By this phase, both males and females can utilize past training from single-sex education to aid them in being diligent within the coed classroom. Females can catch males up in classroom activities without being much of a distraction. Students use their new found skill set to think more effectively and consider various solutions. They learn to compromise over issues that are not as valuable to them. Student and teacher relations also influence children to progress through development. Relationships between other sexes and instructors become even more essential for a robust emotional development. As classmates look for affection with other students, males can often share close bonds with females and share more emotional details. In doing so, females implement their “care perspective” and comfort the male. Females are more likely to consider the compromise whereas male students like to take lead, evolving into an increasingly stable class environment during high …show more content…
Since both sides of the argument present a valid point to the topic, one can say having single-sex classes and coed lunch, recess, and fieldtrips would an ideal compromise. Boys can develop naturally to where their biological standards set them. Females grow significantly sooner than males, therefore, it is obvious that they are also needing to be taught strategically in the beginning of their developmental process. Instructors can teach curriculum based on the biological needs of each sex. By intermingling coed lunch, recess, and field trips, educators can create cognitive awareness of the differing perspectives in which the opposite gender has to contribute. Single-sex education can be advantageous in kindergarten through eighth grade with incorporated coed lunches and recess to increase the social and/or emotional aspect of development. When reaching high school however, children need even more of a social environment to understand of the diverse perspectives around them to be able to assimilate into the real