Utilitarianism In The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas

Improved Essays
Utilitarianism is a theory that places the condition of right or wrong for an action or policy solely based on the outcome or consequences that result from it. A distinction between this theory and others is that it moves beyond the scope of one’s own interests and takes into account the interests of others. Contrary to popular belief, utilitarianism is not about providing the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people, but rather providing the greatest ratio of happiness to unhappiness in a society. In Ursula Le Guin’s story, “The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas” she describes a place where most people are happy, a utilitarian’s dream. However, the catch is, that there is a child who is locked up and must endure suffering and …show more content…
She portrays that although these people are happy, they realize that violating one’s unalienable rights to achieve this is morally wrong, therefore making them unhappy. If one could measure happiness in units and put that on a scale from one to ten, then utilitarians would argue that it is best to maximize the overall utility or happiness of a society. In other words, if there were five people in the society and all five of them were at a six, they would rather have four of those people rise to a ten while one of the members drops down to a one. This means that in order to increase the total utility they had to harm one person and violate their …show more content…
If everyone acted in a way to achieve the greatest possible amount of happiness for everyone then we would be living in a utopian society. A problem that I found with the story of Omelas was that while the people wanted to have a society with the highest amount of utility possible, they found a way to achieve it that was too easy. Rather than making governmental policy changes to ensure that everyone lived a happy life, the rulers of that society thought it would be easiest to inflict a great amount of pain on one person so that others would seem happier by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tellishment Argument

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the moral theory of utilitarianism? According to Vaughn, “[Utilitarianism is] the view that right actions are those that result in the greatest overall happiness for everyone involved” (Vaughn, 79). At face value such a moral theory sounds great, because it should promote general happiness. While this is true, a particular argument, the telishment argument, shows that utilitarianism is not a viable moral theory because it promotes decisions that run contrary to historical moral inclinations. To prove this is the case, this paper will first dive into what happiness means in the utilitarian sense, the telishment argument itself, what points of contention the tellishment argument brings up against utilitarianism, and finally, what utilitarianism has to say in its own defense.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This question, posed by “The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas”, is a troublesome one, however, more troublesome is the knowledge of what most of us would choose. Personally, I feel that I live in comfort compared to many other parts of the world, as, I feel, are most others in our country. So, to help those who are in desperate need would force us to leave our “paradise”, which very few people are willing to do. In “The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas”, there are only a few people who even see anything wrong with torturing a child for “…their happiness, the beauty of their city, the tenderness of their friendships, the health of their children, the wisdom of their scholars, the skill of their makers, even the abundance of their harvest and the kindly weathers of their skies…” all of which they believe “…depend wholly on this child's abominable misery” (Le Guin 245). In this story, however, we see something different; we see sympathy, there is actual disgust shown by members of the community because they find the deplorable state that this child lives in to be, well, deplorable.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery and Ursula LeGuin’s The Ones Who Walk Way Away From Omelas”, there is a society that is considered to be a Utopian society that takes extremes to make things easier for themselves. Despite the slight contrasts in Jackson and LeGuin's works, both authors have a common theme throughout their stories: The Power Of Sacrifice Although the power of sacrifice is the main theme, the main effects of the power of sacrifice are just as important. Guilt, one of the main effects of the theme, is an underlying tone in both short stories. In the story The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas, a small child is taken from his home and forced to handle all of the sorrow, pain, and hatred from the citizens so that they may live better lives.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ursula Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” is a great example of how inequality is often present, yet ignored, in our society. Like the citizens of Omelas, most people think that it’s okay, or rather necessary, for one person to suffer for the greater good. In our case, the one person who suffers is not actually a person. It is, in fact, a group of people who’s suffering is constantly being ignored. Le Guin uses the child in "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas" to demonstrate the line of thinking that: as long as a few people are happy, the suffering of one is okay.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Ursula LeGuin’s story, The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, it tells the story of a perfect society, Omelas, that’s happiness thrives on the suffering of a person. Omelas is a perfect society, there is no crime, everyone has a job, everyone has a good amount of money, it is the definition of perfect. The problem with Omelas is that the happiness of the entire society depends on the suffering of a person who lives in a closet in the basement. Even though the person is suffering, no one will try and help it because they do not want to sacrifice their perfect society. The speaker says, “To exchange all the goodness and grace of every life in Omelas for that single, small improvement: to throw away the happiness of thousands for the chance of the happiness of one: that would be to let guilt within the walls within” (pg 2).…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One way she achieves this by bringing to light the irony behind the concept of the pursuit of happiness. Viktor Frankl put it more eloquently when he said, “It’s the very pursuit of happiness that thwarts happiness” (Smith, E., 2013). People who seek a happy life end up spending most of their time pursuing it instead of actually being happy in the present moment. Smith even goes as far as to point out that: from a social perspective, the pursuit of happiness is associated with selfish behavior—[being] a “taker” rather than a “giver.” The psychologists [explain] happiness is about drive reduction.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is interesting because it takes primarily a consequentialist approach to ethic looking at the ends to something and looks at the pros or cons of an action, or what causes the most happiness versus the amount of generating pain from an action. Even though it sounds simple to compare the amount of happiness versus pain the equation that we have to use for utilitarianism does not always work the that it should and other flaws that we will go over in this essay taking an unusual stance on the matter, questioning the utility monster but also criticizes utilitarianism later but also saying that it is the best that we have currently have. The idea of a utility monster is not a valid objection against utilitarianism and can be worked…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is one of the persuasive approaches to ethics in the history of philosophy. It is widely used by everyone on a daily basis but has barely gotten recognition it deserves. Utilitarianism was founded in Ancient Greece but was not popularly used until the 19th century when it was re-introduced by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. While both men are credited as two of the most influential people in the foundation of, what we now consider, ethical theory. The approach in which we utilize the theory to make decisions is different from each other.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative moral approach to ethics that tries to maximise the pleasure and minimises the amount of pain in given a situation. John Stuart Mill analysis the principle of Utility, Utility meaning ‘happiness’. Mill often thought it was important that in any given situation that happiness is supposed to continue to be uplifted (Mill, 1864 p.9). Mill examines, that happiness is the ultimate end in which every human lives their life to, and so anything has to be a means for that end to happen (Mill, 1864 p.52). In linguistic terms, it can be described as a “’theory of usefulness’”…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays