What Is The Path To The American Revolution

Improved Essays
The path to independence for American Rebels would not be an easy one. From the view of militaries, many historians rank the British army as one of the best in the world. How could a motley crew of misfit, part time American soldiers take down this enemy? Three ideas can help understand how America could stand up against the British regulars and win their freedom. One such idea would be French help. Without their assistance, this war probably would have ended earlier and nothing would have been accomplished. Also, winning key battles helped the militia win the war and shock the world. Finally, British experience during the war would eventually force Britain to surrender and bring success to America. Even though this does not cover everything, …show more content…
From Lexington and Concord up until Saratoga, the Americans had to fight the British on their own. By 1776, according to Ferling, France began to take interest in the war and began to secretly help the Rebels fight the British. Why would the French do this? Perhaps to seek revenge for the loss of the French and Indian War would be a reason why they helped. Regardless, this decision, in return, would help the American army to continue to fight for their cause. In a letter from George Washington to John Hancock, Washington had mentioned that he had taken items that he and his troops felt would be beneficial to them to continue to fight. From Bullets to keep the enemy at bay, and blankets to help keep his men warm with the changing of the season, Washington was desperate to remain in this revolution. Supplies were very important to this general, but they do not do them any good if he had no men to fight. Washington expands in his letter that many of his men were ill and could not fight. Manpower is important in combat. With a lack of people, it was only time before he would have to surrender. It would take more to win, and help was needed from allies to win this war. In the Treaty of Alliance with France, art. 11 …show more content…
They would be facing off against one of the best trained militaries of the world. Just because the British Regulars were a harden, experienced group, did not mean that that they were not beatable. To win this war, battles had to be won; American victories and close victories gave them the hope that they could win this war. Bunker Hill, technically not a victory for freedom, was a starting point. According to Ferling, Bunker Hill was a very bloody battle that the British eventually won, it proved to the Rebels that they were capable of going toe to toe with the dominate force. It “Instilled the colonists with confidence.” Sureness changed the attitude of the Americans and made it possible for them to compete in this war. Even though America would continue to lose battles, Trenton-Princeton added victories to the American side. Mentioned by Ferling, these battles, “Restored American Morale.” This morale allowed the underdog to continue to fight. In fact, Ferling explained the battle got the attention of France, and that they would help and eventually enter the war. Following Saratoga, it was almost inevitable that America would

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The defeat of Great Britain at the hands of American forces in the Revolutionary War presents an interesting question of how colonial forces were able to overcome superior forces in conventional, face-to-face encounters. The British army was, unquestionably, superior in military skill and classical tactics to the American regulars. They were extremely disciplined and very proud. The redcoats also held the advantage of superior leadership and a strong chain of command. Overconfidence in themselves, and the difficulty of fighting so far from the mother country were, perhaps, their downfall.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To start with, Britain did not want to start a war with the US but the actions that the British Navy had taken pushed the US into declaring war on Britain to stop the attacks on American shipping. Britain was already at war with France, but perceived it as an opportunity to join sides with the native people in an effort to win back control of the loyal colonist. Consequently at the end of the war, both territories were mutually restored so nothing really had changed. American shipping was resumed and it gave recognition to America as being a powerful nation as well as clarifying to the politicians in America that having a standing Army and Navy was significant in playing a major role on the world stage. In the end it could be considered that is was morally victorious rather than physically.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By taking a different approach to the shore, there would be a different ending to the battle. Instead, He led his troops in a choke point; they stood no chance against General Jackson’s cannons. America as we know today would be very different if Great Britain won the battle, the nation would not be a democracy. On the other hand, this battle showed with great leadership anything could be accomplished.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plus, when they proceeded to attack the British troops, as the British “could scarcely believe their eyes” (McCullough 185), ended up winning this battle.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The alliance of the French facilitated the colonists winning the war by imparting them with money, provisions, and military…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lexington And Concord

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Leaked intelligence from a source inside the British high command was the main reasons the Colonial Militiamen were able to win the Battles of Lexington and Concord. The Colonial Militiamen were given advance notice that the British troops would march to Concord; they were able to have an advantage in mobilizing to intercept the Redcoat…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revolutionary War Dbq

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Britain had some of the best weapons, and was excellently trained for war. Even though Britain was in debt from each battle, they lived safely and securely. In fact, more than a third of the colonists living in America were still very loyal to Britain. The Americans were far more unstable than the British were and their states were not yet unified. The American army was badly supported, supplied, trained and paid.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mission Command Principles

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although the Colonials did not physically win the Battle of Bunker Hill, Colonel Prescott’s leadership…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For the rest of the war they would use the same guerrilla tactics that had helped them to defeat the French.” Smith’s statement about this battle shows that it would have been the largest mistake of the war and by definition would have no successes attributed to it. This is because it created the enemy that the US was unable to destroy because of the tactics that they themselves forced the enemy into…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Great Britain’s joint operations in New York and the South during the War of American independence were strategic failures because she misinterpreted the nature of the war and falsely assumed the support of widespread loyalists in the American colonies, especially in the south. (Carpenter, lecture) The lack of strategic coherence throughout the campaigns coupled with governmental misperception and the inability to cut off the American supply support added to the failure as well. The initial assignment was to end the rebellion and restore the American colonies to their allegiance to the crown. (Fisher, p. 73) The British were accustomed to frequent rebellions in Scotland and Ireland and approached the rebellion in the colonies with a similar…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.What were Thomas Paine’s views on government? How did his writing convince colonists to fight for independence? Thomas Paine’s views on government, as he said in his pamphlet “Common Sense”, was that all people had the right to have a choice in government and all decisions that came from it. He called for the formation of a republic, where power came from the people and not from a corrupt monarch. Paine’s writing convinced colonists to fight for independence because it pointed out all the wrongdoings of Britain.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But washington complained about those three people, he didn’t like them. He couldn’t do anything about it, so he just accepted it. George Washington fought to keep his job of being commander in…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The French helped the Americans win the war in many ways. With guns, money, and extra troops and…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1-The American enlightenment was a development to organize the human limit for a reason as the most elevated type of human accomplishment. The most conspicuous of the Enlightenment thinkers were John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau. This ideas inspired both harmony and conflict with religious leaders. Settlements faced off regarding how the Enlightenment idea of “natural rights” may impact their activities as pilgrims under the tenet of the British crown. Also America’s first college, Harvard was founded in 1636 and nine colleges were founded during the colonial period.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (143) With that being said, they have more reason to fight for their own home, rather than by someone else’s home. American soldiers enjoyed independence and liberty, but they lacked standards and rules which help regulate themselves in war. They left camp when they felt like it, they shot guns when they wanted to, without order, and they could not be trusted. (144) The British, on the other hand, were disciplined and very well trained. They had their values set for the army and they had the standards of men who were to fight for honor.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays