Social Contract Essay

Improved Essays
The Social Contract The purpose of the social contract is to bring people together in a society, and then to decide the positions of people in their society. They do this by transferring their rights to another person through a social contract. Once a person leaves the state of nature and is brought into a society, a social contract is the only way for the individual to benefit from what a commonwealth and partnership can bring but also have some sort of obligation to contribute to that society as well. Although a society cannot form without a Social Contract, the terms of the social contract and the way it is to be entered into needs to be changed, because it simply doesn’t work for the world we live in today. A person is brought into a …show more content…
The one of the biggest flaws is brought by this question: Can a person be born into a social contract? Naturally one would say that a person cannot be born into a contract, because the moment a person is born they are not conscious in themselves enough to agree to a contract, and a contract must have a conscious signer. Many argue that the way it can be done is a person agrees to the contract when they come of age, but by that point they had already been living within a sovereign that they had never agreed to for so long. Hobbes argues in his book Leviathan that sometimes, rights can be transferred by inference, not just by express. Express is when a person signs their rights to the sovereign, using language such as “I agree, I consent,” but joining the sovereign by inference, Hobbes argues, can be done through words or actions. Actions can simply include using the sovereign’s resources and safety for yourself, and by doing that you have automatically consented to the social contract. So if a child uses the protection and resources of the sovereign, Hobbes argues he already has signed himself into the …show more content…
In the United States, women have come very far in making our positions in society equal to men, brining us closer to absolute equality. Although there are some things women still face in America, there are many other parts of the world where women have little to no rights at all. Carole Pateman claims that the social contract is sexual as well as social, and that is because men have a political right over women, giving them orderly access over women’s bodies. This can still be seen in the world we live in today, an example being the practice of Female Genital Cutting still seen in many parts of Africa as common practice. Although an ancient tradition, it is still something seen on an everyday basis in many countries, and it is continued because of the social contract of those countries placing women as an inferior subordinate to men, giving men the right to dictate what is done to a woman’s

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Women throughout the centuries have been forced to make incredibly difficult decisions, some of which are painful and self-sacrificing. The fight for Women’s Rights has been an ongoing battle with many accomplishments, including but not exclusive to the right to vote, the right to an education, Roe vs. Wade, and the ability to have a career typically held by men. Even in this modern age, with opportunities once seen as a fantasy being a reality, women are still unequal in many ways around the world. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, women were almost entirely reliant on their male counterpart. Women did not work, but rather stayed at home to attend to the every need of the husband and children.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an excerpt from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, he describes his theory about the conditions of a society which has no governing body to control it. When there is no government, we live in a state of nature; a state of total freedom where we can do whatever we want at any time. If there is no government, there are no set laws, and therefore no limits on human actions. There are also no formal consequences for actions that may cause harm to others. You could do anything you want if it will benefit you since there is no sure punishment.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In her book The Sexual- Contract, Carole Pateman made emphasise in the different ways society respond to sexual differences, and how inequality is based on sexual differences. Pateman also explains how The Social Contract is also a sexual-social pact (p.3). To comprehend this she had to analyze The Social Contract of Philosopher like Rousseau, Locke and Hobbes that were well used to create the Civil Rights, even though those theories focused on the power of men over women.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of the social contract theory has been the creation of one government with the people and a contract written with policies and laws but, if the government breaks the contract then the people has the right to make another new government with a new contract. This is a theory benefits citizens and people when government only works when they are protecting the humans rights. Thomas Hobbes theory was that people needed to be ruled by one, either a king or queen because they don’t know the good and bad of decisions and that if people get to do what they want then chaos will be released. Hobbes believed people had no rights and should be ruled by one which was called monarchy. Thomas believed that human needed government only for protection…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Oppression Against Women

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Even in biology, to explain female parts, they had to use that of men as a reference point (Ousdshoorn, 111). Not until the 20th century was a man raping his wife seen as a punishable offence (Ramirez, Feb 23). These acts of oppression continue to grow like a wildfire because of our traditional belief system in the society. Inasmuch as we try to deny it and hide under the shadow of the ‘21st century’, we still have mentalities of our forefathers, which uplift men in anyway possible, and seconds women to men. We see that race is a constant determinant of opportunities and goodwill- who is favoured more in a social, political and economical situation, a white middle class man or an aboriginal…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a patriarchal society, women are dominated by men who hold all authority over them. The insidious nature of this ideology, although not as accepted as it once was, has stood the test of time; long enough that the idea of men being superior to women can appear to be natural. Since the beginning of time women have been depicted as unstable, taken the blame, or have been subject to discrimination and stripped of their rights due to the rules of a patriarchal society. Women’s rights were possibly taken away ever since Eve bit into the apple and committed the first sin. Rights that are perhaps only given to Men, as written in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, “that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to leave the state of nature individuals must consent to the social contract in order to form a commonwealth. For a social contract to be enacted all members of society must agree to give up certain rights provided in the state of nature to create a civil society that benefits them all. The commonwealth for all three signifies an impartial power which makes the final decisions concerning matters in civil society. For Hobbes the social contract is created because people live in fear that another will harm them in their quest for self-preservation. While Locke believes that a social contract is needed to create an impartial judge because men cannot be trusted not to take justice too far, once the common good is no longer at the forefront.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the comparison of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau and their respective ideas of The Social Contract I would like to begin by breaking down what the Social Contract is and all its encompassing ideas. The concept of social contract theory is that before civilization man lived in the state of nature in its purest form. There was no central body of governance and no law to regulate society. This meant there were hardships and oppression on certain sections of the society because they had nobody fighting for them. To overcome from these hardships people entered into agreements known as “social contracts”.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No morality exists. Everyone lives in constant fear. Because of this fear, no one is really free. However, in the state of nature everyone has the right to everything because there is no limit to natural rights. His theory that common security should be favored and that a bit of individual liberty should be sacrificed by each person to achieve it is an inaccurate policy. Hobbes believes the contract is a mutual transferring of rights.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Social Contract Theory is an agreement between the people and the government that the people will obey the government as long as the government serves in a capacity that protects the rights of the people and furthers the good for the general will. Before we consent, we exist in the state of nature. In the state of nature, we follow natural law. Natural law comes from God. Natural law gives us our natural rights, which we are promised because of our personhood.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to judge a situation using Social Contract theory, we have to understand a few principles behind the theory first. These include the Social Contract, John Rawl 's Principle of Justice, and the Difference Principle. Using these three ideas, we can determine what constitutes a community of people, what makes a moral rule correct, and which correct moral rules would be accepted by a community of people. The Social Contract is this idea that when people come together to form a community, moral rules must be agreed upon that benefit everyone in the community. Not only that, but the Social Contract needs some kind of established governing body to enforce the agreed upon rules.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it a human rights violation, or is it a matter of culture? Despite the fact that female circumcision dates back centuries, the topic stepping forward as an important ethical debate in the national arena did not happen until recently. Female circumcision can be defined as the removal of a portion, or all of, the external female genitalia, specifically the clitoris. In the Americas, the law deems the procedure illegal. It is viewed as unnecessary, wrong, and cruel, but for many African cultures the procedure is deeply rooted in the nations’ cultures and traditions as a rite of passage into adulthood.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays