarianism, there are certain moral rules we are obligated to follow like to always tell the truth. In most situations following moral rules maximizes good outcomes, however in certain scenarios this is not necessarily the case. A possible…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism In Lying

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When a friend constantly tells me, I look “gorgeous and you’re not fat”. However, in reality, I am self-conscious and I gained a lot of weight. This is a lie, the reason she tells me this is because she wants to help boost my confidence and not hurt my feelings. She knows that I am self-conscious about my appearance. Nevertheless, hearing it constantly doesn’t help me, but makes me feel more self-conscious of my body and hurts my emotions.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolutionary United Front (RUF) had also kidnapped the young kids and trains them to become the child soldiers. They brainwash the young kids to be joining as member of them with the promised of they will protected under the RUF. The villagers in Sierra Leone had live in turmoil. The issue was portrayed when the Solomon Vandy having a good time with his son, Dia Vandy.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism states that good is what brings the most happiness to people. Mill also believes that people are not satisfied with just physical pleasures, but they strive to achieve pleasure of the mind as well. There are two main types of utilitarianism including act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of specific actions of a human person in a particular situation and rule utilitarianism suggests that the principle of utility can be used to generate and test rules can be employed is similar situations. The assumption is that if we follow a set of rules that give us the best consequences our actions will result in the greater good for everyone around us.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The hedonic principle is when morality is judged by this theory by the amount of aggregate pleasure or happiness and the least aggregate pain or unhappiness an act produces, the more morally admirable it is. Consequentialism is when the consequences of an action are used to calculate its moral worth. The better the consequences, the more moral worth the act…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Utilitarian and Deontological Discussion of Abortion Today, abortion has become a heavily debated topic whether socially or politically since the medical procedure was voted legal by the Supreme Court over 40 years ago. It is defined as the purposeful termination of a pregnancy before a normal childbirth (Abortion: Get Facts About the Procedure and Statistics). Whether you find yourself agreeing with it or not, many people have something to say. Abortion is very controversial because of the discussion whether or not a fetus is a person. Many wonder if there is a morally relevant point at some duration throughout the pregnancy or development of the fetus that could justify having an abortion or possibly not having an abortion.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each theory tries to help people figure out what actions are morally right and which ones are wrong. There are two types of utilitarianism- extreme and restricted. According to extreme utilitarianism, when it comes to a moral problem, a person’s intentions are irrelevant. Rather than looking at the rightness or wrongness of someone’s actions, extreme utilitarianism looks at the consequences of an action.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is a feature of consequentialism, which tells that the results of action are the only benchmark. The consequentialism can be differentiated with virtue ethics which holds virtue as a moral good. Utilitarianism proponents have been broken about whether individual acts should conform to utility. Whether utility should be calculated as aggregate or average must be…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays