Evidence In Kathryn Schulz's Evidence

Improved Essays
The act of actively combating our inductive bias in Kathryn Schulz’s Evidence in Kathryn Schulz’s essay, “Evidence”, the argument of the essay follows various situations brought up by Schulz, showing that people should take a positive approach to being wrong, and accept our error-prone nature, rather than obsessing with a perfect inadvertently-free ideal. Schulz ties together a lot of strong evidence, but fades back from a clear conclusion, steering the readers toward a relationship between error and the self. She further studies moral transformation on conversations, our attachment to a view wrongly identified due to our pre-conceived opinion off prior experience. Schulz stresses that in order for us to improve our relationship with to evidence, …show more content…
While I was reading Schulz’s essay, what came up to mind was about a scenario I had in one of my classes for my major. In class, my professor told us to get into groups and talk about what answers we got from an in-class assignment assigned earlier. When we assembled into our groups, I was going over answers that I had on my paper and briefly explained on how I got that answer with so much confidence. As I was doing this, my group members looked at each other kind of strangely and scratching their heads as they told me that most of my responses were very different from what they had. When they told me their logics and reasoning, I soon realized that my answers were completely off guard. In that moment, I felt as if I was running on a cliff to only find out that I was standing in mid-air and just plummeted down to the ground. I was just so confident in my results that I didn’t even notice what outcome was going to be. Luckily for me, my groupmates all understood where I was coming from because they all have been there and experienced my situation and learned from it. That’s when I realized that it’s okay to be wrong and not be scared because it’ll actually help you gain more knowledge than anything else you could’ve ever …show more content…
At a moment when economic, political, and religious dogmatism increasingly divide us, Schulz explores the seduction of certainty and the crisis occasioned by error with uncommon humor and eloquence. Kathryn Schulz really does go the extra mile when telling us that being wrong is okay. There’s nothing wrong with it, it’s just human nature. We’re never going to be perfect so we need to get rid of the stigma of always wanting to be a natural. Everybody messes up here and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Mollie Steimer was born in Tsarist Russia and traveled to New York City during 1912 when she was fifteen years old. Steimer joined the Frayhayt and the anarchist movement. As a result, she became an anarchist/activist who desired labor force rights, free speech, and was an anti-war activist. During this trial testimony of 1918, she speaks and gives her explanation of anarchism.…

    • 62 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I was then given consent by Barbara Mcneill to go through her phone. The timeline Barbara Mcneill gave me matched the phone call and text messages that were in her phone. After the interview I transported Barbara Mcneill to her father’s residence at 1914 Ramsey St. While at the residence I spoke to Brittany Mcneill the daughter of Barbara Mcneill. Brittany Mcneill stated she and Stacy Ray got into a verbal altercation because he was intoxicated. Brittany Mcneill stated the only time she would argue with Stacy Ray is when he got intoxicated.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America’s Addiction to Belief The article “Americas Addiction to Belief” is written by an award-winning novelist, journalist, and producer Brian Trent. Brian Trent is a writer of fiction and nonfiction stories which were published in the different magazines such as the Humanist, Boston Literary Magazine and others. The main idea of “America’s Addiction to Belief’ is that nowadays population of America is blindly evolved into “culture of the blogosphere and mass media.” He states in his article “It is a culture that thrives on the false principle that “all opinions are equal,” even those without a shred of factual data, documentation, or reasoned methodology.”…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evidences a struggle between Ideals and Reality that results in…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Corn-Pone Opinions,” “The Creation Myths of Cooperstown,” and “Graven Images,” by Twain, Gould, and Bellow, respectively, each author explores the fallibility of human perception. While the main purposes of these three essays differ, each one still implements the theme of trending to illustrate how and why people naturally conform-- even if a movement involves believing in a falsehood. In the first essay, “Corn-Pone Opinions,” Twain analyzes how most people shape their beliefs based on what is popular. Twain specifically makes three points to explain why people merely follow the masses to formulate their point of view, with the first one being that trends always start with an individual with power.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    SARTRE PRESENTATIONS/SEMINARS Summary of Comments/Score. Overall, my group’s presentation was clear and we were able to convey our section to the class well without too much assistance from you. However, our written outline had a few issues. First, the outlines organization was a little cluttered and could have been cleaned up to be easier to follow. Additionally, we struggled with the rhetorical function section of the outline.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Varicella Vaccination Program Success” by Steven Novella, the author argues about the people who does not believe in vaccines and how are their arguments formulated. They ignore all the information and statitistics and focus on the smaller problems caused in the investigation, to assure that vaccines are not effective and riskful. However, besides all this, the author states at the end that we should follow more closely the vaccines programs and know that they are useful with the proper regulations. Moreover, Novella starts the article talking about the cognitive dissonance, which is “the state of mind that results when conflict arises between perceived reality and the cherished or learned facts, values, and beliefs regarding that reality.”,…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth Kolbert's article, “Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds,” in the New Yorkers February 2017 issue looks at some main ideas in three different psychological books about patterns in human reasoning and attempts to connect them to today’s politics. Her explanation of the studies and their outcomes were superb, though she could have done a better job at connecting these points to her political conclusion. It is difficult to distinguish what her main point is. She starts the article by describing a couple experiments done at Stanford on human reasoning.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Peter Elbows Essay “The Believing Game” He discusses the vital information of the “Believing Game” and The Doubting Game to an instinct to which the audience understands to be important to our intellectual growth and differentiation of opinions/positions of ourselves and peers. In the beginning of Peter's essay, he discusses the way people deliberate in their minds over how people see things differently than others. He uses the example of inkblots to show that some people aren't willing to see things in a different perspective unless someone else is willing to see things in their perspective. Also the discussion of people wanting others to see their point of view, but wanting the others to give up their position and opinions about the topic or idea to…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elbow's Argument Analysis

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the traditional method of critical thinking, the goal is to find the right answer by discovering and ferreting out the wrong answers. Thus, in a multiple choice quiz, a student could determine that the correct answer was C by knowing that A, B, and D were incorrect. This student knows that, as Sherlock Holmes said, “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” To me, this quote sums up the premise of what Elbow refers to as the doubting game. Once all untrue assertions have been eliminated, what remains is presumed true.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Octavia Butler’s The Parable of the Sower the reader sees a society whose commons has been destroyed by large-scale forces such as an alternative-right wing President controlling an inadequate, neoliberal economy, a capitalist civilization which fails to maximize the ‘good’ of all citizens, and a national ideology that is built upon a rigid, outdated set of values. The large-scale failure of the commons coincides with the theory proposed by Hardin about what makes an unsuccessful or successful commons. Butler takes their theory a step further in her novel by showing how these large-scale elements lead to small-scale community effects such as isolation and willful ignorance. This successive fragmentation of society and its impact on individual communities and citizens presented by Butler can be analyzed through Garret Hardin’s political theory on the tragedy of the commons. Butler introduces her readers into a society that suffers from large-scale flaws resulting in a failed commons.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Serial’s Season 1 Episode 9: “To Be Suspected” posted in the fall of 2014, journalist Sarah Koenig provides significant new evidence for the murder of Hae Min Lee. Koenig is beginning to argue that the 2:36 p.m. call from Adnan Syed to Jay saying that Hae was dead is nearly impossible. She has multiple other people that went to Woodlawn High School to support her argument by stating that they recall speaking with Hae right after school or spotted her around 3 p.m. at school. Koenig speculates that if these accusations were true, then Jays testimony would no longer be trustworthy and his statements about the time and places would not be credible. Throughout episode 9, Koenig introduces her audience to the life Adnan has built in prison along…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many types of argument exist; however, all of them classify as one of the following a forensic argument, a ceremonial argument, or a deliberative argument. A forensic argument tends to be about past events just like in the article published in The New York Times, “Rail Industry Had Safety Technology Decades Ago.” Ron Nixon, a New York Times writer, has earned an credible reputation by publishing many articles in the well known established newspaper. A ceremonial argument comes up in the article “Beijing’s Fear of Technology” where the author, James Zimmerman focused in a present issue. Zimmerman has also earned his credibility by constantly writing and publishing article revolving around China, leading his audience to observe he keeps up to date about Beijing’s latest problems arising.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Conformism In Gryphon

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How do you know the color of the shirt you are wearing? Can you be sure that blue is really blue? Our knowledge comes from many years of schooling and facts taught to us by our parents, teachers, and what we saw in books and media. We regurgitate these facts in our daily lives. When something different comes along, we may get uncomfortable and resist it.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reflection On IAT Scores

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When I first learned that I would have to complete multiple IAT tests, I automatically had an idea of what I thought my scores were going to be for each test. For all of the tests, I assumed that I would receive a score of moderate preference. I especially assumed that I would receive a score of moderate preference on the Race IAT test because that was the score that I had received when I took the same test last year. Turns out, I received a moderate preference score on the Gender- Career and Age IAT tests, and a strong preference score on the Race, and Disability IAT tests. I think when I first found out that I had received a score of strong preference on the Race and Disability IAT tests I was at first very shocked and confused about…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays