The Second Amendment: The Right To Bear Arms

Great Essays
The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms. Some will claim the amendment protects the general public. Among industrial nations, the United States is the leader in per-capita gun deaths. Gun control laws serve as several functions. “They may be designed to hinder certain people from gaining access to any firearms. The laws may limit possession of certain types of weapons to the police and the military. A person who wants to make a gun purchase or obtain a gun license may be subject to a waiting period. Gun-control laws vary from country to country.” In the United States, there’s a severe lack of agreement on gun control which has led to a variety of …show more content…
There is no longer a need to protect ourselves by using guns. We have strong police forces and other protections to shelter Americans in this century. The only other reasons one would want to obtain a gun is for protection because of the fear of another having a gun or to cause harm on purpose to others. It’s a cycle and if we halted it, the craving of wanting a gun in the home would surely decrease. Allowing guns to be open to the general public isn’t reassuring, it makes some nervous. Guns should solitarily be available to military personnel or police officers and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Second Amendment gives the citizens of the United States the right to bear arm. Considering the enormity of this right, a heated debate has ensued on whether this right should be restricted. However, in the interest of public safety this right afforded by the bill of rights should be tightly regulated. This viewpoint has been developed through trial and error, after several mass shootings and high murder rates with a fire arms the United States is rendered no option but to restrict the Second Amendment to preserve the safety of the public.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1994 the republican controlled congress put a hold on any further actions towards gun control at the federal level. At the state level there are a number of different views when it comes to gun control. For example, Arizona has some of the most lenient guns laws of all the states. Arizona does not require a background check to transfer a firearm, does…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 2nd Amendment is the Right to Bear Arms. The 2nd Amendment states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of the Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is a strong topic, because many people stand behind it and many people want it repealed. I located an article written by Bret Stephens of the New York Time’s Magazine on October 5, 2017 talking about repealing the 2nd Amendment.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After every shooting, one can find the government making an impulsive attempt to calm down the public by stating “something needs to change” and yet a few weeks the later the issue is dropped, essentially going in one ear and out the other. Studies have shown that gun sales actually increase after a deadly shooting in America. For whatever reason, there seems to be a stronger desire to own a gun after a shooting in the news, in fear that the Democrats, liberals, and anti-gun lobbyists will finally muster up the support to get the Supreme Court to take them away. Unfortunately, it will take many more mass shootings to convince the whole country that military grade guns are not needed and only contribute to violence in our…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Recently there has been a lot of worldwide debating regarding the Texas Lawmakers passing a bill allowing guns on college campuses. There are many different opinions circulating this topic from gun advocates to professors and college students. Is it safer for a college community to have a carry conceal policy on campus than to have no policy at all? This question has come as a huge challenge in today’s society as the number of school shootings rise. The latest school shooting happened at Texas Tech on October 2017, involving 19 year old, Hollis Daniels.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Second Amendment to the Constitution for a reason; to protect the rights of the people. This means that citizens have the privilege and ability to possess a gun and use than gun for lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The government has no right to restrict them in owning guns for this reason. Further amending the right to own a gun would only do more harm than good in the United States. By creating stricter gun control laws, the government would not solve the problem of criminals obtaining weapons and would only take away the protection of the people.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Laws Pros And Cons

    • 1302 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purchase of guns should be heavily regulated by federal laws, making it more difficult for citizens to purchase and obtain guns. There should be stricter gun control laws in the United States to provide a balance between your right to bear arms and concern for public policy. There have been too many gun shots around the United States that question if the residence of U.S. should no longer have the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be in fringed.”…

    • 1302 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The right to bear arms in the United States is and has been one of the most debated topics involving the constitution. In the past century, countries from all around the world have been banning or heavily restricting access to firearms. England has restricted access to semi-automatic rifles that are abundant in the United States and Australia it is almost impossible to get one’s hands on a pistol. So if countries like Australia and England have laws making it hard to get guns, than why hasn’t the United States? The answer is because of the 2nd Amendment in the United States Constitution, which states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully, especially in places -- on streets, in taverns -- where the mere presence of a gun can increase the hazards we all face” (Wilson, 126). James Q. Wilson’s idea is excellent. Government should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully and increase efforts to combat crime, rather than simply execute gun control. Hopefully the government of the United States will make a right…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the United States of America was first established, the founding fathers believed that it was essential to have a Bill of Rights protecting its citizens. One of its rights is the right to bear arms, the Second Amendment. Through this day, that right is still being protected, but for what reason? The Amendment was created with the American Revolution in mind, in order to ensure that the citizens can protect themselves. However, it has been 224 years since then.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control in America has become a topic of debate lately by questioning our use of the second amendment and how we use it. Firearms can be used to cause mass homicide in schools (ProCon.org), or guns can also prevent burglary and theft in a gun owner’s home (Safewise.com). In short, guns are predominantly more beneficial to have than not to have (even with the chance of the owner misusing the firearm) because of the assurance and security it brings to the average gun owner. First off, gun control has distinct negative outcomes that sway the minds of people to not support more gun control. In a poll of roughly 21 million people, 54% said no to increased gun control in the poll above; this shows that more than 8% of people do not want any more gun control (isidewith.com) .…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, owning a gun can actually be more safe than not having one. It can bring a sense of security to your home knowing that you have some sort of protection. Someone who is properly trained can safely protect their house and family from anyone trying to harm them while not having to worry about any accidents happening. Everyone hears of those accidental shootings once in awhile, but how much blame can we put on guns? Car accidents happen every day but no one blames cars, so we shouldn’t blame guns.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays