Miranda Rights Argumentative Analysis

Great Essays
“No freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way harmed, nor will we go upon him nor will we send upon him, except by the legal judgement of his peers or by the law of the land” (The Magna Carta). Clause thirty-nine of the Magna Carta, written in 1215, establishes Western society 's desire for equal and fair representation in regards to the legal system. When the Founding Fathers of the United States of America were forming the Constitution, fair representation, for white males, was of great importance. This is a continuing theme throughout the ever-developing American society and can be seen in the amendments made to the Constitution. The 1966 Supreme Court decision of Miranda v. Arizona under Chief Justice …show more content…
Arizona established rights to protect a suspect from self-incrimination whilst in police custody and interrogation. However, far too often, suspects are coerced into releasing information they otherwise would not. This is often due to the vague wording of the Miranda Rights; “a voluntary, freely given, intelligent, and knowing confession” (Miranda). The 1991 Supreme Court case of Arizona v. Fulminate further illuminates the issues regarding the ambiguity of the Miranda Rights. Oreste Fulminante was incarcerated in a New York federal prison for possessing a weapon that was provided to him by a known felon. The police suspected that he had murdered his eleven year old daughter, but they had no evidence to convict him of this crime. Whilst in prison, Fulminante befriended Anthony Sarivola, a former police officer. Sarivola was an informant for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and gained Fulminante’s confession to his daughter 's murder, which was then used to convict him. The Supreme Court upheld that the confession was coerced and therefore could not be used to incriminate Fulminante. The Supreme Court used the precedents presented in Bram v. United States, Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, and Chapman v. California to decide the outcome of Arizona v. Fulminate (Arizona). The ambiguous wording of the Miranda Rights could possibly lead to a guilty man walking

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda warning that arose from the U.S. Supreme Court's Miranda v. Arizona decision assures that officers assure that those arrested are aware of their rights that protect against self-incrimination prior to any questioning. The ruling in Miranda does fulfill the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination and protects against the pressures of authority. The Miranda rights fulfills the legal tradition of the promise against self-incrimination because they protect against wrongful punishment and torture employed by authorities. Authorities can abuse their power in order to gain info or prove their suspicions correct.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The statement was a typed paragraph stating that he had made confession voluntarily, without threats or promises of immunity from the police. The document also contained that he had full knowledge of his legal rights and that he understood that any statement he made could be used against him. He was allegedly charge with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda had a history of serious mental instability and unfortunately had no counsel present. At his first trial, the prosecution 's case consisted…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He appealed his case all the way up to the Supreme Court, claiming that the confession had been obtained unconstitutionally. The Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution could not use Miranda’s confession as evidence because the police had not informed Miranda of his right to an attorney and his right against…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the time of the debate on Miranda rules police officers are put in an…

    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even in cases where rights have been waived according to the standards of the Miranda decision, it is still possible for a confession to be deemed coerced. Subsequent case law has ruled that continuing to speak to police after being informed of one’s right not to is an implicit waiving of the right to remain silent, and that not explicitly requesting an attorney is an implicit waiving of that right as well. Even so, confessions…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arizona (1966). This decision, generally speaking, defined the rights of the accused after an appeal was made on behalf of Ernesto Miranda. It said, among other things, that each person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (Document 7). The tradition of these Miranda rights has become common knowledge in American society, despite the fact that some people believe that they are generally too lenient and often hamper the justice system’s ability to convict guilty criminals of their crimes (Documents 5a & 5b). The Supreme Court has failed to see adequate need for reversal of this decision, despite the dramatic odds that lie in favour of the accused as a result of the decision, and the fact that the victim is often left without help when the offender is not convicted.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2012 Dbq Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, the government made more considerable efforts to reshape American democratic ideals. During this time, the government had the ability to enact changes as reactions to the objectives of other groups seeking to redefine these ideas, however, it often recognized the lack of social and economic equality for all groups and approached reform during this era broadly so that many minority groups became democratically equal to the majority. For example, many politicians recognized the need for new policies and thus directed their political agenda to conceiving and instituting such legislation. According to Robert F. Kennedy in his speech announcing his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President, he recognized that the United…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most crucial U.S. Supreme Court cases ever held in the United States. The case causes the Supreme Court to redefine law enforcement procedures before interrogations. The decision that was reached by the Supreme Court addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. All of these cases are similar in the fact that there was a custodial interrogation where the suspect was not properly informed of his constitutional rights to remain silent and have a presence of an attorney. Additionally, in all of the cases besides Stewart v. California, the conviction was affirmed without any belief that there was a violation of constitutional rights ("Facts and Case").…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Your miranda rights can hurt your case but they can also help. Ernesto Arturo Miranda March 9, 1941 January 31, 1976 was a laborer whose conviction on…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda vs Arizona In the years following Miranda v. Arizona, many changes were made to the verdict. The Omnibus Crime and Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 declared that if a suspect voluntarily confessed to a crime within six hours after his or her arrest, this confession could be used as valid evidence in a trial, even if the suspect had not been informed of his or her Miranda rights. The passage of this act was one of the first major modifications to the initial decision. Additionally, there were many other cases that followed Miranda v. Arizona that altered the Miranda decision.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fare V. Arizona 1979

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The police told him they could not get ahold of him and he had the right to an attorney. After further discussion regarding the attorney and probation officer, Michael C. stated, “Yeah I want to talk to you" and made incriminating statements and sketches (Page 442 U. S. 711). The issue at hand is not whether the statements were voluntary, but rather, was his request to see his probation officer a per se invocation of his Fifth Amendment rights, and did the California Supreme Court interpret Miranda to broadly? The California Supreme Court previously…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While in interrogation Miranda wrote a confession claiming that he was making the “statement voluntarily and of my own free will, with no threats, coercion, or promises of immunity, and with full knowledge of my legal rights, understanding any…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The infringement of Miranda’s rights by the police granted Miranda the right to appeal and challenge the verdict rendered in the initial case. On appeal, Miranda’s lawyer pointed out how the police failed in their role of informing Miranda of his right to remain silent, the right to be represented by a lawyer, and anything he says can be used against him in a court of law. The landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in 1966 pivoted in favor of the defendant by a majority ruling of 5 – 4. The broad ruling held the police at fault for not exercising proper principles of interrogation, highlighting the need for law enforcement officers to make specific points clear to a suspect before questioning (Bloom…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ernesto Miranda had confessed to authorities without prior knowledge of his ability to have an attorney present during questioning and was later convicted. The Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be given the right to remain silent prior to questioning. Therefore, the court overturned Miranda’s…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “ Requiring adherence to the Miranda warning and the exclusionary rule actually makes the police more careful and thus more likely to sustain a case and secure a…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays