Genetic Modification In Oryx And Crake

Superior Essays
Human evolution took millions of years to develop our current species and to develop the technological sophistication we now have today. The possibilities of human advancement seem limitless and the only opposition we have is ourselves. Why should humanity limit itself over genetically modified organisms? Why do people think humans have gone to far on genetic engineering? Genetic modification is the process of altering the DNA in an organism’s genome. The novel Oryx and Crake is a book about the things that worry the author, and warns us what may come if society continues on this current path of using genetic modification. Much of the general public believes that genetic modification should actually be a concern because of dangerous health …show more content…
Genetic modification is a problem that we face in our society to this day not only through the modification of plants, food and animals but also genetic modification of humans. Throughout the novel of Margret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake she portrays genetic modification as a warning to her readers that genetic modification is not something to continue with as it might turn her novel into becoming less science fiction and more speculative fiction. When she talks about the OranInc farm in Oryx and crake and the genetically modified pigoons it makes a connection to today’s world of genetically modifying animals to increase their suitability for use in extensive mono-culture. As Atwood (2003) astutely observes, “the pigoon organs could be customized, using cells from individual human donors, and the organs were frozen until needed” (p.23). Atwood is talking about pigs that have been …show more content…
Though an accepted idea, it is still greatly controversial. This practice has allowed humans to provide greater nutrition to third world countries at low costs, and increase the quantity and quality of food overall. However, despite its current and potential function, genetically modified food has been heavily criticized because of its health and safety. One of the primary uses of GMOs in Oryx and Crake features the ChickieNobs, which were just starting production at the time when Jimmy visits Crake at Watson-Crick. The ChickieNobs are described as a “large bulblike object that seemed to be covered in stippled whitish-yellow skin. Out of it came twenty thick fleshy tubes, and at the end of each tube another bulb was growing” (Atwood 202). What Atwood is trying to portray is that genetically modified food in today society is really not far off from what is being said in the novel. In today’s world there are animals that are genetically modified to increase quantity over being naturally produced. Jimmy was horrified at the sight of the creature, but in terms of high producing food in a world with dwindling resources, the ChickieNob sounds ideal. When compared with traditional chicken farming (which is cruel, dangerous and bad for the environment), something like the ChickieNob would be the perfect solution. However, there is something about the unfamiliar and new that causes humans to feel

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If it's acceptable to modify one gene, why not two, or 20 or 200? At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone's specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? Given what we know about human nature, the development and commercial marketing of human genetic modification would likely spark a techno-eugenic rat-race. Even parents opposed to manipulating their children's genes would feel compelled to participate in this race, lest their offspring be left behind.”…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cook-Deegan and Maienschein abstain from arguing for or against genetic engineering rather the argument lies in the fact that the public should decide actively instead of passively. Cook-Deegan and Maeinschein’s introduction does a good job of putting into context how far genetic engineering has progressed, but the shift from the recent advancements of genetic engineering to history of the genetic engineering is abrupt. The beginning of the paper leads a different way than where the paper's purpose is. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein main function of this paper is to make apparent to the public that they are currently deciding passively which is never a good way to decide. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein are discussing much more than just genetic engineering.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic modification in both animals and plants for the purpose of faster and voluptuous growth rate is rapidly increasing. The three articles that were located, all revolve around the aspect of genetic modification in the food we consume. Genetically modified food are food derived from organisms that have undergone changes in their DNA through the processes of genetic engineering. It takes many steps to modify the genetics of an organism and they include isolating a particular gene and duplicating it several times. Additionally, there are a vast amount of benefits and concerns of genetic modification in food.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SUMMARY/PRECIS Professor Ronald Green of Dartmouth University, in his article, Building Baby from Genes Up, addresses the topic of whether or not genetic engineering is a viable technological advancement for our society to pursue and argues that although there are many potential drawbacks, the overall benefits of genetic engineering outweigh its downfalls. He supports this claim by addressing the variety of benefits that genetic engineering can offer, then by categorically refuting counterarguments and finally by presenting his opinion for why each downfall of genetic engineering is surmountable. Green’s purpose is to shed light on both sides of the argument when it comes to genetic engineering, while posing the idea that genetic engineering…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deciding Actively Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area ever since it was first brought to in lab, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally pop up in the news and the argument will be reignited but quickly fizzle out till the next breakthrough appears on media. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent breakthroughs in genetic engineering which brings into perspective the relevance,…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Engineering is the modification of an organism 's genetic composition by artificial means, often involving the transfer of specific traits, or genes, from one organism into a plant or animal of an entirely different species. With this new, rapidly growing, technology we are now able to do things that we once thought were impossible. In Ethics and the New Genetics, the Dalai Lama addresses problems that we need to consider as we continue to explore this microscopic world that we have uncovered. The Dalai Lama believes that we need to have an appreciation for the value of human beings, the world as a whole, and that the motivation behind our genetic explorations must be pure and compassionate. Genetic modification gives us access to an immense amount of power through the…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The introduction of a new idea is often met with risks and turmoil. These are unintended and unforeseen consequences that come inherent with the disruption of the status quo by an eager challenger. Whether or not this idea actually holds merit is irrelevant; what is important is that society possesses the necessary information to fully understand its potential impact, both now and into the future. Currently, this new attractive idea is genetic manipulation. On the surface, genetic engineering, or GE, offers tremendous opportunity for personal betterment – whether it is tweaking IQ, forging muscle, or building stamina, never has true biological perfection been so attainable as it is today.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that the four main concerns about gene manipulation are the effect of gene modification on the parents, our freedom, our social divisions, and people’s religions. The first concern is if parents will replace the love for their child “with a consumerist mentality that seeks perfection” (Green 2). Parents who wish for healthy children and have one born with disabilities love their child unconditionally regardless of having perfect genes. Gene modification would not change this fact because “that child is already remarkably influenced by the genes they inherit” (Green 3). The second concern is if our freedom will be diminished “by making us creatures of our genes or of our parents’ whims” (Green 2).…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The further shows why science is not wrong but what plagues society is more about laws, patent and morality. To demonstrate that his views are ethical, he argues that while people opposed to genetic modification of foods argue that it is because it involves the use of chemicals, genetic modification is actually shifting genes around to improve foods. He further argues that, “ Genetically engineered food. We don't want to encourage people to eat that rotten stuff, like cassava for instance”. Human beings have actually used genetically engineering to come up with new foods that have significantly improved the quality of life for millions of people across the world.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are Gmos Safe?

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lots of people die each year because to starvation and disease. Some scientists think that they have found a helpful tool to use for these problems, GMOs. The only problem is other scientist think that GMOs are not safe. In the 1990s GMOs, which stands for Genetically Modified Organisms, was discovered. Our genes make us who we are because they control our looks and the things that we do.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gmos Research Paper

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nullifying GMOs, not a big deal As we head deeper into the 21st century, new scientific discoveries are being build as the foundation for humanity. Genetic modification is one of the foundations that might crumple and collapse because of the dangers of genetically modified products. Genetically modified products are one of the minor issues that countries discuss and take action. In the United States, genetically modified food products are favored by the majority of the public, but some people have argued that the process of genetically modifying products is dangerous and can cause harm in humans if any mistakes in modifying is made. If all the reasons against GMOs are true, then taking all genetically modified products…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should We Allow Genetic Engineering of Humans? Genetic engineering is a burgeoning technology that has been surging in development and popularity within the last few years. Genetic engineering is the altercation of genes in an organism. Humans have been doing this for millennia through process of selective breeding since the dawn of agriculture. In modern times, we have made a lot of headway on the development of technologies that make the process easier.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enhancing Society at a Cost In recent years, scientists developed genetic engineering in animals. Gene modification enhances animals by increasing fertility, and allows the possibility of cloning. However, cloning and designing animals leads to the application of genetic modification in humans. In Dinesh D’Souza’s essay, “Staying Human,” he reveals the positive and negative effects of genetic engineering, but he affirms the unethical application of genetic engineering.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Genetic engineering isn’t perfect no matter how much knowledge there is about it, but it still has huge benefits to life on earth. In today’s society we don't have enough knowledge or research done on it, so we can’t move much further with it yet. In Brave New World, there is plenty of knowledge on it, but the knowledge is just used in the wrong way. The public nowadays isn’t at all ready for technology of such a high controversy, without even mentioning that “these technologies pose special challenges. They are very new”(Hayes, Richard).…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The persuasive piece that I have chosen to use for my rhetorical analysis is a transcript from a TED talk by Paul Root Wolpe titled, “It’s time to Question Bio-engineering”. Wolpe is an ethicist who studies the implications of the new sciences, is the head at the Center for Genetics at Emory University, and is the chief bioethicist for NASA. He begins his talk by presenting the audience with examples of selective breeding in animals and mentions many hybrid animals such as “beefalo”, “cama” and “geep”. When Wolpe brings up the discussion about these hybridized animals, he conveys to the audience what could possibly happen if bio-engineering continues to evolve and especially if it is used in humans.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays