The Fall Of Rome: An Analysis

Superior Essays
What would be the end of Rome? This article covers an analysis of two separate papers written by Antonio Santosuosso and Peter Heather. In particular, both authors discuss the fall of Rome and its causation. The intention is to shine light on comparative view between internal and external forces as the cause of Romes demise. Some could say there are specific events that led to the collapse, although its imperative that one might consider the entirety of factors playing a part in this drawn out play.
The first article after page 62 in our workbook describes the involvement of multiple internal factors that led to the fall of Rome. In the article, “Storming the Heavans: Soldiers, Emperors, and Civilians in the Roman Empire” it highlights the
…show more content…
The external elements are defined primarily as population movement and attacks by barbarians, such as the Huns. Nevertheless, internal elements played a role, though informed by the article “Transformations within the Roman world must…be taken into account when we look at the ability of outside groups to create increasing mayhem inside its borders,” (Heather, 109). The author acknowledges “the mayhem inside [Romes] borders,” (Heather, 109) though argues that over a prolonged period of time the involvement of barbarians led to internal consequences, subsequently Rome’s declined …show more content…
In this case, how could the fall of Rome begin, for a lack of better words, with out some sort of nudge? He states, “As in the past, the key was the army,” (Santosuosso, 103), yet Antonio gives no clarity or information toward the development of the ‘barbarians knocking on the gate’. Provided that, one could digress, the empire of Rome was ill. With the barbarians attacking on the front Rome was left to splinter from the inside. The consistent attacks from the barbarians tore apart Rome’s structure.
All things considered, the grounds for the fall of Rome can be debated. Who is to say that Rome fell as a result of being sick internally, or the barbarian movements towards the west began the decline. It is interesting though, as Rome holds a sizable impact on the formation of western society. Further more, the fall of the empire was not hurried, after the second century its problems began to worsen. A great empire proping up its advances in architecture, religion , art, ect. Falling to ruins. Would it be safe to say that most all great things come to an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome DBQ

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The principle reasons for the "Fall" of Rome were ,first, political instability, with an inability to have long terms as emperors[A], or control the dwindling Roman army[B], and the corruption within the high ranks of the government[E]. Also there were several invasions from the Huns [D] and others [C],with citizens who were happy to the better way of life of their captors[E]. Finally, there were many natural or environmental factors beyond the empire's control that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire, such as closeness to other warring people groups[C], consecutive natural disasters[F], and disease[F]. Political instability was a large factor in the decline of the Roman Empire. A chart compiled from various sources outlined the reign and cause of death of each emperor from 235-285 CE.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Document 2 Gibbon states that, “The decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable effect of immoderate greatness…” showing that Rome had become too big to sustain itself, including the government, military, and bureaucracy. This is also shown in Document 4, that the empire became so big that it was struggling to pay its expenses and that the heavy taxes were necessary. As the Roman Empire expanded so did the need for money and stable economics. But since the government was so big I ran itself and gave the people everything it wanted. They were all on welfare and in document 4, it sates “People learned to expect something for nothing.”…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the political dominance of Rome, the fall of it was inevitable. When leaders couldn’t control the people of this powerful empire, foreigners then saw this power of the world as an easy target. Also, when the economic system completely collapsed, Rome was an even easier target. Finally, when foreign invaders weakened the military to beat in the Mediterranean world, getting into the empire and sacking the heart of the empire itself wasn’t too hard of a task. All empires lose their strength and dominance for a reason and Rome’s reasons were problems with the government, economy, and military.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome Empire Dbq

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mobeen Dost Due Date: Thursday 12-15 500-600 words - 12/14 font Times Roman-types-loaded into managebac Final Essay: What caused the fall of the rome empire. 1. In my essay I will be talking about how Rome fell. My first topic is about how the barbarians caused Rome to fall.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document 5, Montanelli states that “Rome, like all great empires, was not overthrown by external enemies but undermined by internal decay”. This meaning, that the fall of Rome was dependant on the military crisis. Numbers made it hard for Rome’s military strength to prosper. The lack of children, and great numbers of foreigners caused for a lack of soldiers. Montanelli also says that “The Roman army [was] composed entirely of Germans.”…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critics argue that political instability lead to fall of Rome. Critics argue that political instability lead to the fall of Rome. However, the military mistakes lead people to think that military mistakes were the primary reason behind the decline of the Roman Empire. Two reasons to support the claim that military mistakes lead to the fall of the Roman empire are that the couldn’t conscription and that they didn't have the right armour.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome wasn’t always so broken, it used to be a beautiful place. But soon Rome fell, people call this the “Fall” of Rome. Rome didn’t fall for just one reason, but it did fall for many reasons. To start off, we have foreign invasions. Many times Rome was attacked by foreign invaders.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Analysis

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The “Fall” of Rome is a huge mystery so anything could have happened to make one of the most powerful empires drop into ruins. But there are still many huge pieces of evidence to back us up for the critical events that made them feel defeat. First of all, the reasons why Rome was weakening was the economical problems. According to Document E it states, “...taxes were severe” In other words, this shows that the emperors taxed heavily to pay for their own personal uses like throwing festivals and paying huge amounts of money just for food or just paying for people they owe debt to.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fall of the Roman Empire In approximately 200 AD, the ruling power of Greece started to diminish whereas the Roman Empire continued to expand at an exponential rate. The Roman Army persisted in their efforts to seize territory, and was so thorough in its imperialistic endeavors that it grew to an impressive size. Rome, obtaining the title of preeminent empire of the ancient world for several centuries, was comprised of various elements from successful societies such as the Greeks and Etruscans. These foreign lands impacted the republican government organization and further political ideology as well as the basic social and religious morals of the Roman people. Compared to all healthy governments, Western Rome faced trials regarding its…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “The Fall of Rome — an author discussion,” authors Bryan Ward-Perkins and Peter Heather present and confer their stances related to the fall of Rome. Though the two historians disagreed on a few concepts, they both definitely agreed that the fall of Rome was caused by a violent struggle through several “series of unfortunate events.” Contrary to other historians, like Walter Goffart, Ward-Perkins and Heather agreed that each time the Romans ceded land to foreign adversaries, their internal state of affairs were disrupted. For 70 years, Heather states, the Romans “struggled to survive” amid their “loss of vital, agricultural, tax base,” and their difficulty to maintain their military manpower. For example, Alexander Severus, who was Emperor from 222-235, was murdered by his own troops when he refused to increase their pay.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire has been widely analyzed and researched. For generations, historians have sought out the great flaw that led to the collapse of this once monumental civilization. One primary contributor to this effort was Edward Gibbon whose six volume discourse The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire was pivotal in societies attempt to understand this great tragedy. Gibbon’s arguments on the flawed power system in the empire caused by unprecedented virtues, as well as their mistaken identity in the dispute between scepticism and superstition/enthusiasm is an exceptional classification of Roman corruption. Historian and Professor J.G.A Pocock created an article to erupt Gibbons…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this part the author focuses on the neighboring cities to Rome. He refers to these as a “more traditional and convenient target (p.191)”. Using other articles and books as his sources, he proves his point that the outsiders to the Roman Empire were potentially the most dangerous enemy it ever had. Also by continuing chronologically through time he demonstrates examples of outsiders being a violent disturbance to the Roman Order.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many great leaders with very different styles of commanding. Some of these methods, while unorthodox, benefited the land’s people, the land’s economy, and people’s spirituality. In Rome, there were two powerful leaders who approached the throne differently: Gaius Octavius, “Augustus” and Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus, “Constantine”. Both of these men inspired changes for the Roman Empire, such as: political reforms, spiritual reforms, and social reforms. This paper will discuss which of the two men should have been deemed the true “Augusti”.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late Roman Republic, the external expansion of early Rome was a surprise to many. The era of the great expansion of Roman power and civilization is the era of the Roman Republic, in which its Senate ruled Rome and its assembly, which were establishments, formed at the beginning of the monarchy. The Republic had a history of many conflicts, aiding the Republic in becoming so powerful, thus making Rome become unstoppable. But as we all know from the conflicts that aroused in the past with many other large city-states and Empire’s, with incredible power comes many dilemmas.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the ‘Western Roman Empire’ was caused by a number of internal and external factors spread over more than a century. Their are many theories providing an explanation for the the fall of the empire and pinpointing the beginning of its decay, however one of the most accepted theories begins in the reign of Emperor Constantine (306-337 A.D) and his part in the split of the Roman Empire into two ‘West’ and ‘East’ regions and ends with the abdication of Romulus Augustus in 475 A.D. Responsibility is also given to the many waves of barbarians migrating into and pillaging the outer regions of the Western Empire, as well as widespread corruption, economic and social issues within the empire. The theory of government corruption having a…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays