Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory Essay

Improved Essays
Emmanuel Kant (1724-1804) a German philosopher and thinker, born in Prussia. He is one of the brightest philosophers in the Age of Enlightenment. Kant stated the supreme principle of morality is not based on religious revelation but based on reason. In Kant's theory, there are some particular parts that important to consider in relation to leadership "first, his theory emphasizes the fact that no one is an exception to moral laws. Second, his theory makes us think about situations in which leaders must act on strongly held beliefs or duty duties that are not their own interest. Third, he says that we should never use people. And finally, he says that everyone, no matter who they are, should be both the legislator and the follower of moral laws in what Kant calls "this kingdom of ends." (p.95). However, in Kant’s theory, we can see the argument among duty and self-interest.
The philosopher Immanuel Kant believes that people should be treated as ends in themselves and not treated as means. The reason is that people have value in life and should be respected. He believes that human will always be valued depend on the fact that they are human not because of any other reason.
…show more content…
Hypothetical imperatives are doing an action in order to reach our goals. Those kinds of actions are motivated by our desires so we can reach our ends. People did those kinds of actions frequently which is the act of reason. For example, studying will get us a degree. The moral rules are universal laws. For that, our actions goals should be toward making them not universal. There are many examples of leaders that treating their employee in the workplaces as means. For example, when a leader gives extra work to his employee it is not in his duty just because he does not want to hire a new one so in this case, he is treating his employee as

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    You are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you expect other people to keep their promises, then you are obligated to keep your own promises. If we apply Kant’s theory in social terms, it emphasizes on the respect for the person because each person has moral dignity. Therefore, no person could exclusively treat another as a means to his/her own end. One must make the right decisions for the right reasons.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universal Law Case Study

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    People can not violate the human rights or deprive themselves because people consider helping others is not their business. My conclusion is that Kant has a clear idea of how to question ourselves about this simple actions. To be responsible for our own body, life, welfare, happiness and also to be honest, to be a man of honor, and to help others to succeed in life. At the end of the day, we all are human beings striving to survive and pursuing happiness.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant supports the categorical imperative with three different rules, all of which convince me that we have moral duties to ourselves because these rules are in a sense applicable to everyday life. The three rules include the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in the Kingdom of ends. Universal law is discussed first where Kant states, “There is only one categorical imperative. It is an act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Critique of Judgment, Immanuel Kant debunks the idea that beauty is an objective property. To achieve this, he distinguishes between the pleasure on the soul that agreement, goodness, and beauty evoke. In Kant’s views, by claiming something is beautiful, you are not stating a property of the objective but more so the subjective, what the subject feels about the object. Unlike Hume and Burke of the empiricists, who have an experience of liking when they express something as beautiful, Kant indicates that the liking we express is sourced from our judgment of taste. Kant experiences a transcendental perception of beauty whereas Hume and Burke experience an empirical perception, in which something beautiful affects our sensations in the…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "Immanual Kant believed ethical principles to be self-evident. All a person needed to do Kant thought was to concider whether a purposed action could serve as an universal lawwithout self…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    This categorical imperative is the source of Kant’s moral philosophy. From it, we can derive whether any specific action is moral or immoral. For example, suicide cannot possibly be counted as moral in this model. In self-murder, a person uses human life as a means to the end of escaping trouble or pain. Humanity is an unalterable end, and rationale prevents us from putting other inclinations over the preservation of our life.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who was born on April 22, 1724. He is a central figure in modern philosophy. One of his biggest works is “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” that was written in 1785. Kant argued that right actions are only right if those actions are not instigated by impulses or desires, but by practical reason. He believes that actions are only right if it fulfills one’s duty.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant is a phenomenal philosopher whose works has shaped the nature of western philosophy. He has made profound contributions in metaphysics and ethics through academic articles like The Critique of Pure Reason, which has intense knowledge on topics like what man can possibly know. I. Kant challenged the concept of suicide. a. Kant believed in human autonomy and believed that freedom has paramount importance taking precedence over life itself. i. One should believe the reason, because one has duties to perform regardless of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of a situation.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant has an interesting approach to ethics, one that many people would agree with. Contrary to Aristotle, Kant believes ethics should be based on good will. Meaning, we should look at moral actions not by finding the good in the action, but doing the action with goodness. He explains how this can be done with his categorical imperative and the two formulations of it. These formulations help us decide whether or not our actions are based off of goodwill or our own inclinations.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant implies that any being that has autonomy and rationality should always treat others with autonomy and rationality as an end. Yet, Kant doesn 't clearly state how people are supposed to treat other humans as an end. The Principle of Humanity doesn 't give us a road map on how to apply a moral action. Kant would most likely reply to this response by saying that people have autonomy and rationality and should know what the moral action of a situation is. Even with Kant’s response, there are still many situations that we might not be able to determine what the moral action is.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strived to make morality and the same principles compliment all beings and make them view the world in only one way, his way. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that believed morality is based on reason and not passion and it could be provable by reason as well. Kant’s ethics are all based off of the fundamental principle of morality, which comes with the freedom of your character and helping people, which was morally correct in his viewpoint. Kant speaks about the idea of freedom and the fundamental principle of morality. He explains that the reason that people are promoted to accomplish the correct action is because of freedom.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays