Descartes Meditation Analysis

Superior Essays
At the core of Descartes’ Meditations is the question about truth in our world, specifically what can we definitively know/perceive to be true and how do we arrive at this conclusion. When he reaches the end of his second meditation Descartes establishes that while there is uncertainty in the way we perceive things because of our senses, the intellect can still understand the most fundamental aspects of that thing to affirm its existence. Most importantly, he concludes that his own mind is the object that can be perceived most clearly, which lays the foundation for his later arguments about the nature of God’s existence.
Leading into this conclusion Descartes has trouble finding any validation in anything being true. He claims that mostly everything
…show more content…
While our vision would tell us that the final form ought to be a different object than the initial form based on the changed physical properties, we still define it as wax. How can we be so certain that the two are the same, unable to convince ourselves that one is different from the other? It is at this point that Descartes starts to formulate the idea that an entity has properties that are perceived by the intellect uninfluenced by the senses. Rather, the senses are there to provide a more vivid interpretation of that object, so even if they are imperfect in interpreting the properties of that object we can still know what that object is. From this point Descartes is able to claim that our own minds are most clearly and distinctly known because it is what judges and interprets the objects we see, so by judging that what we see exists, we are affirming that we exist; for whether our interpretations are true or contain error, our minds are working to arrive at these conclusions. If this applies for the wax, then it will apply for anything else we perceive (Meditation II, p.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His initial premise, doubting reality, follows the process of thinking regarding the mind's perception of its environment. The body and mind are separate in Descartes' understanding. Though they work in tandem, human experience is dependent on the mind. The body is merely a vessel for the mind, and its senses cannot be trusted to determine reality. The mind, then, is what must be examined to determine the scope of reality.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Discussion and the Conclusion: In Meditation II, Descartes introduces the “Wax Analogy” in order to demonstrate conclusively that things are known through the intellect rather than the senses and that the mind is better known than the body. Specifically, the argument is concerned with how we know rather than what we know. The argument concentrates on transformation— that is, a piece of wax melting into liquid wax. Descartes states that our senses allow us to know about a piece of wax: its colour, taste, smell, size, shape, and solidity. When the wax is placed near a fire, it melts; thus, its properties change as well.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes argues that there are varying degrees of reality. At the bottom, there are Modes that depend on finale substances for their existence (the color of a chair or a shape). Above the modes are Finate Substances, including us, trees, and tables. At the top are Infinite Substances or God. Each type must come from somewhere as you cant get something out of nothing.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will then proceed to analyze the third meditation in which Descartes focuses on a causal argument for existence of God who is perfect. By the end of the third meditation, Descartes appears to prove that he is not God and that God exists. Descartes knows that he exists by the very fact of “cogito”. He cannot doubt that he exists because something cannot doubt or have awareness and not exist.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The focus of this paper is the Cartesian Circle. There seems to be a circularity in Descartes’ argument regarding the claims of the existence of God. There are philosophers who claim Descartes commits to a belief that has no foundation and because his argument is circular it holds no weight. There are also philosophers who defend Descartes and claim that he does not commit himself to a foundationless belief and that what seems circular isn’t actually circular. I will be supporting the latter argument and I will show that Descartes doesn’t consign to a circular argument but rather gives an argument that both supports his claim about God and shows how his base belief is a solid foundation for other beliefs to be built upon.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the world you lived in wasn’t real, how would you know? In this paper, I will be discussing Descartes’s line of reasoning while attempt to prove the uncertainty of many ordinary beliefs using his universal or Cartesian doubt, in Descartes’s book Meditations on First Philosophy. Dubbed the “Father of Modern Philosophy”, Descartes was a philosopher in Sweden who taught others philosophy, and was also a huge advocate for mathematics, specifically geometry. He doubts everything that his senses inform his of, and even the reasoning procedure, because he wants to conquer skepticism. He knows, however, that he is real because he has the ability to think.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says in the first meditation he is doubtful about all the things he thinks he knows, and in the second meditation he states that he believes he exists when he thinks he exists. Descartes concluded that whatever he truly believes in clearly and distinctly therefore then must be…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his first meditation, Descartes decides to get rid of any false beliefs. All of his past beliefs were built on his senses, which have deceived him in the past. Despite this deception, Descartes expresses how there could be things learned through his senses that he cannot doubt, such as himself. He recalls how even his dreams have deceived him before, making him believe that he is sitting near a fire, when in reality he is asleep in bed.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Something which can be difficult to distinguish when reading the Meditations is whether Descartes is talking about truth in its purest sense or reality. In the second meditation, he argues that when looking to establish truth we need to accept that we exist otherwise we cannot judge the truth in anything else. But this can be confusing as he is relating truth and reality and equalling them to each other. If Descartes here, is referring to the idea of reality he is arguing that for us to judge the reality of anything else, we must admit that through our ability to think for ourselves and rationalise, we must be real. However, if he is referring to truth, then he is using the truth of our own thoughts to rationalise the truth of all else.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We would not know whether there is a soul in the body or not. However, Descartes, through the second meditation, has demonstrated that the wax is recognized not through the senses or imagination but the mind alone. And in meditation four he uses god as a foundation to prove that material objects exists. Saying that God is no deceiver and therefore objects that God create - the world, would never deceive.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays