Peasant Revolution In Russia

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… At this time the peasants were rising up against their feudal overlords protesting the growing economic oppression under the nobles and clergy. In 1861 the serfs were freed and issued with small amounts of land, but in return they had to pay back a sum to the government, and the result ended in a mass of small farms deeply in debt. Their life was a sharp contrast to the rich landowners, who held 20% of the land in large estates. Until 1861 they belonged to their masters, who could buy and sell them like cattle. They demanded the abolishment of serfdom and feudal dues. The inefficiency of peasant-based agriculture was one of the chief indications of "backwardness" in pre-revolutionary Russia and a problem that the Bolsheviks, upon coming to power, were dedicated to overcoming. The Provisional Government had failed to address the land issue and because of that, “Most Russian peasants, numbering some twenty- three million, were still landless by the turn of the twentieth century, as most land remained in the hands of the rich landlords.” ("Peasants and Peasantry.") If one looks back in Russian history years prior to the revolution, it is immediately clear that the issue of land had been at the forefront of debate for peasants stemming all the way to the Emancipation of Serfs by Alexander II. Knowing that there had been issues with peasant land reform in the past, it’s not surprising that the peasants continued to express hostility at the notion of private land ownership. The result was, by 1917, a central mass of angry peasants increased attempts to control land by the government, and at people who profited from the land without even working it. The Russian peasants did not concern themselves overly with the political conflicts in the cities; they just wanted …show more content…
The war sped things up, but a revolution would have occurred anyway because of the unfair conditions peasants had to live in for years. At the end of the day, the working class lived their days filled with endless hours of work that wasn’t worth their wages. They could not afford to keep their families alive and since they could not own their own land their homes were cramped and drafty. They also were not able to own their own land, they had landlords who they owed too much money . Furthermore, even though World War I was a major setback in Russian civilization, Russia was not doing well at all to begin with. This brings up a question of why do revolutions even occur in the first place? The simple answer is that revolution all ties back to the working class. Revolution is in the hands of the working class. Since the working class of any society is the majority of the people, they’re the ones to please. If they are not pleased, they are the ones who have the power and dominance to make the change they wanted to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    220). With the communist state, collective farmers’ main priority was producing enough resources for the state. The food for the state came first before the peasants could receive their portion. Like the British and the German, Soviet ideology was to relocate hunger. The Soviets chose to relocate this hunger from urban areas to rural villages (p. 221).…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy is a modern idea that has been shaped throughout history by a dissatisfaction in the people with their appointed rulers. Monarchs ruled Europe for centuries before other modes of government were introduced. These rulers often viewed themselves as appointed by God, an idea some of their subjects agreed with, but most ridiculed. This conflicting opinions of the people and the rulers was the focal point of debate between the upper and lower classes. While kings and queens focused on their displaying their power and their divine right, the clergy advocated against the “evils” of the peasant-class, and the poor rallied together to demand the equality they found in Christ to be applied to their rights.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the revolution the government was corrupt and mostly paid attention to the upper class, because the government workers were full of upper -class people. Every change they make supported the rich class., and didn’t pay any attention to the middle class. So the supported the middle class and the lower class mostly. In document 1 it said that “change of government would allow fulfillment of hopes for peace, land distribution... “ this proved they were doing everything they can to help people.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russian Peasants

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Direct evidence of this is under the NEP, introduced by Lenin, grain requisitioning was ended and a tax was introduced onto peasants, thereby allowing them to keep and trade part of their produce. This therefore increased the peasants’ incentive to produce, and in the response to this production increased by 40 %. Even with the introduction of industrialisation, the majority of Russians were peasants working the land. Therefore, it was clear that in order to remain in power, Russian rulers and leaders had to keep peasants on their side. Before 1861, serfs owned no land.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How could a government lead its people if it had nothing in common with them? They refused to give land in rural areas to peasants and decided to maintain the country in the War, which disquieted the people. They believe that “instead of being a destructive force, it seemed [that the Bolsheviks] were the only party in Russia with a constructive program and the power to impose it on the country”…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Joseph Stalin also reduced the rights of many Russians. Many Russians also lost their lives under the rule of Joseph Stalin. In order to determine whether the Russian Revolution was a success or failure it is important that we consider numerous aspects. Based on the five texts provided Animal Farm (Chapters IX-X), by George Orwell, an excerpt from “Education, Literacy, and the Russian Revolution” by Megan Behrent, “Stalin and the Communist Party…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russian Peasantry

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In The Russian Peasantry, Moon states that the peasants’ agricultural habits were based on an acute knowledge of their world. The peasants have continually been chided for resisting agricultural development whether in the form of tools, methods, or accepting new foodstuffs (like the potato) to grow. This decision, when better examined according to Moon, appears to have less to do with ignorant stubbornness and was actually based on what was reliable in Russia. The peasants simply could not afford to plant any untested crop or use new equipment for if it failed, it would force them to default on their obligations and more importantly cause famine. The old system, although archaic in other parts of the globe, was reliable in the eyes of the peasants.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A quote from a peasant woman in the reign of Alexander II illustrates how the peasants were heavily taxed “O, wretched is our life, little our land, great are our taxes, and we do not know what to do”. The raised taxation made many peasants destitute, along with the poll tax which, according to Kotsonis, “remained the largest single direct tax, and by now it fell exclusively on peasants”. Alexander efficaciously made the peasants situation worse than when they were under serfdom. Leontovitsch deeply supports this suggesting that peasants had financial burdens after the emancipation as “Immediately after the emancipation, taxes and redemption payments were higher than the income that could be derived from the allotment land”. This can be viewed as superficial, Alexander II sought change, in his coronation Manifesto he planned reform, Karesh and Hurvitz state “Many poor people in Russia benefited: back taxes were cancelled, tax exemptions granted, better distribution of poll tax announced”.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsarist Russia Essay

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stolypin’s land reforms mainly constituted allowing peasants to own, sell and trade land. Before long, an ‘upper class’ of peasants emerged - the Kulaks. The Kulaks were pleased with the new policy as it benefited them, and many reinstated their support for Tsar Nicholas II. The newly industrialised Russia also brought about more labour opportunities for Russia, appeasing the formerly oppressed peasants.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How far was Rasputin responsible for the collapse of the Tsarist regime? The Tsarist regime collapsed in March 1917 when Nicholas II abdicated. By the time of the abdication the Tsarist regime had already been damaged by a number of factors that could be held responsible for the overall downfall of Tsar Nicholas II. One of these factors is the influence that Rasputin, a monk who convinced the Tsarina that he could cure her son of his haemophilia.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent was military defeat a cause for the Russian revolution? The First World War was truly massive war. It had rather complex origins, it was vast in terms of scale, its human and material costs were enormous, and its results were profound. The First World War resulted in the end of four empires; the German, the Russian, the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman empires all ceased to exist by the end of the First World, either as a result of the economic demands of war - like Russia, which had a revolution half way through the war - or as a result of losing.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent was Tsar Nicholas Responsible for the fall of the Romanov dynasty Tsar Nicholas was responsible for the fall of the Romanov dynasty and accelerating the russian revolution. Tsar Nicholas was a major cause of the downfall but his wife tsarina and Rasputin also contributed. The tsar left to the war which was already creating uproar in russia as it was weakening the economy, creating worldwide hunger and unhappiness throughout. Unhappiness lead to demonstrations that developed into political action against the tsar. Furthermore the tsar;s leadership and understanding of reality was abysmal during the war.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Workers and city-dwellers, who depended most on the relatively complex ties of urban and industrial society, were reduced to isolation, poverty, and improtence, breaking up furniture for fuel they could no longer buy on the market, and bartering cherished family possessions in nearby villages in order to scrape together enough grain, potatoes, and milk to survive”(Geoffrey K. Hosking, 409). Because the separation of the two political groups that had been caused by the revolution, people had to live in a society that is lawless and unstable. People still had a harsh and poor life after the revolution because the end of the Russian Revolution did not stop the issue of human liberty. In conclusion, the Russian Revolution was filled with the voice from the encounters of workers. There was endless suffering among the Russian people during the revolution.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was in this climate that the revolution broke out in the Russian capital and then spread throughout the country. Kerensky 's government lasted a few months , then became unpopular because of having tried to continue the war against the Germans and because they had made no economic reform favorable to the…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays