Mark Chanko Case Study

Improved Essays
Life is foundationally good on its own. In modern predominant religions, life has been viewed as intrinsically good and worth preserving. Medical professionals and caregivers’ primary objectives are to provide quality health care and protect patients’ interests. In the case of Mark Chanko, a man who had his death filmed and then shown for others’ entertainment, his caregivers did not hold up their end, and violated his rights to privacy by allowing the filming without his, nor his family’s consent. Charles Ornstein’s article raises questions on few special ethical rights being violated. The article describes a case of Mark Chanko, who was struck by the private sanitation truck on his way home from the grocery store. The ABC television show “NY Med” filmed Mark Chanko’s final moments without the approval of him or his family. In Chanko case, live broadcasting the moments leading someone’s death clearly holds some moral issues. The most significant moral issue in the case of Chanko, is how it is unethical to film patients’ situation without his permission, nor his family permission. Mr. Chanko has the right to privacy during the medical treatment, like any of us. Sharing the information with someone who are not directly or indirectly involve in patients’ health improvement might seems questionable. In addition, the …show more content…
People must first and foremost follow the laws where they are needed, and NY Med did not break any laws. Further, when the Chanko’s filed suit against the hospital, the lawsuit was dropped because Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) does not allow the patients to sue, if the doctors and hospital violate their privacy. Instead, the NewYork-Presbyterian’s lawyers argued that the Chanko themselves are responsible for the lost of Mr. Chanko’s privacy, since they expose his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Abstract Law is formed for a motive and it regulates in many areas like medicine, before practicing any medical procedure or conducting a form of administrative position each medical specialist or non-medical specialist operative must comprehend a difference between ethical or unethical. Ethical and Unethical plays a significant role in our humanity every way it is whether up to how you want to approach it. According to “The case of Jeanette M. And the phone call” altered from the beginning of chapter 1 of “Medical Law and Ethics” inscribed by Bonnie Fremgen, it exemplifies how a medical receptionist and the doctor action resulted in death of Jeanette M. This case falls into so many categories of violations and code of ethics such as being…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There Is No “Right” to Healthcare,” by John David Lewis Thesis: Healthcare is not suitably a guaranteed right for persons because it would infringe on the rights of doctors, is paradoxical, and it goes against the freedoms defined by the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Premise 1: The basis of all rights that are laid out in in the US Constitution are to protect the individual, not the wishes of the society or of other individuals. Requiring a doctor to perform care that other’s wish for would infringe on his or her rights to pursue the career envisioned. Premise 2: It is not right to force one person to act in helping another person at their own expense, even if the other person needs the help to survive.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Timothée Guichoux Contemporary Moral Issues Essay#1-Question 3 Opposing Brock and Velleman on the moral permissibility of a right to die Euthanasia, or the act of killing (active euthanasia), or permitting (passive euthanasia), the death of a patient, is a practice that goes back to Ancient Age and that was dealt by authors such as Socrates or Plato. However, the debate about the moral permissibility of such things as euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, in which the patient ends his/her life with drugs provided by a physician but self-administered, is still dividing moral thinkers. We will examine the arguments of texts by Dan Brock and David Velleman to answer the following question: How does our approach to the concept of dignity…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    New York City College of Technology City University of New York Law and Ethics Case: Jeanette M. and the Phone Call Erica Rotstein October 7, 2017 Professor Bonsignore HAS 3560 -Legal Aspects of Health Care Abstract The advancement in the field of medicine over the years has led to doctors and health care providers having more responsibilities on their hands. This brings into question what should and shouldn’t be done, as well as what is morally and ethically right. However, this isn’t so cut and dry.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henrietta Lacks Ethical debates and dilemmas are common in healthcare today. The Henrietta Lacks story was no exception. Her cells were taken without her knowledge and used to form a HeLa cell line, which has been used extensively in medical research (Arts & Entertainment, {A & E}, 2017). The purpose of this paper is to inform others about the Henrietta Lacks story and how ethical issues are relevant to this case.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Selzer’s “Mercy” explores the idea of a medical murder, from a morphine injection to a not so medical strangulation thought. The paranoid doctor contemplates his morals as a suffering man is on his death bed. In this doctor’s mind, there is a difference between murder for medical purposes and just plain murder. Murders, or at least the murders portrayed on TV shows, are almost…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter four, titled Contracts and Intentional Torts, pertains to the various laws surrounding physician and patient relationships. A major case that is presented in the chapter pertains to a woman’s false imprisonment by a physician. The case is known as Stowers v. Wolodzko, and it outlines the physician’s rights versus a patient’s rights in a legal lawsuit. The case depicts the restriction of a person’s freedom, assault and battery, and malpractice.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Usually we hear of stories where physicians get sued because they fail to abide by a patient’s wishes, however, the article “All-Time Craziest Frivolous Lawsuits”, (Krane 2014), discusses how a physician was sued for abiding to a patient’s wishes. The article provides insight into how some malpractice lawsuits impact physicians who try to provide patients with standard of care, only to have care refused by them and then later have legal action taken against them for complying with their wishes. The author best explains how physicians are affected by malpractice lawsuits in stating, “The assault on their reputations and the emotional upheaval they face can be traumatic even when the lawsuit is obviously fraudulent” (Krane, 2014, p. 1). This particular article discusses the story of a man who cut his hand off because he “saw the number ‘666’ written on it and stated that he heard voices which told him to cut it off. When the on-call surgeon was called in for a consult, the patient stated that if the surgeon reattached his arm, “he would cut it off again” (Krane, 2014, p. 1).…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    HIPAA Compliance Essay

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    conflicted with certain practices in health care settings; for instance, third party businesses needing access to personal medical records for the purposes of treatment, payment, and operations (Solove, 2013). Another unintended issue that HIPAA’s implementation stirred was the belief that it would bankrupt the industry. Investment in new health information security systems were deemed by government officials along with health care providers as a costly endeavor, and with the stipulation of financial penalties as a consequence for not obtaining such technology, this would ultimately lead to the bankruptcy of the U.S. health care industry (Solove, 2013). An additional unintended outcome of the implementation of HIPAA, was the denial of access of PHI for consumers. Before the modification of the privacy rule, there were instances of patients, caregivers, and others being denied access to their PHI to the justification of abiding by privacy rules (Solove, 2014).…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Law and Policy Paper: Stark Law Many laws and policies that are passed into legislation focus on the ever-important topic of healthcare. From the Health Insurance and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly called the Affordable Care Act [ACA]) of today, healthcare is an issue that will forever be in the forefront of our societal concerns. However, the law I chose to discuss here is the Limitation on Certain Physician Referrals, more commonly known as the Stark Law. The Stark Law is of specific interest to me because it has had an extensive impact on specialist physicians, particularly orthopaedic surgeons as the law was unambiguously tailored to inhibit certain referrals by orthopaedic…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Doctor assisted suicide is a huge controversy around the world. Only five countries and five states explicitly allow for doctor assisted suicide to go completely unpunished. Doctor assisted suicide is suicide by the patient with medication or information provided by a doctor who has knowledge of the patient’s intent. This is different from euthanasia because the doctor is not actually performing the act, just providing the means and knowledge to do so. There are many arguments for and against doctor assisted suicide that use rhetorical appeals to further their argument.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stark Law Case Study

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a controversial issue in regards to whether or not the actions of Dr. S. and Dr. V. violated Stark Law. The Stark Law is a federal statute which imposing doctors and physicians are not allowed to referrer their patients to facilities in which they have affiliations with. This law was implemented based on the case of Dr. S. and Dr. V., in which they leased a nuclear camera to refrain from sending their patients to another center. I do believe that the actions of Dr. S. and Dr. V. were a violation of the Stark Law. One of the first violations of Dr. S. and Dr. V. was the decision to lease their own camera without taking inconsideration the impact it would have on the outside parties.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Mallon Case Study

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is difficult to decide where the rights of one citizen stop, and the rights of all other citizens begin. In the case of Mary Mallon, health care officials placed the greater good of the population above the rights of an individual, for the right reasons. However, officials at the New York City Health Department went about it in the wrong way. I do not think Mary should have been kept in isolation for the rest of her life. However, I do believe she was given a fair chance at a normal life when she was told to stop cooking.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Severely ill patients need to be isolated, yet when a case is unverified or when the individual was just exposed or even was suspected of being uncovered, the restricting of freedom appears to be problematical (Bayer & Fairchild, 2004). Under harm principle, it is only serious harm to others which causes damage, against others’ will and restrict their liberty that can warrant intervention, not harm to self (Feinberg, 1987). Accordingly, an individual has the right to not seek medical help and resist the treatment of his own disease according to harm principle for it is themselves that they are hurting. In this case, it is undeniable that health care workers have the right to liberty and are not obligated to expose the privacy and report the heath status. Mill’s principle of harm clearly defined that one shall have the freedom to act as long as his action is not deprive others liberty or impede their efforts to obtain it (Mill, n.d.).…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays