The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)

Superior Essays
The nation has the opportunity to increase the production of natural gas, an energy source that is environmentally friendly. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, “ANWR” for short, is a national wildlife refuge in northeastern Alaska. It consists of 19.6 million acres in the Alaska North Slope region. Nicholas Monaghan reports that the ANWR has been at the face of the environmental policy debate for over thirty years. Since the early 1970s, there has been an environmental battle between oil interests in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Those who seek to drill for oil and those who prohibit drilling. (649) The drilling is a confrontation between the United States economic needs versus the Arctic’s ecosystem’s needs. While most people say …show more content…
Those contradicting drilling, fear that if oil drilling occurs, it will cause “more roads, landing strips, and mechanisms for transporting oil back to the continental United States.” (Monaghan, 652) They also fear that the drilling will ruin the wilderness, as well as kill off the animal population in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Fortunately, many economic impacts can be eased with improved technology, such as slant-drilling, making it possible to “reach more reservoirs with fewer wells.” (Kotchen&Burger, 4725) In addition, Kotchen and Burger reported on the fact that some species of animals aren’t affected by human disruptions. There is an estimated amount 2,500 polar bears living in and around the ANWR. While oil development could impact their behavior, studies have shown that polar bear populations, located near drilling sites have grown over periods of “petroleum development” and are relatively unaffected by human disturbances. …show more content…
This extra money the United States would receive from lack of imported oil would allow for more improvements. Initially many people, including myself, find it absurd that anyone would want the US to start drilling. However, after reading the article written by economists, Kotchen and Burger, they made good points. There are enough tensions already with the United States and the Middle East. They don’t have our best interests in mind, so we need to think about ourselves and how we can better our country without help. With drilling in Alaska, it would allow us to break away from Middle Eastern countries, possibly reducing terrorism. Drilling would also help the economy. The United States depends on oil tremendously, using up 25% on the world’s oil. If we produced it here in the US, it would cut excess costs of transportation and it would help finically support struggling families. While many activists are worried about the life of the animals living in the refuge, for example polar bears show not to be affected by human disturbances. Along with new technology advancements, the risk of drilling causing spills wouldn’t be as much of a

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Pinedale Pros And Cons

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The regularly acknowledged issues of oilfield drilling are clearly faced in Pinedale, and these issues have been handled nicely in both the Jonah field and the Pinedale anticline. In a personal interview with Pinedale’s local high school energy explorations teacher, Debra Noble, the effects of the oilfield on both the citizens of the town, as well as its environmental impacts are discussed. The teacher points out that throughout Sublette County, most of the wells are located on public land which is thought to make the “operators take better care of the land. They have to follow all of the BLM's guidelines and make sure that they monitor wildlife, air quality, water quality, and recreational opportunities.” While, in areas of the country where all the wells are on private land, the companies are able to cut corners and not be as environmentally conscious.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefor after much consideration and research I would have to side with pro drilling. Allowing drilling to begin will only further secure our independence from foreign oil that places our nation in economic and political danger. It will substantially increase economic activity in multiple industries, as well as create new much need employment. And improve upon technology alongside research and development. The only way offshore drilling can become most effective and productive is if the commutation and cooperation between scientist, oil companies, communities and the government is…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oil is a very important part in our live. But some people don't even acknowledge this. People want more and more oil. Canadians uses twice as much oil then ever. In 1980 people use nearly 1.8 million gallons but now they use nearly 3 million gallons.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a foreword to Subhankar Banerjee's book, former President Jimmy Carter makes an argument against allowing drilling and industrial activity in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In his defence of his position, Carter effectively uses a combination of factual evidence, style, and appeals to emotion to persuade the reader of his ideas. Carter starts the foreword off by describing a time when he went to the Arctic Refuge with his wife, and recounting all of the Refuge's natural beauty, from the "brilliant mosaic" of plant life to the "spectacle" of caribou migration. This use of imagery helps create the feeling that the Arctic Refuge is sacred and beautiful, and therefore deserving of protection; this is a form of emotional appeal; his description of this in the form of a narrative also makes him feel more genuine and relatable.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been long acknowledged that the Untied States is in need of finding a natural energy source in order to become a more sustainable country and to also become less dependent on the Middle East. Attaining natural gas and oil from shale is a game changer when it comes to energy production. However, this revolutionary approach has created environmental skepticism around how environmentally friendly and sustainable this practice actually is and the types of problems that could be associated with fracking as a practice. Hydraulic Fracking has become extremely controversial because of very serious potential environmental risks. Enormous amounts of water are used during the fracking process, which become polluted creating a high probability…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Carter sets forth a very compelling case for preserving the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This is quite an important issue as noted by this former President and gives interesting personal details to further his arguments. He uses his vast experience in dealing with complex issues such as the environment to make his point that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should remain untouched. Considering the evidence first mentioned in this passage, the President uses his personal experiences and his powerful usage of diction to show the reader how important the issue of protecting the environment truly is. Very descriptive details of the beauty of this land are found throughout his essay.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anyone who has spent a prolonged period of time in the wild and has enjoyed the experience of observing the world in it’s natural habitat can see the importance of preserving our wildlife. In Jimmy Carter’s attempt to save the wildlife refuge in Alaska he uses reasoning, evidence, the past, and personal experience in the wild. Carter argues that preserving this extraordinary pure land in it’s “pure, untrammeled state” would be a “Great triumph for America”. Jimmy Carter starts by exonerating the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and describing its natural beauty and magnificence. He does this to get the reader to relate and use their own experience in nature to start a sense of credibility towards what he is writing.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adapted from former US president Jimmy Carter, Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Season of Life and Land a Photographic Journey by Subhankar Banerjee. Jimmy Carter and Subhankar Banerjee wrote the book or essay about the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Jimmy Carter only wrote the foreword of the Essay though. Subhankar Banerjee wrote the rest of the Essay himself. This is about how the oil plant would destroy the Wildlife Refuge.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most widely debated topics, in recent years, is the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The completion of the project has been done in multiple phases and one of the last phases scheduled to be completed is the phase 4 extension. This extension would create a pipeline that would trek, around 2000 miles, from Alberta Canada to the gulf coast of Texas (Friends of the Earth). Since the pipeline would cross international borders, approval from congress would be necessary in order to begin construction (NPR). The two main issue points on the topic are the economic gains that could incur from the development of the pipeline and the overall impression on the environment that would ensue from extraction, transportation, and refining of the oil.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Natural gas drilling is becoming a major profit maker for a multitude of companies. In response to being offered one hundred thousand dollars to sell his land for hydraulic fracturing, Josh Fox, a native Pennsylvania documentary filmmaker, begins to do his own research into the drilling industry. With the help of people from across the county, Fox is able to obtain first hand repercussions of the natural gas drilling on water supplies, overall health, animals, life after fracking, and the lack of faith within communities state governments. Using the documentary, Gas Land, produced by Josh Fox, I will look into the overall message of the documentary, the methodologies and research methods used, the empirical data presented, along with the ethics…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States’ has been using oil to fuel the needs of people and businesses for an extensive period of time. The country’s reliance on oil is a huge factor in maintaining the stability of the country. Though many advocate as to why the Keystone XL Pipeline will leave a positive impact on the country through economic prosperity and secured borders, many are consumed by the thoughts of potential damages and…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jimmy Carter writes, “tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge,” to describe what industrialization will do to the Arctic National Wildlife refuge. The general argument in Carter’s forward is that this Arctic refuge should not be developed for industry. First, he uses facts and evidence to build his claim. Then he uses word choice and imagery to support his argument. His purpose is to persuade his audience that development will have negative consequences for the Arctic refuge, in order to protect this unique awe inspiring wildlife refuge.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On March 24, 1989, one of the worst recorded oil spills occurred in Prince William Sound, Alaska (Seitel, 2011, p.100). A 987-foot tanker from Exxon Mobil Corp., the Exxon Valdez, spilled 260,000 barrels of oil after the intoxicated ship captain “ran aground on a reef 25 miles southwest of the port of Valdez” (Seitel, 2011, p.101). The oil spill damaged over 1,300 square miles of coast line and caused the death of various sea life, including over 4,000 Alaskan sea otters (Seitel, 2012, p.101). Exxon Mobil’s public relations approach to the crisis received criticism and the mistake affected the company nearly twenty years later.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Essay: Saving Oceans Six years ago the Deepwater Horizon oil spill released “210 million gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico…killing 4,768 animals” (Jarvis). This Deepwater Horizon oil spill caused a lot of harm to our sea life and greatly damaged ecosystems. Oil floated to the surface and washed up on shorelines as it covered beaches for miles along the coastline. Organizations joined together to help begin the process of rescuing and rehabilitating animals that suffered from this tragedy.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics