Emerson's View Of Nature In Emerson Vs. Thoreau

Register to read the introduction… They believed that nature is changing and people must know the reason why it is changing because nature changes accordingly to the society. According to Emerson's (1834) observation " human do not entirely understand natures beauty and all the things that nature has to offer us. He further state that people are uncertain by the humankind around them and human must take themselves away from societies flaw and diversion in order to experience the unity with nature for which they are naturally suited". Nature gives human a lot but human do not give in return and they believed that many people need to be separated from the rest of the world because they can see the real nature of the people and how society is changing. According to Conor (30 June 2009) states that "To go into isolation, a man needs to retire from his chamber and he further states that if a man would be alone let him look at the storts". The person must let nature to catch people because society can destroy humans unity and in order to let the nature and society to be together nature and human must create a equal relationship because nature is prior to every leaving beings. Nature and human benefits each other in many ways and this relationship shows that to some extend that human makes strength out of nature and accept it as the universal being. Nature is not permanent or solution to a …show more content…
They believes that nature to be the most important element on the earth which goes beyond human knowledge and also understanding nature as oneself. They mostly agree that those image which represents nature are the ways to make human understand the deep meaning of existence and also to make people know what is going around them. According to Thoreau(1834) states that “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived. He further states that I did not wish to live what was not life, living is dear, nor did I wish to practice resignation, unless it was quite necessary”. This shows that they are loyal and they need to peove truth of their society to the people. So that is why they started to learn from nature in order to show the true color of their society. They also says that if the life of an individual is controlled by somebody than that particular person is not living a happy life and they also says that if a person works day and night for their family and even its not enough in their life than it makes the person to wonder. According to Thoreau (1834) states that, “most men, even in this comparatively free country, though mere ignorance and mistake, are so …show more content…
They regards that our own thoughts and action towards the society can make the world worth living on earth. And if this two things are fulfilled then they believed that one can gain own respects in the