Examples Of Informal Fallacies

Improved Essays
Informal fallacies appeal to the ignorance of an inadequately supported argument and can be observed in everyday scenarios. Although many are incognizant of their effect on communication, being aware of the format of an argument can aid an individual in reaching their desired conclusion to any situation they are encountered with. When an argument is presented with limited alternatives, the omission of other choices provides the argument with a false dilemma causing the arguer in the discussion to be limited in their response. If an argument is approached with a false dilemma, the arguer is guiding the defendant to respond in the way that best supports his desired outcome. By limiting the freedom to explore other alternatives, the defendant is left to constitute a response that may not be in their best interest.
In my personal experience, I have found that being more perceptive when confronted
…show more content…
A false dilemma is an argument that gives unlikely outcomes as if they are the only two possible outcomes that could arise from the situation at hand. The arguer then removes the least favorable option leaving the most desirable to be considered as the conclusion of the argument. This argument could have been corrected had the person the argument was directed at had chosen something other than the two options that were provided to him, such as “Are there really only two options?” or “Is there another alternative?”. The argument could then be justified because some or all of the other possible outcomes would be weighed as choices for the conclusion of the argument. By not limiting the number of choices the member had in his defense, the arguer then presents the member the flexibility to defend himself in any way he deems appropriate. If the person would have asked those questions instead of choosing M or U the argument would have taken this form: Either M or U / P //

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Book about Rhetoric: is it Worth Reading? Jay Heinrichs is a New York Times best selling author thanks to his book, Thank You For Arguing; what Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach us about the Art of Persuasion . He is a leading expert in the study of persuasion and applies his knowledge of ethos, pathos, and logos to construct his position. Heinrichs also brings to play what he has learned from his 25 year long career as a journalist, as well as his lifelong study of rhetoric and applies it to his book.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his article “Argumentation in a Culture of Discord”, Cioffi criticizes the way our contemporary media view argument and offer s his own perspective on view argument and argumentation. On our contemporary media view argument, Cioffi believes that our current media fail to offer a forum for actual genuine debate: they are neither pursuing real inquiries nor grappling with complex puzzle. Instead what they offer is the easy route: they provide two sides of arguments and the audience have to pick one over another. In other words, the media way of arguments fail to take counter-arguments into consideration. Thus, the problems arise with the media definition is that our younger generations fail to understand the concept of “arguments” proposed…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a child, I worshipped the invincible heroes in movies who got whatever they wanted, and I aspired to be like them. Although in real life, their clever and well thought out schemes would not be easy to implement or even devise, simply presenting an effective argument may be enough to manipulate an audience. To do so, the author must consider maintaining a connection with the audience, who may potentially disapprove of the argument or even find it offensive. To begin an argument, one can use a humble and frank tone towards the audience to state his purpose. He should take care not to use extreme or harsh diction or immediately present radical ideas.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Case For Rhetoric Debate and argument are a pinnacle foundation of speech in the world. Jay Heinrichs Thank You For Arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion, is like the bible of rhetoric and argument. Heinrichs is a former editor of many different publishers including: Rodale Inc., and Dartmouth Alumni Magazine. His book, is the leading book in the introduction to rhetoric, and is used in thousands of classrooms every year.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jay Heinrich in the Introduction to Thank You for Arguing, "Open Your Eyes", illustrates several different personal narratives to contrast how persuasion and rhetoric can steady an argument. Heinrich supports his claims by describing that arguments "lies behind political labeling, advertising, jargon, voices, gestures, and guilt trips; it forms a real life Matrix, the supreme software that drives our social lives" (Heinrich, 4). The author's purpose is to point out different usage of arguments to his readers by creating testable arguments, "(...) so I’ll reveal a rhetorical device for implanting opinions in people’s heads through sheer sleight of tongue" (Heinrich, 6), so that readers can differate between using rhetorics or not. The writer writes in an reasonable tone, so that the readers can learn about the values of rhetorics and the benefits of studying upon the values they can be used in their own lives.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Rutland model studies a dilemma from three different points of view: the consequentialist approach, which considers results; the deontological approach, which focuses on personal rights; and the aspirational approach, which considers the person whom is making the decision and who they want to be. Consequentialist Approach. The consequentialist approach, also known as Utilitarianism, studies the consequences of an outcome and considers “the greatest good for the greatest number of people without causing harm” (Ethical Toolkit, n.d.). By evaluating the overall happiness level created in response to each option will help determine which course of action to take.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summer Reading Assignment: Thank You for Arguing The introduction of Thank You for Arguing covers a brief history of rhetoric, introducing its beginnings in ancient Greece and its impact on Roman orators. Jay Heinrichs details the effect of rhetoric on America’s founders, the principles used in the making of the Bible and the Constitution, and how it inspired Shakespeare and Cicero, as well as how rhetoric has faded since the 1800s. Heinrichs declares his purpose for writing Thank You for Arguing as to “lead you through this ill-known world of argument…to use logic as a convincing tool, smacking down fallacies and building airtight assertions” (Heinrichs 5). Heinrichs hooks his audience by using the very thing he teaches about: rhetoric.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political Party Argument Much like today, people have struggled over what parties to join; Democratic or Republican, but in 1792 The Democratic-Republican and The Federalist where the two main parties. Each having its respective owner's, Alexander Hamilton runs The Federalists, and Thomas Jefferson runs the Democratic-Republicans. So, for presidency by any means the better choice would be The Federalist Party, because of their great ties with other foreign countries, also there view on how the government should be run, and to prove all of this, what they have done to advance the nation as a whole. The Federalists wanted a loose interpretation, but as some may argue that having a loose interpretation of the constitution would lead into some possessing people too much power.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most importantly, I learned that the consideration of different viewpoints can greatly benefit any…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Omitting any statements or anyone not concerned an expert on a subject matter helps to eliminate fallacy. Avoid any assumptions and speculations that cannot prove true. Example, the street corner ice cream vender speaks about returning to college will guarantee a job. The unqualified authority (ice cream vender) is not be the best authority on returning to school.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguing and debating is an important part of the human existence. Yet few people find themselves able to properly argue and win. One man, Jay Heinrichs, uses his knowledge in rhetoric, the art of arguing and persuasion, to write Thank You for Arguing. Heinrichs splits his book into four parts, offense, defense, advanced offence, and advanced defense. The first part, “Offense,” lays out the basics of arguing, starting with “Set Your Goals” so that you know what to argue about and how to go about arguing.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Logical Fallacies 1. Argumentum ad ignorantiam. This is an argument, which refers to the lack of the knowledge of another person in the disputable issues, which are related to the subject of the debate. A speaker mentions such facts, which another person cannot prove is not true.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I also now understand how to better deal with situations that could get a negative reaction out of…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fallacies

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fallacies Mistaken for Good Arguments Throughout pages 72-84, the textbook focused on specific forms of bad arguments that are a result of some sort of irrelevance premises have to a conclusion. The term for these bad arguments are fallacies, and there are various different ones. They include, the Red Herring, the Easy Target, the Appeal to Fear, the Appeal to Pity, the Appeal to Popularity, the Appeal to either Novelty or Tradition, the Ad Hominem, and the Appeal to Ignorance.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays