Oxford Dictionary describes it as “A large, hairy apelike creature resembling a yeti, supposedly found in North West America.” In this definition they use the word “supposedly,” supporting that they don’t even know where they are found. Another word used for big foot is Yeti. The Oxford Dictionary defines yeti as “A large hairy creature resembling a human or bear, said to live in the highest part of the Himalayas.” Reading this two definition, it is still unclear where this bigfoot originated. Now the question is which definition is correct? Does bigfoot live in Northwest America or in the mountain range in Asia? Or is the definition correct, does bigfoot exists? No one really know where and if big foot real …show more content…
This big monster is going unnoticed for all of these years. Josh Fox, the writer of Top 10 Reason Bigfoot Does Not Exist, proposes a “point being that if tens of thousands of 8-foot tall, 500 pound ape-men were out there, we would have found them by now.” If there are many big foot monster roaming around this earth, then it should be easier to find them. You would think. It is not very common of people saying they saw them, never the less notice them in a herd. There is no way that just a couple of yeti roaming the North-West America or in the Himalayans. In order for them to reproduce, they have to be a lot of them around, but yet we do not see them or hear about