The origin of the family, Private Property and the State
In the 1884, Frederick Engels write The origin of the Family, Private Property and the State base on Marx 's note. This book illustrate how the change of the “family” meaning, in which the women position in the society transform. He emphasis when a man “take” a woman, and then, he live in the woman clan, it does not a sign of women subordination. Yet the economic power of women. In community, the pairing is not only a matrilinear but matriarchal, in which women have an economic, social and political power. The focus here is the women 's status is gained from a household, in the center of primitive production (Tong, 1998). In the savage and barbarian women position is not only free but honorable. The social force have a role to form a pairing family, which is establish between savagery and barbarism. At that time, the domestication of animal and the breeding of herds had increased the wealthiness of human, and formed new social …show more content…
In considering the degree of the importance of men 's work and production, the value of women 's work and production is decline and decrease the women 's status among society. In the new form of family, the man as a husband has a power base on their economic domination (Tong, 1998). Literally, family is come from Roman “familia” which did not refer to the married couple with their children. This word was referred to the slaves. Famulus is domestic slave, and familia is a number of slaves that is belonged to men. In the time of Gaius, the family patrimony was inherited by will. This Roman term represented “a new social organization whose head ruled over wife and children, and a number of slave, and was invested under Roman paternal power with rights of life and death over them all” (Mann & Patterson, 2016: pp.154; Engels,
In the 1884, Frederick Engels write The origin of the Family, Private Property and the State base on Marx 's note. This book illustrate how the change of the “family” meaning, in which the women position in the society transform. He emphasis when a man “take” a woman, and then, he live in the woman clan, it does not a sign of women subordination. Yet the economic power of women. In community, the pairing is not only a matrilinear but matriarchal, in which women have an economic, social and political power. The focus here is the women 's status is gained from a household, in the center of primitive production (Tong, 1998). In the savage and barbarian women position is not only free but honorable. The social force have a role to form a pairing family, which is establish between savagery and barbarism. At that time, the domestication of animal and the breeding of herds had increased the wealthiness of human, and formed new social …show more content…
In considering the degree of the importance of men 's work and production, the value of women 's work and production is decline and decrease the women 's status among society. In the new form of family, the man as a husband has a power base on their economic domination (Tong, 1998). Literally, family is come from Roman “familia” which did not refer to the married couple with their children. This word was referred to the slaves. Famulus is domestic slave, and familia is a number of slaves that is belonged to men. In the time of Gaius, the family patrimony was inherited by will. This Roman term represented “a new social organization whose head ruled over wife and children, and a number of slave, and was invested under Roman paternal power with rights of life and death over them all” (Mann & Patterson, 2016: pp.154; Engels,