First, it is systematic bias. It has errors which arise from its estimation of quantity. It has an even dissimilarity between the results composed from the sample and the results collected from the entire population. Secondly, the sample is not representative of the entire population and finally, it is limited in generalization and inference making concerning the entire population. Quota sampling has two main advantages: Firstly, it allows researchers to sample a small groups from the group that is of most interest to the study. Secondly, it allows the researchers to consider the relationships between the subgroups that they are investigating. Disadvantages of Quota sampling include being totally representative of the population while in some cases it may not. This is because it only takes into account the selected traits of the population to form the subgroups used in sampling. Secondly, other traits may be overrepresented when sampling the subgroups. An example of a potential bias in convenience sampling is the existence of a constant difference between the results collected from the commuters and the results collected from the other residents. In quota sampling, the results collected from the commuters when the technique is totally representative may differ from those collected when the technique is not …show more content…
When focus groups are well executed, they create an acceptable environment where all the participants are at ease. This is very important because it allows them to answer questions thoughtfully in their own words and even add meaning to their provided answers. A good focus group requires adequate planning. The following details explain how to conduct a high quality focus group. They include defining a focus group, designing the focus group questions, recruiting and preparing the participants, conducting the focus group and lastly, analyzing the data. When defining the focus group for the key stakeholders at City A, you should ensure your group is large enough to ensure you generate a rich discussion about the bankruptcy issue of the city. However, it should not be too large such that some of the participants will be left out of the discussion. A good number is between five to fifteen