John Scopes Case Study

Parties Involved in the Case The parties involved in the case were John Scopes, Clarence Darrow, William Jennings Bryan, and John Raulston (Linder, 2008). John Scopes was a young high school biology who was found to be guilty of violation. Clarence Darrow was a successful lawyer who defended scopes (Linder, 2008). William Jennnings Bryan was a religious politician who was the plaintiff in the case (Linder, 2008). John Raulston was the judge of the Rhea County Courthouse in Dayton, Tennessee (Linder, 2008).
Date and place Where the Case was Tried In July of 1925, the case was disputed in Dayton, Tennessee (Linder, 2008). The initial trial occurred in the criminal court of Rhea County Courthouse in Dayton, Tennessee (Linder, 2008). In the …show more content…
Therefore, the Butler Act “held unconstitutional statutes prohibiting the teaching of evolution as violative of the First Amendment” (Linder, 2008, Retrieved from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/appctdec.htm). The case of “Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 89 S.Ct. 266, 21 L.Ed.2d 228” aided in this disapproval of the Butler Act. (Linder, 2008, Retrieved from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/appctdec.htm).
Educational Implications This case appears to be a legal precedent for educational institutions, because it illustrates the importance of theoretical analysis, a state’s administrative rights over public education, constitutional rights of citizens (Essex, 2015). Theoretical analysis is often emphasized in education, which is enables students to utilize critical thinking, researching abilities and conducting the act of the scientific method. It is evident, scientific discovery is valid on the origin of Earth and human inhabitants. As a legal precedent, the case illustrates that personal preferences cannot be utilized to discriminate a citizen’s belief system. Public education includes a variety of demographics, and the constitutional rights protect citizens’ freedom of