State Autonomy Theory

Great Essays
Behind every developed country, there are political figures, behind every political figure, there is an individual, an individual who has lived a unique social background, consequently leading to the development of assumptions based off of their personal life experiences. This is quite important because these experiences have affected us, the citizens, in the manner that it has eventually led to how society looks like today. As the diverse mass of individuals we are, it is always up to debate, especially within political figures, how power should be distributed and how different groups are to interact with and control other groups. This, has eventually led to the development of different power theories which include pluralism, state autonomy, …show more content…
G. (2005) “state autonomy theorists assert predominant power is located in [the] government, not in the general citizenry or a dominant social class… [this theory employs] the phrase ‘the state’ rather than “government” to emphasize the government’s independence from the rest of society… due to several factors; (1) its monopoly on the legitimate use of force within the country; (2) its unique role in defending the country from foreign rivals and (3) its regulatory and taxing powers.” With this in mind, the state essentially acts on its own interest when it involves stability and expansion. But, according to Christiansen, et al., (1994) “[there are] three [levels/] degrees of state autonomy: strong, medium and weak… [typically]strong state, societal-state preferences diverge; in the medium state, societal-state preferences initially diverge but become aligned after the state induces a change in societal preferences… in a weak autonomous state the policy preferences of society and the state are …show more content…
M. (2013), “While there are many theories of elite rule, they are [all] in agreement that elite rule is not necessarily oligarchical… but rather a regime sufficiently democratic to prevent elite domination and maintain popular legitimacy…elite democracy is a theory of representative government that seeks to reconcile centralized institutions with democratic principles.” Barker, D. M. (2013) goes on to say that a few key themes in an elite democracy which include, “a view of institutional systems as self regulating. That is… rather than an active citizenry, institutional systems are primarily responsible for providing for their own legitimacy and accountability…[and] free elections serve as meaningful democratic mechanism through which the citizenry can exercise influence over

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Hoai Thuong Thi Nguyen Professor Hans Klein PHIL 3127 December 11, 2015 PAPER #2 Plato, Herman And Chomsky About Democracy Leadership is very important in a country because it has the capacity to take it to the next level of success and even lead the people during times of war into fighting successful battles that ends in victory. The philosophers like Herman and Chomsky and Plato however had different views on how the people should be governed. The different types of governments are very important to be understood so that every person who wants to understand why his government is not functioning properly can do so through the lens of the philosophers. Herman and Chomsky states that there are reasons why the government of the day may resort…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Autonomy In DA

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When dealing with autonomy is generally centered base on management of prosecutorial, this enables the assistant district attorney to have the freedom to make his or her own decisions. In some DA’s office there typically written policies regarding cases. Attempting to control the supervision of the assistants tend to erode the morale of the office ( Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. 2014). However, this can help reduce a lot of mistakes from the assistant by reviewing all cases to ensure that policies are been followed this only makes the DA assistant more uncomfortable because they feel that they’re trusted.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kindred natives, excuse me, and enable me to ask, why am I called upon to talk here today? What have I or those I speak to do with your national autonomy? Are the considerable standards of political flexibility and of regular equity, exemplified in that Declaration of Independence, reached out to us? Also, am I, in this manner, called upon to convey our modest offering to the national holy place, and to admit the advantages, and offer sincere thanks for the endowments coming about because of your freedom to us? Would to God, both for your sakes and our own, that a positive answer could be honestly come back to these inquiries.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper Assignment Democracy is, obviously, one of the most commonly used concepts in modern society; but despite the frequent use, there is no universally agreed interpretation of the notion. The validity of this claim becomes particularly noticeable when comparing the interpretations of Thomas Jefferson and Carl Schmitt. This comparison is conducted with an aim to choose the most plausible approach to democracy which could be implemented in our contemporary U.S. society. It’s argued that although both Jefferson and Schmitt criticized their contemporaries for apathy in political participation, they suggested different ways through which Americans could contribute to building a democratic society.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many pieces written by philosophers in which they express their interest in different forms of government and politics. C. Wright Mills wrote about the model of the elite theory while Robert Dahl wrote about the pluralist model of American politics. The three best-known theories of American politics are the elite theory, pluralism, and hyperpluralism. Groups have been created to support each of the theories. America’s political process is best defined by the pluralist theory which represents various interest groups that compete and counterbalance one another.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is likewise genuine that the nearby government has a superior thought of what is required for their particular populace. The state government is huge and does not generally have a minuscule vision over the neighborhood states. In this way, at times the neighborhood government has part a bigger number of obligations than the state government. Having said that we have to recollect that the administration, be it nearby or government, is of the general population, by the general population, and all the more critically for the general population. I trust that the most vital part of state government is to keep up social request.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This led to conflicting views on the tasks and goals of political leaders as well as how dignified the polis was at running a republic by a democracy and or an oligarchy. They posed some very arguments. We will discuss those arguments and how they conflicted and which one had the more convincing argument. Let us describe what democracy and oligarchy are defined. In a democracy, “arises out of the notion that those who are equal in any respect are equal in all respects; because men are equally free.”…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Education and Democracy are entangled in American history and thought. Each one shapes the other. Plato mentions the cycle of cities and soul. The best city is the aristocracy, followed by a timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and tyranny. The type of souls to be found in the city are a philosopher, timocract, oligarchy, democrat, and a tyrant, respectively.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All governments are created to maintain a certain degree of order. Some governments allow each citizen an equal opportunity to participate in political outcomes. Other governments restrict the ability of citizens to have any influence over their nation’s rule. Both cases fall within the scale of government types: from oppressive regimes to anarchist factions. Although these types can differ dramatically, the same goal of all governments remains alike.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Je suis Je” or Let Me Be Myself: six thoughts for the elites of the 21st century to ponder about First time I heard about the elite theory in my class on Foreign Political Thought while doing my graduate studies in China. Even though Moska’s book “Elements of Political Science” had its drawbacks, it surprised me that I was introduced to this theory in China rather than in my, what I thought “far more democratic country”. It got me thinking about my country, the EU, the Northern America and other “far more democratic places”. Are they really so? Is my government any different from “authoritative” regimes of North Korea, Russia and other counties?…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to be a Sovereign State, in my opinion, there must be some sort of government. You must be able to have absolute control over all aspects of your country, and you must also provide adequate welfare for your citizens. If the welfare of your citizens becomes unsuitable, and you are no longer able to take care of them; or choose not to, then you are no longer a sovereign state. Also, there must be a defined sovereign territory for your state, we need to know where your state begins and ends. This ensures that you have the supreme power over your defined country, and nobody else can have authority over you.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction to Political Sociology Political sociology is a broad discipline and interrelated with several areas including sociology, political science, history and economics etc. It is basically the study of power and relationships between society, state, citizenships, political participation and their socio-political interactions. It has specifically focused on the questions about the nature of power, development of states, sources of political changes, idea of citizenship and notion of political participation. In this sense, the purpose of this paper is the analysis and explanation of certain aspects of the power, state, citizenship and political participation. Contemporary political sociology involves, but is not limited to, the study of these critical concepts and their interaction within the larger cultural context.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays