The Categorical Imperative And Immanuel Kant's Philosophy

Decent Essays
Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, is a good form of beliefs. His ideas presents good morals that would lead to a better world. He believes that the highest good for human beings is attaining virtue and happiness at the same time. By living by his morals, there will be no more lies, deaths, and violence in the world. His beliefs are summarized in his Categorical Imperative.

Kant’s 1st Categorical Imperative, which is the idea of universality. The main idea is that one should only do something, only if one thinks it’s okay if everyone did it all the time. One must treat others how one wants to be treated. Kant’s 2nd Categorical Imperative, is the idea of ends versus means; Which means that everyone deserves to be treated with justice and fair treatment; One must never manipulate one another because everyone is their own person; however we can rely on one another but we must treat them with respect.
…show more content…
One must also never lie because it is morally wrong. He believes that what is right, is right and what is wrong, is wrong. One must also never kill innocent lives and one must also never cheat others. Kant believes that everyone must always tell the truth, no matter what circumstance. He also strongly believes that one must never use people and that people deserves to be treated as they deserve, even though one might rely on them. To Kant, right has priority over the good, what is good may not always be right, however one must always choose to do what is right; One must also do the right thing for the right reason because if not, doing right has no moral worth, if it is for the wrong reasons; One must do something not for one’s own benefits or personal gains but because it is the morally right thing to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant also talks about maxims and how you see yourself acting on this situation by lying but also knowing that you if you do then you are acting immorally. Reason vs. desire these are the two ways in which you make decision. Kant discusses that reason is the same for all rational creatures which is why you might think letting the murderer know that you have seen the person is crazy but actually isn’t. Kant also uses FEI as an argument to people who think you should lie to the murderer at the door as well. He does this by saying when lying to the murderer at the door you are using the other person merely as a means and by doing this you violate IC or informed consent.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant argues in the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals that we have “duties to ourselves” which leads some actions to be wrong; however, these actions do not concern to anyone but ourselves. Giving a loan to oneself and promising to pay it back is such a duty that some might believe in, but other than that most believe there are no duties at all. The action could not be wrong if the only one person directly involved in that action agrees to it. Some might beg to differ from this argument. Kant believes that we have duties to ourselves, and his notion of moral duty is explained so as to encompass the idea of “duty to oneself.”…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s basis for “Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals” is an objective view into how and why decisions are made among rational beings for the furtherance of their and society’s wellbeing. Through his view in the 1700’s we can see how much of a scientific stance Kant took in journalizing his analyzation of his own and society’s morals. Kant lists five “formulations” that are involved in rational decision-making. Rational beings have utilized the “Categorical Imperative” to shape today’s society by way of relationships and treatises. These formulations give rational beings an expanded view of the many faces of the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Kant, a good will is good not for the reason of its consequences, or the purpose of its action, and what it may achieve. If we are to take out of its con and pro, its value will still remain, and that indicated an action of good will is simply good, it’s an action of viture, and vuntilary. Kant talked about other goods that are desirable because their qualification, and the good consequences brings us pleasure and happiness. Although they may be good, but unlike good will they are not absolutely good. These goods, such as wealth, while it can bring happiness, but they can also become bad, depends on the motivation, wealth could bring greed, unlike good will, these are tools.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Questions pertaining to whether certain actions are morally right or morally wrong are never easy to settle. There are various moral theories that try to address the question, divine command theory, virtue ethics, ethical egoism, cultural relativism, to name just a few. There is, of course, not much agreement among moral philosophers as to which is correct. There is, however, much agreement on what is actually morally right or morally wrong. The merits of a particular moral theory will depend (in part) on whether or not it can account for actions most of us consider to be right.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s impact on Western thought is undoubtedly profound. Being one of the most distinguished figures of the German Idealist movement of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Kant’s work has set a precedent that, to this day, deeply influences our understanding of ethical discussion, political philosophy, and human cognition. Kant’s multiple contributions still are subject of debate; although, it is his Categorical Imperative that gathers the most attention, discourse, and controversy. Being a reaction to the subjectivity of his era, the Categorical Imperative provides an objective and infallible guideline for universal moral behavior, that stipulates one’s actions should not be dependent on ulterior motives and in consideration that the act itself will become universally accepted, ergo, if one were to steal then one should also be accepting of…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant clearly states people should do the right thing, and avoid doing wrong. Some of the universal morals he describes are do not kill, do not lie, do not steal. He states that people should do the right thing, even if it may lead to harm. This emphasises on the welfare of every human being. Kant also explained that every rational person can define good, without the help of the community or religion.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Firstly, Kant demonstrates his views on how others should be treated through his two moral Maxims. In his first moral maxim, Kant states “I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (CCCB, 16), demonstrating his belief that everyone in the world is equal and that no individuals are above others and therefore, should not have the right to act differently. In other words, all life principles must be applicable, equal and fair to all people if they are to be universal. Furthermore, Kant’s second moral maxim states, “Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end” (CCCB, 17). In fact, Kant believed that people should not be used and exploited for the benefit of another.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant an 18th century German philosopher considered rather notable for his work in ethical philosophy. Kant was responsible for the book Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morality and his work remains relevant today as a crucial ‘part of Western Moral Philosophy’. Kant argues that reason is what predisposes what is right. Kant believed that religion should not be taken into consideration when determining what is morally right. Kant’s reasoning of this is explained that if one only gaged what is right based on religion this would not result in a ‘supreme principle of morality’ for all people.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One’s moral compromise, integrity, honesty, or if you will be compromising your virtues are the issues that are at stake in the article. One of the points of the author was that if engaging in that behavior does not put anyone in danger it is acceptable; however, it can be argued on the morals of the individual. For example – cheating, just because 99% of the class is cheating in an exam does that mean its ok for you to cheat as well? that is something morally questionable in that case.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant is philosopher of the 18th century and his best work, Deontology, the study of the nature of duty and obligation, is addressed in My Sister’s Keeper through selfishness, hand picking a child, and keeping promises. My Sister’s Keeper is a fictional story about the Fitzgerald family that has many conflicts within the family walls. The conflicts not only disappoint the family, but would disappoint Immanuel Kant and Deontologists as well. Deontologists believe that action alone are solely right or wrong, the consequences do not matter, even if the outcome is good.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New Zealand has seen the ban of cosmetics testing on animals. Isaac Davidson, reporter for the New Zealand Herald released an article on 31st March 2015, explaining the government’s decision to ban the use of animals for cosmetic research. The topic of animal testing is taken very seriously around the world, with the public of Britain protesting for decades and addressing their government to take the necessary steps to ban it. An example of this is the Lush cosmetics campaign, which took place on the 24th April 2012. In the 1980’s American animal rights activist Henry Spira, bought a full-page in the New York Times with an outcry to help protect the animals used in cosmetics testing.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics