Observing The Israel-Palestine Conflict Analysis

Improved Essays
Realism has long been used as an approach to international relations. Whether it be classical or structural realism they both share similar origins. Both of these approaches to realisms are based on the idea that states are the main actors in an anarchic international system and these states want to maximize their power in order to survive. Observing the realism seen the Israel-Palestine conflict is important because it allows one to get another perspective of the issue. Not only does it allows one to gain a new perspective of the conflict but as Hans Morgenthau preached in his works, the idea that states define their goals in terms of power and this simple fact allows people to contextualize events and then predict future actions of state. …show more content…
To start off the idea of a unified state would be a risky choice due to the long history of violence and hate between the two groups. This then leaves the option of a two state solution which is the most promising one despite the previous failed attempts to achieve this. It is in the interest of the United States to achieve a two state solution for two reasons. First, Israel is the United States strongest ally in the Middle East and a significant amount of influence would be lost there if no peaceful solution was reached there. How would it look to the international community and other states in the region if the United States could not even convince a strong ally to engage in peace negotiations. Secondly, Israel’s actions towards palestine contradict the democratic and humanitarian ideals the United States stands for. In his farewell address George Washington said, “Washington called for just and fair conduct in U.S. diplomacy with other nations, but also warned that the republic should avoid long-term animosity and or friendship with other countries, and to take care to avoid foreign influences in our politics.” (internal citation). Israel ignorance to the United States’s warnings undermines major key aspects to the United States’s foreign policy, which are built around humanitarian and spreading democracy. This could potentially cause the United States to lose some of its global power. In a realist perspective this is one of the worst thing that can happen to a state because a loss of power mean a loss of national security. Therefore the United States needs to take a firm stance with Israel by telling them to reengage in peace negotiations with Palestine to restore the hope for a two state

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 13 Outline

    • 4056 Words
    • 17 Pages

    After the Statement was written conflicts came about between the Palestinians and the Jewish…

    • 4056 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With the creation of Israel in 1948 the United States has always sided with Israel. After the creation of Israel, President Truman was the first out of all the world leaders to recognize the country. The United States had backed and has tried to support Israel throughout all of their issues with the Middle East since their creation. It was not until President Obama came into the presidency. That some problems with Israel began to arise and tensions began to form with how Israel was handling things.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When George W. Bush became president his policy towards Israel brought forth the idea of Palestine becoming a state on its own. President George W. Bush believed that this policy would bring the end to the fighting and ongoing and never-ending tension between Israel and Palestine. He did however understand that if we as a country could not find a solution to bring peace to those that Israel has tension with. That Israel would once again take matters into their own hands and do everything in their power, since they receive aid from the United States, to put an end to their enemies if confronted. When Israel started their settlements the United States realized that it would bring more problems than solutions.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Israel Dbq

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States realized that Israel was defending itself and that it needed help with it. The US continued to help Israel by supplying them with all kinds of goods, such as three billion dollars in foreign aid every year, which is one fifth of the United States’ foreign aid money. (Doc. 2) Even civilians of everyday life in the US realized Israel needed help, because the knew all Israel wanted was peace between the two bickering races. Israel was demanded to give up land in exchange for peace, but received known whatsoever, so US knew they had to step in and help.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Louisiana Purchase International relations is driven by many things with those things being theories, these theories then for the international events that in turn formed the modern state system that is in place today. The Louisiana Purchase was an even that occurred mainly between France and The United States with some relations with Spain. The Louisiana Purchase and the realist point of view it was completed from was one of the many events that helped formed today’s modern state system. The Louisiana Purchase was a deal between France and The United States that led to the exchange of a large portion of land in the Western hemisphere. France explored the land around the Mississippi River and settled in many different places around the region…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Through, the lens of a realist, the Oslo Accords failed because it diminishes the power that each government had prior to the signing of the agreements. Israel wants to be the hegemon and therefore does anything in its power to diminish Palestine's authority. According to a recent map, the land mass between the Israeli's and Palestinians is unequal. Israel's land mass is greater. Which, violates the Oslo accords because the land was to be split evenly.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and Liberalism are theories in international politics that have different levels of analysis. Nevertheless, many key differences and similarities go hand in hand when talked about the Post World War II. Realism is a theory essentially about power and security. Many political actors and states view the world as a dangerous place and only the strong will survive.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism is a school of thought that emphasized foreign policy makers to focus on mutual interests in order to promote the coexistence of all societies (Dunne & Schmidt, 2014, p. 100). However realism has undergone many renaissances to come to promote coexistence of all societies. It became institutional post World War II as world powers looked to work together under reason d’etat which according to historian Frederich Meinecke is “the fundamental principle of international conflict, the state 's first law of motion “It tells the statesman what he must do to preserve health and strength of the state (1957:1)” (Dunne, Schmidt, 2014, p.100). Realism preaches the security of all societies locally and globally.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my view, Woodrow Wilson was not a realist. Some of his actions could be grounded in some minute aspects of realism, but in analysing the core foundations of realism, Wilson was not a realist. Wilson was predominantly a strong idealist and his idealistic views on a global order influenced his actions. To be persuaded by my claim, it will be critical to understand what realism is, and how realists view global governance. This will provide the foundation to assess Wilson’s actions towards achieving global order, which essentially embodied who he was as a leader and an individual, were not characteristic of a realist.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conflict Against Israelis

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There has been several stabbing incidents by Palestinians against Israelis, which began in early October. Palestinians have attacked Jerusalem and central and northern Israel, and in the West Bank. The conflict between Israelis and Palestinians began due to the two communities clashing at Jerusalem, the holy site in September. On October 18, 2015, an Israeli soldier was killed, along with many others wounded, during a gun and knife attack at a bus station located in the city of Beersheva. According to BBC News and a local police chief, Yoram Levi, “One armed terrorist entered the central bus station and shot at a soldier and killed him… he managed to escape the central bus station but ran into forces, was shot and killed.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Within international relations there are quite a few different political theories and perspectives. Realism is known as being one of the oldest theory which is also known as political realism, it’s a view within international relations which condones the idea of competition for power and the conflict side of things for example wars. Theories like idealism and liberalism is usually used to contrast the idea of realism because they encourage the idea of cooperation. The realist view point is about looking out for your own state, being protective of their own security, thinking about their own national interest and the struggle of both gaining and keeping the power. Realists usually believe that the international system is directed by anarchy,…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism explains international relations in terms of power. According to the Pearson Revel e-textbook, it is a theory with international relations that bases its foundation is dominance. Within Realism, there are certain core assumptions about how the world and it’s states work. It firstly assumes that human nature is selfish, therefore believing that the causes of state behavior comes from a rational pursuit of self-interest. Realism also argues that the most important actors are states.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The realist and liberalist theories are two rival ideas of international relations that make fundamentally opposing assumptions about both human character and the nature of the environment of international politics. Both of the competing theories have their origins in a different state of international conflict or collaboration and in judging which school of thought makes the most realistic and practical assumptions about the post-Cold War world, it is required to judge which theory’s assumptions can better be generalised outside of the time and state of the world in which they were first proposed. As an approach to international politics, realism can be seen as a response to the utopian thought that occupied the thoughts of students of international…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Realism and liberalism are the two main theories in the international relations field. Realism describes about a pessimistic selfish world, a world that war can easily happen because of the seeking power of all nations. Liberalism believe in optimistic world that nation will cooperated to play the “win-win game”, in which means that sides get theirs advantages and the existence of would decrease. This essay would explain about these two theories and would attempt to analyze the crisis in Ukraine 2014 based on the foundation of two theories. Realism is a view of international politics that stresses on the competiveness and conflict.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays