The Good Will In Kant's Deontological Approach

Improved Essays
Kant came out with his theory in answer to the utilitarianist views that were being used at the same time. Those views were focused on the outcome of an action and how much happiness it caused. Kant however, with his moral theory took a more deontological approach. His approach is deontological because it focuses on what should be done regardless of the outcome. For example , if someone tries to do something nice for you, but messes up and causes more problems. According to Kant you cannot blame them for trying to help you because they caused some problems. That is what makes Kant 's view different from those of his time and also makes it deontological.

There is an aspect that gets taken into account when taking Kant 's deontological approach to his moral theory and that is the good will. In Kant 's opinion the good will is doing the right thing because it is the right thing to do, not because you will in some
…show more content…
What that means is that if person A wanted to steal from person B they would take into account two things, is this the right thing to do, and if so would it be universally accepted. Obviously, stealing s not the right thing to do, but this depends on person A 's intentions. They could be trying to steal something that was stolen from them or just trying to steal. Let 's suppose person A 's reason to steal was just to steal from person B. Following the first formulation of the categorical imperative this would not be the right thing to do because one cannot simply will stealing to become a universal law. So, to apply this first formulation to an action one must think of an action and then think if it would become a universally accepted

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If a duty is contrary to duty, in self interest, considers love then it is not in good will. A Kantian would accept the condition of control because Kant states that when deciding what action to make it be in accordance with the good will (moral worth, in accordance with duty). So, in above scenario where both agents drove home and agent 2 happened to hit and kill a kid (being out of their control) without intending to do so. Kantians would say that because both agents had good intentions and that they both were in accordance with the good will that they were acting in good will (in accordance with duty). Kant’s ethics is more concerned with the motivation (reasoning for doing it) of an agents actions and not the goodness of the consequences of those actions therefore making Kantian ethics a deontological ethical theory meaning its an ethical position that judged the morality of an actions based on duty, obligation, or rule.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Moral Theory makes an action right and wrong. Utilitarianism(Mill), Deontology(Kant), Virtue Ethics( Aristotle), and Care Ethics (Held) are some of the moral theories introduced by ancient great philosophers. These principles or theories are used in resolving difficulties and making the moral decisions. Mill introduced an idea of Utilitarianism, the moral worth of an action based on its consequences. Immanuel Kant’s theory of Deontology is the moral worth of an action determined by the principle or law upon which action is based.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant was the first person to outline the basic tenets of deontology. To understand Kant’s theory, we must first understand the terms Kant used to describe it. These terms are will, duty, maxim, and categorical imperative. Will is an immaterial concept Kant ascribes to all human beings as the power and ability to make a rational moral decision. As discussed in lecture, duty is a compulsion, or moral obligation to act in a manner we should act as opposed to acting on our inclinations to feel good or receive gains.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant examined the world of ethics through a deontological, or duty-based, approach. In doing so, he argued that the morality of an action is determined by the action’s adherence to rules or the ability to fulfill one’s duty. Through this deontological approach, Kant held that some acts are always wrong, regardless of whether or not the act results in a favorable outcome. In other words, in terms of morality, he claimed that the consequences of an action are irrelevant. Instead, his theory placed emphasis on the principles behind an action.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a man walks into a store and sees an expensive item he wants, but cannot afford, he devises a plan to steal it. This is not moral according to the categorical imperative because that would mean that theft would need to become universal law. The best way to think about it is, categorical imperative means that for an action to be considered moral than that action must be moral enough for it to become universal law and every other person would be allowed to do it. I believe Kant is correct in saying that “a human being, and in general every rational being, does exist as an end in himself, not merely as a means to be used by this or what will as it pleases.” (Kant, 436).…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is true that when a person feels he or she has been done wrong, thought right away is “what if I did the same too you?” and the idea that people should not be a means to an end. Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory that I believe rightly stands on the idea that simply being dependent on maximizing the good despite the action is okay. Consequentialist focus more on the majority and I believe that just because the majority might overcome the minority, fairness is a still a virtue that comes into play along with the guilt when playing fair is not exercised. Kant works through the construction of his theory by offering consistency as a necessary component to a moral code.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Deontology

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Loosely defined Kant’s deontology is that ethics should be based on consistent, logical thinking. His theory rests in the roots of duty and goodwill. He argues that one is ought to do the right thing merely for its own sake. The main concept of the theory starts with considering all possible optional actions. Subsequent concepts are: applying universality, eliminating all options that could not logically be moral standards for everyone; apply respect for persons, eliminating all options that exploit anyone; all remaining options represent ethical actions.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In more simple terms, the formulation translates to act on a maxim, or a motivating principle, that you would want to become a universal law. The key factor in the first formulation of the categorical imperative is the idea of a universal law. Kant stresses that one must rationalize whether their action should be applied universally. For example, if a man is considering lying because it is more convenient for him, then he must rationally decide whether the maxim could be applied universally. If the maxim is lying when convenient, then the man must imagine how the world would be if, universally, people lied when convenient.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emmanuel Kant was an 18th century philosopher that developed the idea deontology. Kant is not trying to convince that morality exists but instead that people behave in a way that they themselves call moral. Kant questions what does it mean to be good? In his conclusion the only thing that is good, is the good will. The will to do good is always good and this is not to get something out of the will to do good.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kantianism is the normative moral theory of ethics which was proposed by the 18th century German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Immanuel Kant lived at the height of the European enlightenment and he believed that reason is as important in moral philosophy as it is in epistemology. Kant’s ethics are deontological in nature, which means he follows the understanding that the moral worth of an action is derived from something intrinsic to the act itself. This contrasts to the consequentialist theory of Utilitarianism which follows the rule that any action, regardless of how unmoral it may seem, could be justified as long as it generates good consequences. This view proves a problem for Kantians as they believe the consequences of an action are often out with our control and it is very difficult to determine what they will be.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, as long as the moral law does not depend on our desires, it consists of what is called ‘categorical imperatives’ in Kant’s philosophical works (Gakuran…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays