Arguments Against Capitalism

Superior Essays
Title
Introduction (Thesis)
America’s system of capitalism is a hot bed of inequality.
Based on Rawlsian theory America’s current economic system, capitalism, is unjust. In Rawls, Property-Owning Democracy, and Democratic Socialism by Tom Malleson, capitalism is rejected for having unequal political power, unequal opportunity, and unequal wealth distribution. Unequal wealth is the major issue as it affects both political power and opportunity. Those who have more wealth can donate more to political campaigns and therefore have a louder voice in elections. Opportunity, such as access to education, is also affected by wealth. Those from low socioeconomic standing are quite likely to go to schools with low academic achievement. The paper gives
…show more content…
They believe the redistribution of wealth is amoral because it infringes of these rights. Wendy Milling, author of the article Without Question, Capitalism is Supremely Moral, bases her support of capitalism on “man’s rights”, but she does not explicitly define these rights. From her attack on the distribution of property one can assume she is a supporter Locke’s, therefore, the fundamental rights she is referencing are the pursuit of life, liberty, and property. Milling refutes the idea of equality of opportunity because she believes that the “[redistribution of] wealth is… [robbery].” Based solely on Locke’s ideas, redistribution is an unjust action. Perhaps capitalism is a moral system based on the pursuit property, but even using an antiquated Lockean framework it is still unjust. Capitalism does not allow fully for the pursuit of liberty or the pursuit of life and it does not fully allow for pursuit of …show more content…
Those with more money have a louder voice in a system that is touted as being the gold standard of democracy. Wealthy Americans can donate large amounts to campaign contributions and pay for lobbyist directly. This gives a select few much more political power than should be allowed. Those who are wealthy also shape public ideology. The owners of media are among the super-rich and therefore “[the media is] dominated by the interests of the wealthy” (MacEwan 8) When the news has an implicit bias in favor of the rich the majority are used to further goals that may not be beneficial for them. .There is reliance on the rich to create jobs. “Political authorities at all levels believe that if they are unfriendly to business interests, they will run the risk of slowing business activity, reducing unemployment activity, reducing employment, and thus alienating voters” (MacEwan 9). The super-rich have the majority of power in American politics even though they make up a scant minority of citizens. This is inherently unfair and under a system of democratic socialism this would not be allowed. It is of upmost importance that our economic system changes to make a more equal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Materialism is the theory of understanding society and individual approach. In Frederick Engels paper, the capitalistic structure is explained, how it was created, how it influences society and what conflicts it brought. My paper is first going to talk about the historical materialism and establish what Engels meant by that. Afterword, this paper going to discus about the fundamental contradiction in capitalism. Furthermore, I am going to expend on that concept by applying it on two different quotes from Engels paper.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “As of September 14, 2016, Britannica.com listed on its website. . . Karl Heinrich Marx a revolutionary, historian, sociologist, and economist was born May 5th 1818 in the city Trier located in Rhine, Prussia. Marx was the oldest boy of nine children. In 1835 attended the University of Bonn for a year then went to Berlin to study philosophy and law. Eight years later Marx married Jenny von Westphalen who was smart and attractive to the eye.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today in America we live in the richest country in the history of the world, but that reality means very little because much of that wealth is controlled by a very small handful of individuals. America is now one of the worst major developed countries in terms of economic equality in the entire world, and at the gap is at its worst point since the 1920’s. The middle-class of the nation has been slowly disappearing and having its money go up towards the upper-class. And to make it all worse 58% of all new wealth in the United States goes towards the top 1% of earners since 2009. Wealth and income inequality is one of the hardest issues to fix that the United States currently faces, because of the Supreme Court decision in 2010 on the case Citizens…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Amazing Grace Summary

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages

    America prides itself on being a democratic government and a land of equal opportunity, but does it live up to those standards? Incoming inequality is growing in American society, and the effectiveness of democracy is being threatened by this increasing inequality. While America has claimed to make strides toward racial and gender inequality there is a growing gap between the haves and have nots. This income gap is increasing rapidly between the rich and the middle class and the middle class is now diminishing: “The rich get richer, the poor get poorer” is not just a cliché - rather, this concept is a theoretical process called “wealth concentration.” The already-wealthy are growing richer because they have the resources to invest wealth to…

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth Inequality Essay

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1976 , the wealthiest one percent of Americans owned 19% of all the private material wealth in the US Today, they own over 40% of all wealth. Their share now exceeds the wealth owned by the bottom 92% of the US population combined. (Edward N. Wolff, Top Heavy: A Study of Increasing Inequality in America Twentieth Century Fund: 1995). From 1976 till the present , the power of the wealthy has increased greatly meaning their power has increased as well. When a certain group constantly gains power they will abuse it and this can be seen with the unfair wealth distribution in this country.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the United States currently faces a diminishing middle class, many of it’s citizens seem to be attracted to changing the capitalist economic system in place today. While the rich exhaust their privileges, the lower class finds itself in a cycle of poverty. Although fear of any socialist reforms crippled the country in the twentieth century, the popularity of current European socialist countries have those suffering in the United States beginning to consider a socialist economy. While capitalism emphasizes money and individuals owning enterprises and production, socialism puts the majority of its emphasis on its people, cumulatively owning production and distribution (Archer). However, the majority of the country stays true to the economy in…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Income and Wealth Inequality of America As a capitalist nation, the United State of America is facing a serious problem, which is the inequality of wealth and income. In pace with the growth of the economy, the rich people are getting richer and the poor people are getting poorer. The gap between the rich and poor is widening unprecedentedly fast. Why is that happening?…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This causes difficulties running the country as a whole. While the wealthy “elite” stay in power and become more wealthy, the poor cannot do much to improve themselves. This leaves a wide gap in the middle class between the rich and…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental feature of a true democracy is total equality. The United States of America has failed to obtain this recognition because of its emphasis on an ideology that places value on greed, wastefulness, and selfishness. Capitalism has taken hold of America’s economy, society, and culture creating a country that is plagued in disparity. Yet the American people refuse to accept the inherent solution to its problem, democratic socialism. The ideals of democratic socialism are designed to create a more equal society, in pursuit of establishing a true democracy, by having a democratically elected government take part in redistributing wealth, providing public services, and organizing a state’s trade.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth inequality in today's society also known as the wealth gap, is growing. The top one percent makes twenty-five times more than the average family (Close 2016). This glaring inequality frequently brings up the question of what ought to be done with the distribution of wealth and resources. American Political Philosopher, John Rawls’, bases his argument on the premise that there should be an equal distribution of wealth in society. Robert Nozick, one of Rawls' main critics, demonstrates how distributive justice and an equal distribution of wealth conflicts with a person's individual liberty.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls and Karl Marx both see equality as an important value in human society; indeed, they both see it as something people are entitled to and as the foundation upon which the ideal society is built. However, they diverge drastically in how they conceptualize the way an egalitarian society would operate and how they believe such a society could be achieved. Concerning the former, Marx envisioned a communist utopia, whereas Rawls was a strong believer in liberal democracy. In terms of the latter, Marx was a staunch believer in proletarian revolution, while Rawls believed in perfecting the existing system through democratic reforms. Their contrasting visions stem partly from the different periods in which they wrote.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I’m sure that you have heard about the chaos enveloping us here in France. I know that rumors have been spreading about the demise of the upper and middle classes and that you must be worried about our safety. I should assure you that we are in no current danger from the revolutionaries here. In fact, I believe that if these revolutions are successful, they will continue to spread much-needed change against the nobility while eventually giving way to more moderate policies that will help us in the long term. If the revolutions in France and Germany succeed, economic liberalism and its proponents will eventually dominate Europe’s political and financial systems.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Paper 2 Is it possible to make capitalism just? Capitalism is defined as an economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. (Wikipedia) Capitalism is a social system that focuses and is based upon the individual rights. Capitalism structures markets, determine ownership rights, and provide legal enforcement of trade restrictions which makes it an institutional system. Politically it is a system that is built on freedom.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays