Kant's Violation Of Moral Rules

Improved Essays
Kant believes that moral rules are not analytic but synthetic. They are not true just by the meaning of the words. We need to put something together (mental operation) just an operating of reason. For instance, for Kant killing people is wrong just by the definitions of the word but by reasoning. For example, if my car is red, I need to see it to know it. Therefore, morality involves a rational action which need rationally that can come also from a priori. For Kant morality must derived from reason because experience cannot tell whether an action is from duty, moral laws are for all rational creatures, so merely human experience won’t get us there, and there are judged by some standard. Duty tells you if we are being moral, because we as people …show more content…
Therefore, if a person is doing something for the consequence that such an acting may brought they he/she is doing it for the wrong reasons. According to Kant the only thing “good without limitation is a good will that performs actions solely for sake of duty”(compare to utilitarians). Therefore, acting for sake of duty tells you are being …show more content…
For this, it means that there is a notion of law or principles being followed. Thus, acting from one 's duty, permits one 's action to set off any inclinations, they may have abided by the law by following it. This is not about goals or purpose but about our principles and this apply to everybody. Additionally, for Kant “good will” should be exercised even in the absence of good effects because moral truths are based on reason, thus it becomes a moral law. For instance, if a person knows that what he/she is doing is wrong, then this person is not exercising good will. Therefore, a person is only exercising good will if he/she knows that what he/she is doing is the right thing to do and not because he/she is expecting a reward or a positive feeling from this act. Then a person is only exercising good will when he/she is acting in accordance with her duty. For Kant you cannot tell if an actions is good just by looking because moral duties should come from reasoning, which determines the will (makes you do the things that you do). Moral truths are not received from a high through divine revelation or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the reading, “Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals”, Kant talks about motives which describes why people do the things that they do. The chapter that I will be focusing on is chapter 1, which the overall summary is if a person is acting from a sense of duty. Kant also explains the difference between doing something from duty and doing things for another reason. If I am acting from duty, I perform the action anyway even though it may not be in my interest. If I do something in accordance with duty, then I am performing the action because it pleases me and it is in my interest.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter one of Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant argues that human’s purpose is not happiness, mainly in order to further defend his previous claim that a good will can be considered good without any necessary qualification. Kant agrees with the principle that no instrument for any purpose would be found in a being unless it was the most appropriate instrument for that purpose. This is why he claims that nature would have made a grave mistake if it burdened reason with finding happiness. Happiness, he writes, could be “attained far more surely by instinct than it ever could be by reason”. Instinct seems to mesh much better with finding happiness than reason does, as reason can cause desires to be skewed, while instinct…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory discusses this in great detail and states, “an action is morally correct if its maxim can be willed as a universal law.” specifically, “actions that have both moral worth and moral correctness are morally good actions. ”(pp.158) Moreover, Kant contended, “an act’s moral worth depends on the reason for which it is done, it is not enough that the act conforms to duty; it also must be done for the sake of duty.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Appiah Intuition

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant believes on the un-conditionality of commands and he believes that the empirical moral philosophy or moral anthropology as the may call it, is grounded on principles inferred through experience or observation and they are limited to telling us how people act but not how to…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since I have I have deprived the will of every impulse that might arise for it from obeying any particular law, there is nothing left to serve the will” (Kant, 1998, pg14)One is able to be good without the need of qualification of being good. Human nature and a…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Stumpf pg. 285) Equally moral knowledge is similar to scientific knowledge in the aspect they derive from a priori judgments. Kant knows rationality has to do with morality and being aware of regulations of behavior, both deemed widespread and obligatory. (Stumpf pg. 286) Any human being would think before they act and this is due to our consciousness of rules which makes us coherent individuals. When asking the question, “What is the best choice?”…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant's Golden Rule

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I believe that Kant would argue that the previous statement isn't moral for multiple different reasons. First off, Kant says that in order to form the categorical imperative then you must have no moral reasoning at all when coming to a conclusion. Therefore, by volunteering with a motive you're going against the rules of Kant by allowing moral perceptions to get in the way of the actual situation at hand. Secondly, Kant solidified the idea of the "golden rule" when it comes to decision making. If you apply the rule in this situation you would end up with something similar to this; I'm okay with someone doing 'x' activity for me because it benefits that persons only reasoning behind it is that it benefits themselves.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Analysis

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant is unique; not only for the time it was written, but to this day as well. Unique to modern interpretations of ethics, Kant believed in an objective morality. However, this wasn’t an uncommon belief for the time. What set Kant’s philosophy apart from his predecessors was his belief that morality came from logic and reason as opposed to God’s will. While Kant disagrees with his fellow moral objectivists on where morals come from, it is important to understand what they agreed on: they all reject utilitarianism and the belief that morality is derived from actions that produce maximum happiness.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the major tenets with this theory is that morality is based strictly on the intentions of an individual rather than on the consequences of an action itself. The problem with this aspect of this theory is that we can have the greatest intentions possible but still have catastrophic consequences. Secondly, Kant argued that for an act to be moral, that it must always be done from duty. The problem here is that if we adhere to the “wrong” moral laws to begin with, then even if we have and engage in perfect duty to those laws, then our actions would also be wrong by default. Then of course, those duties have to universal and without contradiction.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant explains that developing a “metaphysics of morals” help us gain a clear understanding of moral principles to align them with our moral duties. Kant argues moral principles are not based on factors such as circumstances, needs, and desires; they derive from a priori concepts. He makes the claims that actions are considered moral if they are performed without underlying motives, not on the basis of consequences, and not based out of mere duty. Kant is not a consequentialist and thinks intentions behind an action determines if it is good or bad. This is interrelated with the concept of good will.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, Immanuel Kant believes a moral action is dependent on intentions and good will. Good will is our ability for steady commitment to doing our duty for its own sake and ability to know our duty (Restrepo, “What Is the Principle of Humanity”). To deem an action to be moral is to…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant imposes the idea of the “purity of the will” which expands on the principle that one should act…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals,” Immanuel Kant developed a philosophy of morality that was considered “pure” philosophy, a philosophy that was completely independent of subjective personal experience or perception. In that work, Kant presents the idea that ethical decisions should be based on a priori reasoning which is a type of reasoning that is based on logical observations, not experiences. Kant breaks these actions into the categories of good will and categorical imperatives, which he further analyzes through the lens of the formulas for universal law and humanity. Through the development of these concepts, Kant creates a way to understand moral values and arrive at a universal set of maxims through use of reason. Kant says,…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics