Capital Punishment Outdated

Superior Essays
Capital punishment is an outdated method to deal with prisoners that have committed dreadful felonies. Currently 32 states have the death penalty in the United States. The U.S. is the only country on the western hemisphere with this punishment while countries in the middle east still have it. Since 1970, 1,400 felonies have been executed and 28 death penalties this past year. In due time the death penalty will be removed and with America’s luck that’s going to be the same era, where crime levels around the nation increase. Without capital punishment criminals will not have the fear of being sent to death before committing a crime.
Keywords: [Click here to add keywords.]
Death Penalty
In 1976, the death sentence was reestablished and the first
…show more content…
I can’t say I approve of ending a human’s life if we aren’t 100% sure he or she committed the crime. There is no possibility coming back from death so it’s essential to have all the facts before injecting a possible innocent civilian. In 1984 Kirk Bloodsworth was sent to death for the rape and murder of a young girl in Maryland. The factor that incriminated him was an eye witness report. He was thankfully found innocent due to DNA testing. It’s crazy to know that 10 people were found innocent in 2003 for wrongful evidence. Imagine how many poor souls that were wrongfully executed in the far …show more content…
An eye for an eye, it’s a punishment sentenced upon the offender equivalent to the suffer of the victim. The death penalty should be a less extreme vision of that phrase. Depending on the severity of your crime or the number killed in the act is over 3 than the criminal should be executed as long as the defendant is 100% guilty. With more guilty prisoners being executed, jails and prisons will have a lower inmate population. Having the fear of being found and executed for taking loves of others will make people think twice before ending a life.
[Heading 4]. Capital punishment is an old style of executing criminals. Most people would say it’s immoral to take one’s life, with others saying two wrongs don’t make a right. But imagine if there was a group of victims and one of the victims was your parent or sibling. With having captured the culprit of that crime he or she isn’t a human anymore. Killing more than 3 people doesn’t allow you to be a human anymore. As a demonstration of equal exchange the felon should pay with their lives. An eye for an eye as equal exchange. (Last Name,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, in a civic view, it does not rely on anybody the right to take other people’s lives. Several countries and states throughout the United Sates, which have abolished capital punishment, noticed a subsequent decrease on what is called murder. In other words, the intention of capital punishment is to lower the murder rates, however, what it truly does is increasing it, leading capital punishment laws to a failure law enforcement. For example, in 1976, before capital punishment was abolished, three homicides were committed per 100,000 people in Canada. After the death penalty was abolished, 1.85 murders per 100,000 people in 2003.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since earlier times, deviance has been prominent in society. Overtime offenses have gradually been taken more seriously due to a better understanding on the reasoning of crime. Although criminologists theorize the origin of crime, it is still a blurry line on whether the perpetrator should physically be held accountable for his or her life. This ideology can date back to the Code of Hammurabi, where corporate punishment was a form of discipline. Corporate punishment consisted of inflicting any physical pain onto the perpetrator that was measured to the offense.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Nathanson, who wrote “An eye for an eye?” suggests the factual and moral beliefs about the death penalty are wrong and need to be strictly abolished. The passage states, “ A person’s actions, it seems, provide not only a basis for a moral appraisal of the person but also a guide to how he should be treated”. Also stated, “ What people deserve as recipients of rewards or punishments is determined by what they do as agents”. The argument claiming people should get a punishment based on what they do is accurate. What is not accurate however, is suggesting if someone murders another person, they should receive capital punishment.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty today is perceived by many as an inhumane way of receiving punishment. A critic will not only argue the simple fact that the death penalty is a violation of one’s constitutional rights and only targeted for a particular social group, but also intended to affect innocent people. The death penalty doesn’t have to be the way it’s perceived to be today, for if it is dealt with accordingly, the benefits will outweigh the negative and would help the United States in the foreseeing future. That being said, instead of worrying about the damage the death penalty may cause, one should take into consideration the reasoning behind maintaining and implementing new procedures that would further enforce the penalty nationwide. Convicts…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The way we view ourselves as human beings relies on our morality and compassion towards others. Our ability to forgive those who have done us wrong and seek proper justice has become a standard. Capital punishment manages to defy all these standards. Wasting government funding on executing already captured criminals wastes millions of taxpayers dollars every year. Reverting back to the usage of the death penalty makes us no better than our ancestors and prove that we have learned nothing over this long and violent period of time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is too much wrong doing going on and it affects society greatly. The racial discrimination that goes on I our court rooms when comes to the death penalty should be addressed as there are too many whites getting lesser penalty’s than the ones they deserve. And the society should really think about if capital punishment is acting as deterrence to crimes or is capital punishment just another way to kill people. As this essay has shown that capital punishment if not as effective as society needs it to be because there is more and more homicides every day. In my eyes I believe capital punishment should be abolished across the country and instead of using billions of dollars to execute prisoners the government should build more prisons so that these inmates can spend the rest of their lives in a…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outcry Against Injustice The world is a mess of brokenness, evil and injustice, but it would never understand what true evil is if it did not see its own failure at perfection. The injustices that follow may be overlooked many times for things that are perhaps more important, but if people tried to fix what they could, then the world will, in small steps, become a better place. People make this world what it is without realizing that they will be the ones who have to live in it. Live for what is right and maybe the world will follow.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Nathanson’s argument in “An Eye for an Eye?” stresses the need to do away with the ultimate form of punishment; the death penalty. Nathanson compares the ancient principle of equal retaliation to the current idea of capital punishment. He provides moral arguments for preserving the sanctity of human life as he points out the flaws with murdering killers. The views of other scholars of philosophy are cited by Nathanson and then analyzed for their invalid points. Nathanson first describes the problems with the lex talionis principle, or the idea of “an eye for an eye”.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Stephen Nathanson’s book, An Eye for an Eye, he argues against capital punishment by discussing the problems of the most common argument for the death penalty: the Equal Punishment Principle. He also discusses the problems with sub-category theories of the Equal Punishment Principle: quality/proportional retributivism, and ends by offering the reader what abolishing the death penalty would grant to society. Nathanson believes the Equal Punishment Principle if fallible, because it is difficult and implausible to be able to use “eye for an eye” for every act of crime. For example, thieves would receive theft, embezzlers would be embezzled, spies would be spied on etc. All of those actions would be an eye for an eye, but would not necessarily…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is described as a government sanctioned punishment where a person that has committed a crime is put to death by the state. This sentence is commonly used toward people who have committed awfully high offenses such as murder, war crimes, and crimes against humanity and genocides. It dates back to the 1500's where this was seen as the just way of law that made criminals pay for their crimes in front of an entire community. Back then they used methods of hanging, stoning, and lashing these people, their main purpose being one, to maximize the general balance of pain and pleasure towards society. There are certain actions that we can take into our hands and those in which the law plays an important role.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eye for an Eye, Right or Wrong Over the centuries, we all have heard the phrase “eye for eye, tooth for tooth.” (The Holy Bible, Exodus 21:24)1. There have been thousands of discussions about this topic; is it right, is it wrong, or is it only on occasions. Most say the penalty of “eye for an eye”, or the law of restitution should be abolished others say it is a necessity of our federal punishment system. The necessity of this kind of punishment is not as needed as it was when it was first established around the 6th century BCE (Hammurabi's Code: An Eye for an Eye, ushitory.org)2.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lethal Injection History

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In today’s times, murderer’s actions are becoming more and more incohesive. They no longer commit just murder, but also crimes like theft, rape, or even torture. Things like this will continue to happen if nothing is done to stop them or deter them The death penalty is a humane way to punish the convicted and to alter the minds of people that would want to do the same. As early as the 1800s was the first actual recordings of the criminal justice system doing its job with capital punishment. Just between 1930 and 1967 there was an astounding number of 3800 executions.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life. This is the age old doctrine of lex talionis, which appears in the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi that has been used as a code of retaliation for thousands of years. Ancient Babylon used lex talionis as a rule used to decide the severity of punishments for the type of crime committed. If a life was taken, then the murderer was put to death: a life for a life (Hood 1). Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the practice of executing criminals who have been convicted of a serious crime and, consequently, have been handed a death sentence.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Capital punishment reinforces the ‘eye for an eye’ mentality, though some would suggest that in order for civilization to advance that mentality needs to be changed. It can also be about setting the right example for society and showing them that revenge only ever makes matters worse, and that it is hypocritical for the state to kill somebody because they killed somebody…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics