Robert Jackson Influences

Great Essays
Robert Jackson was a small town New Yorker who rose to the status of a distinguished lawyer, and later became one of the greatest Solicitor Generals. Narrowly missing the appointment of Chief Justice, Jackson was the final associate justice appointed by President Roosevelt. Jackson welcomed the role of a Supreme Court Justice, and developed a practical view of the constitution. Jackson’s main influence to the court came from the Nuremburg trials, in which he was the chief United States prosecutor. After his time abroad came to an end, Jackson used his knowledge from Nuremburg and “Europe to shape American constitutional law” (332). Jackson usually did not recuse himself from many postwar cases, and used his knowledge from Nuremberg in his decisions. In one of the most monumental cases of the FDR court, Brown vs. Board, Jackson declared “if noncitizens held …show more content…
After the death of Roosevelt, the relationships and ideas of FDR’s justices diverged. In part, due to a series of unfortunate events, such as the Republicans taking back the Senate and House, the weak Harry Truman in office, and numerous personal frustrations, contempt bred rapidly among the justices (306). Where once bonds held these men together, the justices became bitter enemies. While none of the justices were actual “friends,” camps, or alliances, seemed to form on the bench. On one side were Justices Frankfurter and Jackson, the other Justices Black and Douglas. The justices did not keep their opinions of one another to themselves. Justice Frankfurter dubbed Justices Douglas, Black, and Murphy “the axis,” while Douglas nicknamed Frankfurter “Der Fuehrer” (306). The many vendettas and “friendships” amongst the men may have very well influenced voting behavior on the bench, out of either spite or alliance

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    At the end of this trial, Taney decided that, since Scott is African American and technically not a citizen in the United States, he cannot sue the Caucasian man. From this, Taney made a pro slavery ruling, which was basically that Blacks are not considered citizens of United States, and have no rights. Although this was an unfair decision, this ruling made Taney very prominent because of his brilliance of a…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson also emphasizes the important role Clay played in brokering the compromise as well as the importance of maintaining the political balance. Jackson expands upon some of the ideas Forbes presented when dealing with the Dred Scott decision, for example elaborating on the preceding of the case and also the influence of the case on the belief that the black man was inferior. She also agrees with Forbes, that when looking at the story of America, it is important that the contradiction slavery and the foundation of liberty be examined. When looking at The Missouri Compromise and Its Aftermath: Slavery and the Meaning of America and “Dred Scott v. Sandford: a prelude to the civil war”, both authors come to similar conclusions, the most obvious of which is the effect of the Dred Scott on the idea of African inferiority as well as it’s importance as a causative event for the American Civil…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall served as chief judge from 1801 to 1835, and he was the greatest dominance to the Supreme Court that there was no judge can compare. At the outset of his tenure Judge, Supreme Court asserted its power by declaring an Act of Parliament was unconstitutional, that case was Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Marshall's decision in the dilemma seems no escape showed natural talent of his absolute. Marshall declared Section 13 of Act 1789 of Justice is unconstitutional because it empowered instance trial for the Supreme Court beyond the provisions in Article III of the Constitution. Thus, the power of the Supreme Court was reconsidered and decided the congressional legislation was unconstitutional had been set.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an elegant act of “judicial jujitsu,” the Supreme Court issued its decision in Marbury v. Madison on February 24, 1803, establishing the high court’s power of judicial review. The dramatic tale begins with the presidential election of 1800, in which President John Adams, a Federalist, lost reelection to Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Congress also changed hands, with the Democratic-Republicans achieving majorities in both chambers. Adams could see the writing on the wall: his party had been relegated to the judicial branch.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Marbury never got his deserved commission, the Court’s ruling set a very important precedent for the American judicial system. Without the case, the Supreme Court would have been a lifeless authority with no real power. It also shed very deserved light on the importance of judicial review, in other words, gave the supreme court the power and authority that it needed to have the final say when the situation involves legality. Throughout its long history, when the Court needed to affirm its legitimacy, it has cited Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison. (McBride,…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    18-Term Limit

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The significant arguments for implementing an 18-year term limit for Supreme Court justices are the unequality of presidential appointments, the political implications of judges’ retirements, and the idea that lifetime judges can become out-of-touch with American society. Implementing the 18-year term limit would allow for the appointment of a new judge every two years; therefore, every president would be able to nominate two judges in a four-year term. This change would account for the inequality in presidential influence on the Supreme Court. For example, Richard Nixon served as president for a year and half longer than Jimmy Carter, but Nixon appointed four judges to Carter’s zero. An 18-year term also takes the decision of when a justice…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. This work of art represents a higher class in society; one element of the art work that expresses this is the clothes that these people are wearing. People’s clothing attire – back then and even still today – can almost always give you an accurate idea, or at least a good clue, of what a person’s social status is. The painting of the Tallmadge family is a good supporting detail towards this point – “the opulence of the Tallmadges’ clothing and surroundings in these paintings abundantly testifies to the wealth, and the social pretensions, of the Federalist elite” (215). *** 2. “The most impressive by-product of the War of 1812 was a heightened nationalism” (240).…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, who was formerly a member of Andrew Jackson’s Kitchen Cabinet and a loyal…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (“The Andrew Jackson Administrations” 7). The matter was taken to court in the case of Worcester v. Georgia, and Judge John Marshall ruled that Georgia must honor their prior treaty with the Cherokee. Even though Jackson had previously shown support for a strong federal government, he strongly supported Georgia in this issue. He encouraged them to ignore Marshall’s ruling, saying “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it.”…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is commonly thought to be “above politics,” since they are there to just interpret the law and not argue politic, inevitably though, politics still manages to seep in. In fact the appointment of justices is, in reality, extremely political due to all the factors needed to be appointed. In order to be a justice three main characteristics are needed: ideology, ethnicity, and political experience. Each one has a profound impact in the appointment process. Interests groups are extremely concerned with the whole process because it could help or hurt the interests groups and it constitutions for generations if a justice is appointed that has contradictory views.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Judicial Activism

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When deciding on a case, justices of the Supreme Court are said to use either judicial activism or judicial restraint. Judicial activism has been described as the court’s willingness to make significant changes in public policy. These changes are made by reversing previously set precedents, reversing previous acts of Congress and lawmakers, or by reinterpreting the Constitution. Judicial activism is said to be a key part of justice’s attempts to match the…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays