William Bulger Moral Theory

Introduction
There are different types of moral theories that have been presented by various philosophers to justify or rebuke certain actions or decisions. These theories include utilitarianism theory, the Confucianism theory as well as the social obligation theory. Most often, the question of morality presents various ethical complexities that result in disagreements on whether an action or decision is morally right or wrong. This is because the nature of morality is that there lacks an objective truth of what is morally right or wrong. In presenting my argument, I am cognizant of the fact that there are no unanimously established moral rules or values in society. In this regard, I argue that William Bulger’s decision to remain loyal to his …show more content…
It is about whether a specific action increases or decreases happiness. The utilitarianism moral theory holds that individuals should do whatever it takes to promote their personal happiness. Utilitarianism theory holds that an action is adjudged right or wrong solely on its consequences. Moreover, everyone’s happiness matters in judging whether an action is morally wrong or right. The happiness of Bulger and his brother matters, not just the happiness of the society. By Bulger assisting the police in apprehending his brother, this would have reduced not only his brother’s happiness but his happiness as well. This is particularly so when we consider the social solidarity theory. According to the social solidarity theory, individuals have moral responsibilities to those with whom they share some form of history, (Sandel, 2009). Accordingly, individuals owe a special obligation to their family members. In doing so, Sandel (2009) argues that such obligations should be fulfilled while ensuring that one does not violate the rights of others. Consequently, we can argue that Bulger does not violate the rights of anyone in deciding to remain loyal to his brother. He is only fulfilling his familial solidarity …show more content…
However, Sandel (2009) argues that social obligations of solidarity are in their inherent nature inward pointing as they are outward pointing. As such, Bulger’s decision can be inferred to be a form of inward pointing social solidarity that according to utilitarianism, offers the greatest amount of happiness. Closely related to the theory of social solidarity is the theory of Confucianism. According to Rachels (1999), Confucianism theory holds that individuals should be partial to their family relations. This is by maintaining and sustaining familial relationships based on communal rituals intended to maintain social harmony. As per the Confucian ethical theory, some circumstances warrant the need for individuals not to be compelled to present evidence against their family members. This is because of the affectionate attachment that is characteristic of familial relationships, (Rachels, 1999). In any case, it is possible for the police to arrest Bulger’s brother without receiving information from Bulger himself. As such, Confucianism as an ethical theory gives Bulger an opportunity not to present information to the police regards the whereabouts of his