Montesquieu And Despotism

Improved Essays
Baron de la Brede et de Montesquieu (1689-1775)
Montesquieu disagreed with both Hobbes and Locke because Hobbes and Locke both describe a “presocial” nature and this to Montesquieu was futile (p.15), and in order to understand society we must understand it through observation. Montesquieu discussed three types of government; Republic, Monarchy and Despotism (p.15). “In a Republic, individuals are citizens and are therefore equal. In a Monarchy, the principle of honour produces hierarchies of rank and status among the subjects. A despotism promotes equality among the subjects, but it is an equality of fear and impotence” (15). Montesquieu claimed that all of his ideas were based on facts rather than personal prejudice but he did not always
…show more content…
While he agreed with Hobbes’s idea that society was an artificial construct, but along with Montesquieu criticized Hobbes’s view of human beings as independent individuals in society. He also agreed with Locke’s idea that society was formed as a result of contract among individuals (p.17). “Rousseau’s ideas were more radical. He believed that man’s original nature was corrupted by society, and that the only way man could become a virtuous, moral being was to totally transform society” (p.17). His main focus was on the possibility of drastic social change. He argued against Hobbes that state of war among individuals was a social phenomenon rather than an innate quality of human beings. Rousseau believed all problems started with the ownership of property and the claiming of private property is what brought about war, conflict and thus the need for a civil state. “Rousseau’s perception for the rejuvenation of the individual and society was not a return to the original state of nature” (p.17). He believed that the repairing of a society would only be possible if all members of that society shared the construction of laws for their common happiness equally; therefore the sovereign authority would reside in the General Will. This in turn meant all members surrendering their individual rights to the community in return for civil liberty and protection of property. “Giving himself to all, gives himself to nobody”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He wanted a leader, however, unlike Hobbes, people could revolt against this power if needed. He believed that adult males that owned property could vote, but the mass majority of people; such as women and the mass majority of men did not own homes, could not vote. Montesquieu believed…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rousseau offers an unrealistic and damaging account of human nature” critically respond to this statement with reference to either Hobbes or Machiavelli. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a political philosopher who has made a great impact on the area of politics. Even though his perspectives are utopian and are different to both Hobbes and Machiavelli. His contribution has made a significant impact in the way that politics is conceived. Therefore, it is the contention of this essay by using Machiavelli’s ideology to expose that Rousseau's ideas about human nature are utopian and in a sense damaging for the society.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The description of the state of nature is only a prelude to political theories concerning the ideal political system for humans to live in. On one hand, Rousseau depicted natural man as solitary and peaceful as he illustrated how man is tainted as he becomes societal via the process of moving into society. To him, society is the corrupting force that transforms ‘natural man’ into the self-obsessed beast that Hobbes declares he is. He does not deny Hobbes’ concept of state of nature but declares it incorrect and gives it his own significant meaning. For Rousseau, reverting back to the state of nature is much more than the removal of government or authority.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to have a peaceful, and prosperous society or community, the laws of that society should be based on the interests and will of the majority of the citizens. His idea of general will is very similar to the ideology of democracy, where every individual interests are considered and the interests of majority rules. However I also believe that the idea of general will, would not be established in today’s world because each individual in each country around the world has different interests and it will very difficult nowadays to live within a society which shares a general will because in Rousseau’s general will, all the power, rights and interests of each individual are controlled and directed by community…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    JOHN LOCKE 1. What does Locke mean when he refers to the laws of nature? Describe what rights and liberties man would have living in a state of nature. Be sure to include specific examples from the reading. (2 pts.)…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did you know that without the Enlightenment the US and even The World wouldn’t be like how it is today? The Enlightenment was a new period of thinking among many educated Europeans that began during the late 1600s. Some of the really great people that influenced the US include Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Abigail Adams. Montesquieu focused on the separation of powers that we see here in the US today. Voltaire contributed to Religious Tolerance and Freedom of speech, which are two things we the in the US.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau both agree how significantly society changed from the state of nature, and that implication that change had on the governments that followed. These arguments are important to note for the later implication on the purpose of the state, and how that purpose…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote The Social Contract post-French Revolution because he wanted to create a system of government he thought to be legitimate. Rousseau explains throughout The Social Contract that for a government to be legitimate, the power must lie in the hands of the general will, which represents the whole body politic. Rousseau’s idea sounds great, that is until it is put into practice and, alongside the strengths, you can also see the weakness of it. His philosophy of governance is not one that I can fully support. I cannot support his idea of a legitimate government because I do not think the people can properly govern themselves.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorinda Outram’s book The Enlightenment contains the chapter “Enlightenment and Government” which highlights that contrary to popular belief, not all philosophes had the same ideas when it came to the ideal government. Outram focuses on the misconceptions people had about the Enlightenment and bring to light the true differences people had about government during this time period. Outram discusses the relationship between the Enlightenment and government, a relationship that has had few research. Through the lives of three leaders in Enlightenment and government John Lock, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it is clear how philosophes greatly differed yet had many similarities in the way they viewed government. John Locke’s view of government is based on the idea that all men are in a state of nature by God; Locke refers to this state as perfect freedom in Second Treatise on Government.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs. Rousseau

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and explaining the way that Hobbes and Rousseau’s ideas regarding the national condition of human beings differ. In my exegesis, I will be discussing how in Leviathan (ch. 13), Hobbes takes a stance regarding egoism, the idea that man always acts in their own interest. I will also be discussing the fact that Rousseau is fundamentally opposed to the ideas in which Hobbes presents. Rousseau believes that society taints the fundamental core beliefs of mankind. I will then present the critical point of this paper: the fact that the two philosophers have very conflicting viewpoints on the concept of human nature.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While things in political regimes continue to change, they still remain monotonous because the constitutional dogma doesn’t change. Primary laws such as the Constitution remain stagnant, but secondary laws are constantly changing. People make the mistake that when they see secondary laws they think it can lead to revolution, but Tocqueville says the principle of the republic is solid and impossible to replace. Although a democratic society is always changing, that does not mean it is in the grip of an endless revolution. Modern revolutions, he believed, are the byproduct of the drive for equality.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his treatise The Spirit of the Laws, Montesquieu critiques the enlightened idea that every individual is reasonable and “educable.” Montesquieu states in the first book of his treatise that, “Before there were intelligent beings, they were possible; they had therefore possible relations, and consequently possible laws.” While Montesquieu is not contesting the idea that individuals are reasonable, he is stating that individuals are reasonable according to the physical nature that surrounds them. So, as Russia expanded so did the amount of different ethnic groups. Catherine, under the gaze of Montesquieu 's critiques, began to promote institutions that favored the ethnic diversity of Russia.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau observes human nature as innately good when it’s extracted from all social attachments and the immensely corrupting overall influence of society itself. Society, for Rousseau in his eyes is a grand impulse where the decencies of human beings are displayed. Rousseau 's political theories are derived from the seemingly simple idea of arranging humans into a social setting that’s bare of corrupting elements of society. Rousseau 's leap toward a social and political order of amour propre over amour de soi is evidence of this. Rousseau derives a substantial amount of his beliefs from morals such as equality.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The people understood that they are the power and centerpiece holding everything together. He also truly enjoyed how the people would come together as a whole to discuss the issues face to face that were happening on all levels from the government to the people. Hobbes was quite the opposite of this however which led Rousseau to maintain such a firm stance with him as well as Grotius. Rousseau’s legacy is based mainly on two concepts found in his work with the idea of the Social Contract Theory. However, the purpose of Rousseau 's philosophy and his approved government is essentially the idea that if all problems are met with the unity of the people and dealt with accordingly using his Social Contract Theory.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays