Dax Cowart Case Study

Superior Essays
Growing up in rural North Dakota, it was not an uncommon practice for farmers to put down sick or severely injured animals, whether it was a deer hit by a car or a cow with severe pneumonia. The idea is it is inhumane to allow animals to suffer, and in fact, not many people would actively condone the suffering of any living being; however, human and animal suffering is usually not seen as equivalent. Human life, often considered as intrinsically more valuable, is given much more consideration in terms of the possibility of a better future or fulfilling life; even to the point that human suffering is not deemed to be inhumane as long as there is hope for a meaningful life. However, hope for a better future is not a guarantee that the future …show more content…
While his treatment by the staff in the hospital and rehab would not happen in the same manner today, the pain and agony of his burns are still experienced by other burn victims or victims of severe smoke inhalation. For Dax, he was rushed to the hospital and started on painkillers along with sedation, but the combination of the two was not enough to control his pain. He claims the pain was excruciating throughout his treatments in the hospital and asked to die on many occasions, including immediately after the accident when he asked the farmer who found him to shoot him to end the pain. In modern times, this is still a possible scenario, especially for severely injured firefighters and first responders who have experience with rescuing those with burn injuries. These individuals may request to die before treatment is even administered so not to experience the same suffering as they witnessed in the people whom were …show more content…
First and foremost, it is important to recognize that past decisions should not be justified with future knowledge. There are many hypothetical situations and what-if statements that can help with future decision-making, but the "all's well ends well" logic fails because a good future cannot be guaranteed. The biggest problem that Dax Cowart faced was the fact that his pain was not controlled and in his words "one hour was an eternity, with the pain I was going through". To focus on other hypothetical situations, such as "what if your pain was controlled?", what if you had better support?", or as Dr. Burt puts it "how realistic were your expectations?" detracts from the immediate issue of is it more humane to allow a patient in agony to die, or to persuade him or her to continue

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I support Jecker and Pagon’s side. Futility and inhumanity have medical and moral meanings and can be useful in deciding whether to continue or withdraw medical intervention. The main goal of a physician is to make sure that their patient benefits from the treatment. Such as in the case they described of Michael, the infant born with prune belly syndrome, the child was not born to live a full and healthy life right from the start. The doctors tried their best in the short three months of his life, but it was next to impossible to remain hopeful of fixing him.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cowart Case Summary

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Later on Dax continued going through the rehabilitation process and still wished to die and he kept asking others to participate in his death. He did state that the real reason he really wanted to die was all because the pain throughout the whole process was truly unbearable and even if he does enjoy his life now, he still believes that every person has the right as to what can or cannot be done to their body; patient autonomy isn’t something that can be compromised, and ultimately the decision always lies with the patient as to what should be done with their body in a hospital. While looking at this case the doctors and nurses and those who assisted him in the ambulance and the farmer who called the 911, they were all just doing what was right.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dax Informed Consent Case

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Every individual is different and medical decisions are made collaboratively. The testimony of the injured patient relies on the subjective belief of the abuse, circumstances, and the consent to the medical procedures (Harris, 2008, p. 201). Therefore, in the Dax’s case the excruciatingly painful Clorox baths in an immersion tank is an issue of subjective belief of abuse, even though it is circumstantial. I believe that Dax was liable to be informed of the disclosure of the extraordinary painful procedure and timeframe of its execution.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The agricultural/food industry has been in many argument about how animals and crops are being raised and killed to feed the american people. Michael Pollan uses his selection “An Animal’s Place” to defend his right to eat as he pleases. While, Blake Hurst uses his article “The Omnivore’s Delusion” to shield post-modern farming techniques from a mass of uneducated critics. Now, read as these two duke it out against their opponents to see if they can live as they want. Michael Pollan, a writer/activist, fights for his right to animals as he sees fit.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The misconception with equine slaughtering is rooted deep in what really happens. Imagine hundreds of horses, some retired champions, a little girl’s pony, or horses who did nothing wrong, all bound for slaughter that are packed in trucks and shipped for more than twenty four hours at a time, without food, water, or rest. Fear runs through their veins. As it should, because the method used to exterminate these animals, after the long journey, are far from painless and sometimes they even remain conscious during the dismemberment process (ASPCA).…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am writing to you, Jeremy Rifkin, today to talk about the article that you have written “A Change of Heart about Animals”. In the article you talk about how animals do have at least basic human feelings and if not more. That “many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined”. That we should do something about how we treat the animals around us. I absolutely agree with you and think we should treat the animals around us differently than we do now.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Animal extortion is an ongoing issue in relationship to animal welfare and rights. There seems to be some ethical areas that individuals feel need to be changed on how humans use animals for human personal benefits. The argument supporting animal extortion and maltreatment has been the same for generations, including this view on animals used for experiments, “These benefits to humans far outweigh the costs in suffering that relatively few animals have had to endure. Society has an obligation to maximize the opportunities to produce such beneficial consequences, even at the cost of inflicting some pain on animals” (Andre & Velasquez, 1988). When looking at public policy and a resolution, it becomes a question of overcoming this…

    • 2353 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ethical treatment of animals should be taken more seriously because of the cruelty suffered by animals at amusement events, factories and in the research field. Animals ethics is a term to describe the way the human reacts with the animal and how the animal should properly be treated. Many philosophers believe that since animals doesn’t have the moral judgement that humans have, then anyone can do whatever they want to do them because they don’t know right from wrong. An animal is very important, the animal will know if what is happening to them is normal or not, many things people do to them wouldn’t be something they experience on a daily basis. Animals doesn't deserve to be treated any differently than humans.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay’s objective is to present both sides of the issue, allowing the reader to further investigate and form their own ethical stance for or against animal rights. For many, it is…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The practices and methods, of killing animals that goes on in the animal farm, needs to be Changed. Pollan states that”… to ensure that farm animals don’t suffer and that their deaths are swift and painless (374) Such practices are not the natural way of rearing this animals. Animals can feel pain, the process of making them go through this pain before they are killed is not necessary. The animals should be treated and cared for in a respectful manner and they should have a healthy living environment where they can be free to move around stretch and interact with their physical environment. This will free us from the guilt that we inflict pain on animals when we kill them for meat if we adopt this change of using a more human (painless) method of killing…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays