Compare And Contrast Absolutism

Improved Essays
throughout history absolute monarch use it power to more easily control their territory. although absolutism strengthen a nation absolutism weaken a nation more than strengthen because absolute power corrupted absolutely and wars wage by the monarch puts a heavy burden on the peasant. such example can be seen during the reign of Louis XIV in France ( 1643 - 1715 ) and peter the Great in Russia ( 1682 - 1725 )

when louis xiv taken the throne in 1643 he began to established a solid foothold and prevent anyone being a threat to his throne, he excluded the noble from his council to reduce their power and influence. In return he gave them status which they enjoy and exempted from taxes. all noble of France were invited to lived in
Versailles which
…show more content…
Both absolute ruler have wanted to expand. Therefore raise army which is made up of peasant. they desire to expand have put heavy burden on the peasant because in France the upper class were exempted from taxes which cause the peasant to taken all the responsibility of taxation. Mean while in Russia all were tax harshly which made the people in Russian develop hatred toward his policy. Both nation under the absolute ruler have been in war for many year and it have only brought modest territory expansion. Another similarity between both absolutism is the building of their capital and palace, like many ruler in the past Louis XIV and Peter the Great ave possess a architecture that display their power and wealth. Louis XIV of France had the capital Versailles and Peter the Great build the beautiful city St.Petersburg. The different policy between the two absolutism is the changes they try to applied to their nation, France try to use mercantilism to increase the nation export and Russia try to westernized their nation to be like those in Europe. France biggest problem during the rule of Louis XIV is financial problem due to all the war the monarch wage. Louis assign Jean-Baptiste Colbert for the job and he shown he was the right man because under his leadership as secretary of financial France was able to be self sufficient and have better communication after the build of …show more content…
Absolutism cause social unrest because of constant taxation for wars, building, and other spending of he monarch, their desire cause hatred and starvation especially to the poor therefore absolutism weaken a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many rulers had a democracy government but it was difficult usually since the people found ways to overthrow the rulers. With absolutism many decisions involving the government were made quickly. King James I and King Louis XIV are just two examples of absolute monarchs that were able rule an entire empire effectively. Empires with absolute monarchs were very efficient. Various things were able to get done much faster.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many monarchs during the seventeenth century used absolutism as a governing force to rule their lands. During the reign of Louis XIV, Jean Domat wrote a profound document in which he addressed all areas of government and outlined what he believed to be the tenets of an absolute monarchy. This document, entitled “On Social Order and Absolute Monarchy” defined what he believed to be the basis of absolutism and class structure in regards to the law of God and the law of nature. Absolutism is as form of government where unrestricted, complete power is retained by a centralized sovereign individual. Domat displays immense support of the concept of absolutism and outlines the idea that the people should show loyalty to their one appointed leader who is chosen by God.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An absolute monarchy could only be successful under the leadership of an extraordinary ruler who had complete power over his people. An absolute monarch should be able to overachieve the abundance of obstacles placed in front of him. King Louis XIV was able to obtain much of his prodigious power by creating a new, modernized army. Louis was an exceptional mastermind at trade and he had dramatically increased France’s revenue. These actions allowed him to have the unique ability to create such a powerful army.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Louis XIV Successful? The Great Louis XIV reigned as a successful king in France from 1643 through 1715. Louis was considered the embodiment of an “absolute” monarch, because of his need for sole power and ruling. As Louis started his reign, many things needed to be changed, from being a disconnected age, to a integrate procedure. He commenced this process by taking full power over France and converting to only one religion.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Absolutism Thesis

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Sanjana Sinha Period: 3 10/25/15 Thesis Statement: All rulers in the world in Europe in the 1700s were state builders because they improved education, they made the government better, and they improved agriculture. Annotated Bibliography “Age of Absolutism.” Packet.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both wars were initiated by injustices of monarchies and inspired by Enlightenment ideas, and the French Revolution was largely inspired by the American Revolution. The French and American revolutions are often remembered by the exercise of thought of the Enlightenment. Such illuminist values guaranteed the right of men to life, liberty, the conquest of happiness, private property, self-government, free expression, and all men were equal. It also affirmed that the state should guarantee these rights to its citizens. The Enlightenment also brought important concepts like universal suffrage and the division of powers and also brought concepts about commercial freedom and ended any trace of feudalism.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    France in the mid 17th century was quite hectic. At the time, King Louis XIII was in power and basically running the country into the ground. To start, he was ruling with the help of his closest advisors and Cardinal Richelieu which, in effect, gave some of his power away. Along with that, Louis XIII was in continuous violent religious discords with the Huguenots (Biography.com Editors. " Louis XIII Biography").…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism was a political theory created by the following individuals; Jean Bodin, Thomas Hobbes (somewhat), and Bishop Bossuet. The era of absolutism was a time, 16th to 18th centuries, when monarchs ruled with all power to themselves in most countries, especially in France. Absolutism was favored among monarchs because it gave them complete power over their country and did not have to answer to anyone but themselves. Western absolutist France and eastern countries were similar by focusing on military aspects such as spending money to build large and powerful armies to win wars and gain land, and using increased taxation on lower classes to gain money, as well as monarchs ruling as the sovereign of that state. Eastern and western absolutism…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism was a big part of Europe for a long period of time and so was enlightenment but that does not mean that they got along. Some philosophers like Hobbes were for absolutism and thought that is the best government for the people, but others thought the opposite and were against it. Locke, Voltaire, and Wollstonecraft were some of the philosophers that rejected the concept of absolutism and went against the absolute monarchs and their policies. Thomas Hobbes believed in absolutism, he thought that people are naturally cruel, greedy and selfish, but John Locke was against absolutism, he believe in equality, freedom and natural rights for all men (Esler 545). Both men were 17th century english thinkers that gave ideas that became key to enlightenment but they had very different ideas on human nature and the government (Esler 545) this shows that it is not obvious…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Louis was able to make the exporting a lot cheaper and bring in much revenue through his importing. This made Louis very powerful and soon enough his became the absolute ruler of France. In addition, Louis centrialed France’s government, this was mainly done by the Palace of Versailles which was the central part housed by the French government. Although, this Palace was highly expensive it made Louis a stronger and definitely a more powerful ruler. This house gave Louis the power to make the nobles his servants.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism is a political solution where the monarchy controls every facets of government with no checks or balances, it was initially introduced by the English by Kings, James and Charles I. Although it was introduced in the England (maybe Spain) it never did take hold mainly because of an established parliament that was so strongly ingrained into the English process of government. On the other hand, Louis XIV was able to secure an absolute monarchy and take it to extremes. He was able under the precept of “Divine Right” and claiming to be servant of God. This would allow Louis XIV to dissolve the Estates-General (a general assembly). Louis XIV is the poster child of what an absolute monarch is supposed to be and had no issue in letting the people of France know his status.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starvation portrayed a pivotal role in the rage of the 18th century French peasants in the novel, A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens. A lack of leadership and a poor economy can spark a distrust for any countries leaders, but when entire families are being eradicated by a serious aliment hatred will be felt. Starvation is a serious issue that can lead to various physical and psycho-social issues that can amplify feelings of rage. By the summer of 1789 France was in a grave financial crisis. The French monarch, Louis XVI, had taken the throne after his grandfather in 1774.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This much power was a lot for one man to possess. With this sole form of government there is no check or balance on the king’s power; he answers to himself alone. It is for these reasons that a monarchy is not always the best form…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism Vs Monarchy

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism is known for being under a single leader. Many have stated that “monarchical government is the best.” In The Theory of Divine Right absolute monarch was the “most natural” which lead to it being the “most durable” and “strongest.” With the government under a single ruler it could also lead to it being the “most opposed to divisiveness”, “worst evil of states”, and the “most certain cause of their ruin.” In many societies absolutism “works in harmony” with everything.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays