Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… Those supporting capital punishment believe that killing someone is the right thing to do, considering the fact that the act of killing someone is how the person receiving the punishment got into the situation. Going through with capital punishment is just as bad as the assault and murder committed by the criminal. The saying goes “Two wrongs don’t make a right”; which is accurate a hundred percent. Yes, the person who has harmed and killed other people has now become immune to the pain brought upon his or her victims, but is it right?If the government is killing people out of revenge, then it is inferred that the citizens under the security of the government will do the same as well. In the end capital punishment doesn’t alleviate anything;it simply exacerbates the problem creating more than enough violence. The victims families might feel a sense of completion, but at the end of the day the death of a criminal doesn’t change anything. Although the victims families …show more content…
Taking advantage of people for self-gain is completely inappropriate, point blank period regardless of the circumstances. Think of a situation where a student is getting rewarded and recognized for an assignment, that was simply copied from another student. One might simply say that cheating and copying off of someones work is no big deal. No one ever thinks about how much time, work, and effort the other person actually completing the assignment put into it. This situation can be compared to something even bigger,it can be compared to identity theft . People who take place in these acts believe that the financial gain they acquire justifies how they received it. The person who is the victim of the situation has put their time and hard earned money into building up their position in life. Just because the person taking the victim’s identity isn’t in the same position and is struggling to make ends meet doesn’t make it acceptable.Everyone should have to work for the things they want to attain in life because nothing is easily handed to you. Committing such an immoral action is inconsiderate towards the victim and disregards the possible arising conflicts. All because someone without the decency to work for their things took a person’s identity ,there is a possibility that a victim could become financially unstable , homeless, and emotionally

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The illusion of death row inmates fitting a cookie cutter description is not true. Inmates on death row come from various socio-economic backgrounds and careers. Not all death row inmates are guilty. In 2004, the state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for allegedly setting his home on fire, killing his three daughters. However, it was the work of the Innocence Project (Garland, September, 13, 2010) proving the forensic and informant attested in court was invalid and just not true; hence, an innocent man was executed.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Stoning

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Women have been victims of injustice for hundreds of years, but in Pakistan there is a particular form of torture that stands out amongst them all. Stoning is a form of capital punishment known to Pakistan, where a group of people throw stones at a man or women until he or she dies. Unfortunately, women are more often subjected to this form of punishment than men because of their status in society. Stoning is considered a form of execution by torture because it is a lot slower than other forms of execution. In other countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, stoning has been declared illegal, but it is still being practice extra judicially which means it is beyond the action or authority of the court.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    nobody deserves to die for committing crime by mistake or without conscious, so the main point for human rights examinations must be that the death penalty is disproportionate with fundamental human rights standards. "Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."(Martin Luther King). Capital punishment may have impact in expanding violence mentalities in a society which might increase the quantity of crimes rate in countries that practiced it.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is not to argue about the pros and cons of the death penalty and juveniles, but to give data it can inform the controversial argument to focus on the Death Penalty and Juveniles. This is important to the general area under study because it will give a clearer view on the opinions of each person on the death penalty and juveniles. The intent is to provide details of death penalty and juveniles, whereas to give an understanding of what causes these young offenders to commit a crime and why the law agrees with the death penalty on juveniles with no difference from the adults. Additional studies show the death penalty used with juveniles may perhaps appear to be civilized or not. Sentencing a juvenile to death could lead to asking questions for…

    • 2957 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indulgences Controversy

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another example of this would be the monk John Tetzel’s abuse of selling indulgences for money. He scammed members of the Church out of their money by using catchy slogans, and playing into the emotional attachment these people had to their deceased relatives. The corruption was so bad that monk Martin Luther wrote ninety-five theses on the practice of indulgences and how it needed…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a government sanctioned law by which person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The crimes that result in death are known by capital offences. For example: rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, murder. Capital punishment was common in the past, now a days the large majority discontinued the process.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital punishment was supposed to be a punishment in which the justice system puts to death the most malevolent criminals. Capital punishment was supposed to work as deterrence for crimes. It was supposed to scare criminals so that they do not kill or committee heinous crimes, if they do so the punishment will be death by the state. Not only has capital punishment not worked as deterrence for criminals, capital punishment shows to have a racial bias in convicting criminals. Too much tax dollars are given to execute a man when we can just build a prison and t Let them sit there a rot I a cell.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lethal injections have been a controversial topic for many centuries. People have many opinions as to if lethal injections are humane or if the act violates the Constitution. The use of lethal injections became a topic of interest around the 1980s. The first lethal injection execution was administered by Dr. Ralph Gray in 1982. The execution went successfully and from there the use of lethal injections became more popular, which started arguments as people expressed their opinions.…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment, A Capital NO Capital punishment has a long and gruesome history, regrettably that history is not all in the past. Capital punishment, the practice of putting someone to death as punishment for a crime, is still exercised within fifty-eight countries and thirty-one American states. Although today’s methods of government sanctioned executions are more humane and less violent than our days past; when to be put to death meant to be hanged, flayed, burned alive or worse, it should still be considered by all, as a grave injustice to humanity. If killing is so wrong that it is considered one of the worst crimes a person could commit, why should the government be able to do exactly that.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Killing is wrong. Since we were kids, we have been taught this is the absolute truth. In its simplest form, capital punishment is, one person taking the life of another. Simultaneously, this is the definition of murder. In USA, 31 states have capital punishment, they must change.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being a teen its hard and one dumb mistake or one laps of judgment could land them face to face with a un fair trial which could end up landing them in prison for life without parole. This is the cold reality that faced two small boys, Derek and Alex King,brothers who were reunited after living a part for most of their lives,they were twelve and thirteen years old when the killed their father. They were sentenced 8 years in prison with no education or knowledge of the outside world and when those years were up instead of rampaging and wreaking havoc they automatically continued their education and they became productive members of the society. This supports the that teens shouldn’t be charged with life in prison without parole. This is due…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment The first recorded execution was in 1608 (Fridell). This form of punishment has been around for many years and should continue to be used based on its effectiveness. It has its perks and it’s downfalls, but needs to be put in place to keep order in our society. If it wasn’t for the death penalty I believe our most violent individuals would stop at nothing to commit these outrageous crimes.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to article Capital punishment states, “some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties—up to and including life sentences or even death," (par,8). They believe that the death penalty is effective and preventive to violent crime because criminals will now think twice before committing a murder. " Recent investigations, using a variety of samples and statistical methods, consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder rates," (capital, par.10). They believe having the inmate sit in jail is too expensive because it cost taxpayers “$31,286” per inmate annually (capital, par…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A popular topic in our country today is the death penalty. Jean-Jacques Rousseau once said, “In any case, frequent punishments are a sign of weakness or slackness in the government. I think that there is no man so bad that he cannot be made good for something. No man should be put to death, even as an example, if he can be left to live without danger to society.” When considering the death penalty, some thoughts I had were: Is he mentally stable?…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everybody utilizes people as means to an end. However, manipulating people to obtain what we desire and consistently disrespecting their human worth is thoroughly against the moral law (Crowther,…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays