In my personal experience, I have found that being more perceptive when confronted …show more content…
A false dilemma is an argument that gives unlikely outcomes as if they are the only two possible outcomes that could arise from the situation at hand. The arguer then removes the least favorable option leaving the most desirable to be considered as the conclusion of the argument. This argument could have been corrected had the person the argument was directed at had chosen something other than the two options that were provided to him, such as “Are there really only two options?” or “Is there another alternative?”. The argument could then be justified because some or all of the other possible outcomes would be weighed as choices for the conclusion of the argument. By not limiting the number of choices the member had in his defense, the arguer then presents the member the flexibility to defend himself in any way he deems appropriate. If the person would have asked those questions instead of choosing M or U the argument would have taken this form: Either M or U / P //