Realist assumptions believe human nature has a dark side therefore I would advise President Obama to stay out the war. Niccole Machiavelli said “Therefor it is necessary for a prince, who wishes to maintain himself, to learn how now to be good, and to use this knowledge and not use it, according to the necessity of the case.” This directly states that we need to maintain the US as a county therefor being good (helping another country) is not an option. As a realist perspective advisor I would side with President blank blank. I wouldn’t see his actions as cruel. I would see him as a powerful lead that isn’t being praised, he has to be feared to maintain his role. Machiavelli said “All men are reputed for certain qualities which they are either praised or blamed.” As a liberalist advisor for President Obama I would approve US interest in the conflict. A liberalist assumption is that human nature has a better side. Another assumption is “Cooperation is possible in the international environment thanks to commerce, international institutions, democratic states, and international law.” This directly states that as nation states we have to cooperate together to face international conflicts. Finding a compromise is possible because human nature has a better side. I would advise Obama to team up with NGOs that are helping Syrian refugees. This is yet another liberal assumption, "NGOs are often important.” As a liberal advisor I am optimistic about human nature and the international environment. I am suppose to make the world a better place, with that being said as an advisor I would encourage US involvement to help stop the Syrian civil war. As President Obama’s advisor with a realist view I would suggest that this situation could get out of hand. Due to my pessimistic view of human nature I would infer that this conflict will spread to the US. I would suggest that the US send a
Realist assumptions believe human nature has a dark side therefore I would advise President Obama to stay out the war. Niccole Machiavelli said “Therefor it is necessary for a prince, who wishes to maintain himself, to learn how now to be good, and to use this knowledge and not use it, according to the necessity of the case.” This directly states that we need to maintain the US as a county therefor being good (helping another country) is not an option. As a realist perspective advisor I would side with President blank blank. I wouldn’t see his actions as cruel. I would see him as a powerful lead that isn’t being praised, he has to be feared to maintain his role. Machiavelli said “All men are reputed for certain qualities which they are either praised or blamed.” As a liberalist advisor for President Obama I would approve US interest in the conflict. A liberalist assumption is that human nature has a better side. Another assumption is “Cooperation is possible in the international environment thanks to commerce, international institutions, democratic states, and international law.” This directly states that as nation states we have to cooperate together to face international conflicts. Finding a compromise is possible because human nature has a better side. I would advise Obama to team up with NGOs that are helping Syrian refugees. This is yet another liberal assumption, "NGOs are often important.” As a liberal advisor I am optimistic about human nature and the international environment. I am suppose to make the world a better place, with that being said as an advisor I would encourage US involvement to help stop the Syrian civil war. As President Obama’s advisor with a realist view I would suggest that this situation could get out of hand. Due to my pessimistic view of human nature I would infer that this conflict will spread to the US. I would suggest that the US send a