• Home Page
  • The Pros And Cons Of Same Sex Marriage

The Pros And Cons Of Same Sex Marriage

Superior Essays
Show More
Register to read the introduction… Why? Being gay is natural. Sure, moral fundamentalists may think it is a sin, but who are they to deny rights to those who are doing something that is just as right as a man loving a woman? Gays couples can be models of family life, offering just as much love and support for children as hetersexual couples. Gender should not be covered by marriage law, as the constitution protects US citizens from gender discrimination. While love is blind, justice should be blindfolded to gender. Since legal marriage is a creation of the state, same-sex marriage should fall under the same guidelines of non-discrimination that the state holds for all other circumstances (Baird …show more content…
It is apparent that Baehr v. Lewin may pave the way for same-sex marriages in Hawaii, but DoMA prevents other states from being forced to recognize their laws. That is why it is important that we in Texas repeal our sodomy law, and legally recognize same-sex marriage, making it possible for gays to be able to enjoy the full benefits of the life-long commitment of love. Hopefully, the generations of the future will be able to look back at gay discrimination as current society looks back at the ridiculousness of sex and race-based discrimination.

Works Cited

Bull, Chris. Scene of the Crime. The Advocate. October 27, 1998.

Cloud, John. For Better or Worse. Time Magazine. October 26, 1998. page 43.

Eskridge, William N., Jr. The Case for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: The Free Press, 1996.

Foley, Daniel R. The State of Gay Marriage. Family Advocate v20 n1 p39. Summer 1997

Kramer, Larry.Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008

Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997. pp. 50-52

United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on the Judiciary. Defense of Marriage Act : report together with dissenting views (to accompany H.R. 3396).U.S. DOCS. NO. Y

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Sacred Right Or Civil Right By Howard Moody
    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Sacred Right Or Civil Right By Howard Moody

    “SACRED RITE OR CIVIL RIGHT?” Natural of marriage has become a hot debate in America in the past two decades. There are those who agree that same-sex couple has a right to get marriage and those who disagree with it, those who dissent believe that same-sex marriage is wrong due to the religion and the laws. Through “Sacred Rite or Civil Right?” written by Howard Moody, was published in July 5, 2004 in the issue of the nation. Moody writes this article to defense traditional marriage by using chronological organization method, present example situation, asking and answering questions, the reliable sources, use statistics, and tone.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell V. Hodges Case Analysis
    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Obergefell V. Hodges Case Analysis

    Marriage now can be between a man and woman or between same-sex people. Loving v. Virginia wasn’t the only case that influenced the ruling of this case; other cases like Lawrence v. Texas, which made same-sex sexual activity in every state legal also affected this case. In the future, knowing that cases from the past can affect current ones can change the way judge’s rule in a…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Plessy V. Ferguson Summary
    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plessy V. Ferguson Summary

    The petitioner argued that a state is within its legal bounds to limit marriage to only between opposite sex, as marriage is a historical social institution whose purpose advances the state’s interest in childbearing. b) What is the name held by the respondent in this case? Summarize the respondent’s key argument. Kristen M. Perry, et al. with Thomas B. Olson speaking on behalf of the respondents.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Social/Policy Implications: The Obergefell V. Hodges Case
    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social/Policy Implications: The Obergefell V. Hodges Case

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Red Families Vs Blue Families Analysis
    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Red Families Vs Blue Families Analysis

    Are you a Democrat or a Republican? If you are a Democrat, you can learn about your blue family in this book and if you are a Republican, you can learn about your red family in this book. The purpose of this book is for you to understand the different opinions on each side of the group. This book has split America into two big parts red, more conservative and traditional side, and blue, the more modern side (Cahn and Carbone, 2010: 1). Cahn and Carbone’s book Red Families v. Blue Families: Legal Polarization and the Creation of Culture is about conservatives and modernists opinions on issues like same-sex marriages, abortion, divorces, women, and teen pregnancy.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Argument For The Legalization Of Gay Marriage
    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle's Argument For The Legalization Of Gay Marriage

    Today we live in a society where same-sex marriage is a serious thing and cannot be, but why can't it be? There are a wide variety of opinions about this topic, several points of view, some against others in favor. Aristotle said: "The only stable state is the one in which all citizens are equal before the law," that Aristotle's phrase has a lot to do with what they do with marriages between people of the same sex. Currently, gender differentiation is not an indispensable requirement for emotional and sexual human relationships. The debate on the legality and scope of same-sex marriage is one of the most agitated and dynamic in the world.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell V. Hodges Case Study
    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obergefell V. Hodges Case Study

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Limitations Clause: Halpern Vs. Canada
    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Limitations Clause: Halpern Vs. Canada

    When the common law definition of marriage mentions “one man and one woman with the exclusion of all others,” this dismisses everyone who is not heterosexual and therefore discriminates based on sex. Additionally, refusing to allow same sex couples to marry violates the equal benefits that the Charter guarantees. Since the world is slowly becoming more open minded about same sex couples, the judges’ decision to not have the common law definition marriage justified under s.1 Limitations Clause is valid because the law is not important enough to be saved, especially since the Charter explicitly includes sexual orientation as something that is protected under Equal Rights. Dating back to the origin of this common law definition of marriage, it has been proved to be outdated and unfit for the current…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Obergefell V Hodges Case Analysis
    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obergefell V Hodges Case Analysis

    I thank my colleagues for providing the background, history and facts of the particular cases leading up to 2015, after the Obergefell v Hodges opinion. I would like to briefly summarize the path and give a glimpse of what the future might look like for marriage in the United States. In 1986 in Bowers v Hardwick The Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice Warren Burger rejected a challenge to Georgia’s sodomy law. The court found that the claim that, “homosexual sodomy” was protected under the constitution was “at best facetious”.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    James Spiegel's Argument Against Homosexual Unions
    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages

    James Spiegel's Argument Against Homosexual Unions

    James Spiegel takes an opposing viewpoint in this article to one of the biggest reasons presented to support homosexual marriage – that withholding the right is unjust. He instead argues that it would keep within the bounds of justice to ban homosexual marriage. He describes heterosexual union as having a special value to society due to it an indispensable means for human birth. He continues on that thought that what has a special societal value deserves to have special recognition and sanction. When civil ordinances recognize homosexual unions as being on the same level as heterosexual unions, this causes the special value to society inherent in straight marriage to be rejected, and it is not right to deny those in straight relationships…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of In Defense Of Traditional Marriage By Ryan Anderson
    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of In Defense Of Traditional Marriage By Ryan Anderson

    There is argument all across America over whether gay and lesbians should have the right to marry. There is argument about whether legally same-sex couples have the right to marry. In the article “In Defense of Traditional Marriage” Ryan Anderson made arguments against same-sex marriages. He argues whether the government has a right to create a new civil right and then redefine marriage as well.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Sullivan Gay Marriage Summary
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Sullivan Gay Marriage Summary

    Sullivan states, “there is no public way, if one believes in equal rights under the legal philosophy, in which it should legally be denied homosexual” (404). Some people think, homosexual marriage like incestuous marriage, but history and experience suggest they are not. Equal rights are a significant component of the jurisprudence. People trust in sound philosophy, but they deny two people to get married. Homosexuals do not ask to suffer a sexual relationship like old-style marriage, but rather they want to sustain…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Defense Of Marriage Act
    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Defense Of Marriage Act

    You are writing this paper to analyze the Defense of Marriage Act, to determine the public need, to analyze the solution, to determine what challenges your Act faced and to analyze the effectiveness of the policy. Keywords: Defense of marriage act, DOMA, same sex marriage, DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT Public Need There has always been a problem with separating church from state. And even though Congressmen should separate…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Gay Marriage
    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Gay Marriage

    The government has the actual power to marry people but society helps families through the emotional parts. Since marriage has no absolute definition, it’s not fair to not let gays marry. The state should allow gays to be with each other so that they can have a “marital” relationship.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage
    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    Same-sex marriage is not only disruptive to the societal order, it also disrupts the Constitution. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was an amendment to the Constitution…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings