The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… The value of human life and the right to live are both strong ethical reasons to abolish the death penalty. What gives any one person the right to say that one life out values that of another, or that someone does not deserve the right to live their life? When we consider that people have learned from their mistakes and turned their lives around for the better after committing serious crimes, some ethics that people have make them reconsider capital punishment of death. We are all human which means we can all make mistakes, and the harsh sentence of death is irrevocable to be handed down for a lapse in judgment. Some people are on death row because they were defending their own life against another, but lack the resources to prove their innocence stops them from proving this. That is one of the reasons why there are legal issues surrounding the death …show more content…
If not only to provide justice and equal punishment for certain crimes, but to also help others refrain from committing such heinous crimes that can be punishable by death. Saving the lives of innocent people that suffer at the hands of criminals should be worth the ethical and moral issues that accompany the debate of the death penalty. There will always be reasons on both sides of this debate suggesting that one or the other is correct, because there are people that have been affected in different ways by capital punishment. Human nature has also suffered from people having to pay for the sins of others, which makes a difference for the innocent people that are put on death row. But the consequences that those people deal with could also be prevented by making good moral and ethical decisions to not put themselves in situations that could pose a possibility to being sentenced to death. In a perfect world there would be no need to have a death penalty, but we do not live in a perfect world and without certain laws and punishments to protect us we could be facing horrible outcomes much worse than the possibly innocent people being put on death row. Finding the data for both sides of the arguments providing information that makes me suggest that the death penalty is a good thing, as long as it is not being abused by those in

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There must be an ultimate solution for the most heinous crime, because after all; life is the most precious thing we have and by having the death penalty, it will act as a deterrent for future capital crimes. Some might argue that by taking their lives you are doing them a favor of ending their life quickly instead of them having to spend the rest of their life in jail. However, when looking at the standard process of a case with death penalty being the court decision, the decision is almost always appealed, not only once, but a maximum of seven times showing that these murderers do price their life much more than having to spend their life in prison. With that said the death penalty is a just solution for murder as it actively deters people from committing murder.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    nobody deserves to die for committing crime by mistake or without conscious, so the main point for human rights examinations must be that the death penalty is disproportionate with fundamental human rights standards. "Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."(Martin Luther King). Capital punishment may have impact in expanding violence mentalities in a society which might increase the quantity of crimes rate in countries that practiced it.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lethal injections have been a controversial topic for many centuries. People have many opinions as to if lethal injections are humane or if the act violates the Constitution. The use of lethal injections became a topic of interest around the 1980s. The first lethal injection execution was administered by Dr. Ralph Gray in 1982. The execution went successfully and from there the use of lethal injections became more popular, which started arguments as people expressed their opinions.…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment The first recorded execution was in 1608 (Fridell). This form of punishment has been around for many years and should continue to be used based on its effectiveness. It has its perks and it’s downfalls, but needs to be put in place to keep order in our society. If it wasn’t for the death penalty I believe our most violent individuals would stop at nothing to commit these outrageous crimes.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is viewed as a heavy subject with many moral issues tide to it but in reality the death penalty is one of the easiest law out there even with the shackles of moral impute. In the end the punishment should fit the crime no matter the moral ideology. People should not be arguing that the death penalty is below the society that has been created through brutal acts. The death penalty in all forms is made for the protection of others.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Keeping the Death Penalty When people make a bad choice and get sent to jail they are only in there for a short period of time before going home. For some people they are in jail for a lifetime, and they get the death penalty. Some people do not think the death penalty should still be allowed because of its cruelty. The death penalty should remain as an acceptable punishment because it can be used as a deterrent for serious crimes, other criminals can learn from other death penalty recipients, and the death penalty is by far more humane than past executions forms.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is wrong, inhumane and ineffective. Every year billions of dollars and thousands of man hours go into trying to take convicts lives. These felons are men and women who have committed murders. Some people may say that since they took someone else's life they don't deserve to live themselves, but I disagree with that. Taking the life of the killer won't bring the victim back and is unethical, expensive and unfairly or wrongly given sometime.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is better to have the criminal think about the crime they committed. When the death penalty is abolished human rights will be respected, we will have more money for our economy, and the criminal system will be more…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most of the pros contradict the cons in facts and provide little insight. As a result of information gathered for this paper along with debates and discussions with other criminal justice teachers my opinion on the death penalty is that it should be abolished. I believe the cons out way the pros. The following are a list of countries who still use the death penalty; AFGHANISTAN, ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA, BAHAMAS, BAHRAIN, BANGLADESH, BARBADOS, BELARUS, BELIZE, BOTSWANA, CHAD, CHINA, COMOROS, CONGO (Democratic Republic), CUBA, DOMINICA, EGYPT, EQUATORIAL GUINEA, ETHIOPIA, GAMBIA, GUATEMALA, GUINEA, GUYANA, INDIA, INDONESIA, IRAN, IRAQ, JAMAICA, JAPAN, JORDAN, KOREA (North), KUWAIT, LEBANON, LESOTHO, LIBYA, MALAYSIA, NIGERIA, OMAN, PAKISTAN, PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, QATAR, RUSSIA, SAINT KITTS & NEVIS, SAINT LUCIA, SAINT VINCENT & GRENADINES, SAUDI ARABIA, SINGAPORE, SOMALIA, SOUTH SUDAN, SUDAN, SYRIA, TAIWAN, THAILAND, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, UGANDA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VIET NAM, YEMEN, and ZIMBABWE. From this list I could identify only a few first world countries that still use it.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The issue at state here is the idea of abortion and if it is ethical or unethical. I will be arguing that abortion is unethical. Abortion is unethical because if human life is sacred then all actions should be made to protect it. Human life must be protected; not killed while still in the womb. “The fetus has no moral status, it is not morally wrong to destroy something that has no moral status.”…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The declaration of human rights says that everyone – yes everyone - has the right to life, liberty and security. But doesn’t the death penalty take this right away from each individual sat on death row? Human life is a valuable thing, so valuable that even the worst murderers should not be deprived of the value of their lives. The value of the offender’s life cannot be destroyed by an offence – even if they have killed someone.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning The Death Penalty

    • 1541 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Death Penalty is a punishment used in our justice system, some think it’s bad some think it’s good we all have our own opinions against this argument and some hate the fact it’s an option to kill others even though they knew what they did and deserve the punishment for. The argument in the death penalty matter leads to various conclusions, most are opinions but they are very well detailed opinions toward the matter of why we should have it in our justice system and why we should not have it in our justice system. The justice system is in a bind between whether to ban the death penalty or not, there are many different reasons why we should and should not have the death penalty, it gets rid of all the people who disobey the law or take an…

    • 1541 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, the death penalty has remained a longstanding decision with no likely end in sight. As it stands, capital sentencing is still highly discretionary allowing for the affluence of extra legal factors in determining its imposition. As a capital punishment, the death penalty is only applied in cases that involve murder and some form of aggravating factor that heightens the seriousness of the crime or a crime against the state. In the 1970s, the landmark case of Furman v. Georgia determined that the death penalty was unconstitutional and violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of cruel and unusual punishment (Wolfgang and Riedel, 1973). However, by July of 1976, Gregg v. Georgia reinstated the death penalty as a result of states rewriting their death statutes.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Under the death penalty, innocent people might not have the opportunity to prove themselves are innocent. The time is limit, and a life is also limit. People would not have the second chance to change anything…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays