In Emerson’s essay about self-reliance he passionately urges man to turn away from the thoughts of society. Emerging from a puritan society that fully and willingly enabled the church institution to think for its members, Emerson bluntly resisted this practice. Most preachers today might believe Emerson to be anti-Christian. However, Emerson and Thoreau shed light on valuable points of reasoning. Reasoning that I neither agree nor disagree with and believe that self-reliance can be both positive and negative depending on the use of it. The central idea of self-reliance itself could be quite powerful if used for the right reasons. A few examples of how self-reliance could have been used to create a positive change could have been the Salem Witch Trials and the Nazi genocide upon the Jews. Through out history and as in these examples, we see man himself following heinous and despicable orders in order to conform to the institution. Would these tragic cases in history be much different had the idea of self-reliance taken place? How many lives would have been spared had the thousands of Germans looked inside themselves for the answers and not to Hitler and the Government for orders? The answer to this question is yes. Having myself been raised in a religious institution that controlled my every move, I fully and proudly chose to not conform. Looking inside myself I chose self-reliance to decide for the future what was right. We cannot totally deny or refuse to respect the idea of institution but we must listen to our own instincts. We must use the idea of self-reliance to decide the difference between right and wrong. Emerson was profoundly right to encourage man to look inside himself for the answers to right and wrong. Most transcendentalists supported anti-slavery movements and woman rights. When we evaluate the reasons for this support we can come to
In Emerson’s essay about self-reliance he passionately urges man to turn away from the thoughts of society. Emerging from a puritan society that fully and willingly enabled the church institution to think for its members, Emerson bluntly resisted this practice. Most preachers today might believe Emerson to be anti-Christian. However, Emerson and Thoreau shed light on valuable points of reasoning. Reasoning that I neither agree nor disagree with and believe that self-reliance can be both positive and negative depending on the use of it. The central idea of self-reliance itself could be quite powerful if used for the right reasons. A few examples of how self-reliance could have been used to create a positive change could have been the Salem Witch Trials and the Nazi genocide upon the Jews. Through out history and as in these examples, we see man himself following heinous and despicable orders in order to conform to the institution. Would these tragic cases in history be much different had the idea of self-reliance taken place? How many lives would have been spared had the thousands of Germans looked inside themselves for the answers and not to Hitler and the Government for orders? The answer to this question is yes. Having myself been raised in a religious institution that controlled my every move, I fully and proudly chose to not conform. Looking inside myself I chose self-reliance to decide for the future what was right. We cannot totally deny or refuse to respect the idea of institution but we must listen to our own instincts. We must use the idea of self-reliance to decide the difference between right and wrong. Emerson was profoundly right to encourage man to look inside himself for the answers to right and wrong. Most transcendentalists supported anti-slavery movements and woman rights. When we evaluate the reasons for this support we can come to