Common Law And Islamic Law

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… Civil law originated in the Roman Empire and extended to Europe (Glenn200, 119). When the empire declined so did its legal system. In the 11th to 13th centuries Rome revised the European system. The revision gave key legal codes that influenced Europe and other colonized territories (David and Brierley, 1985). Common law came from the British Isles following the military conquest of England from the Normans (Glenn 2000: Whincup, 1992). The Normans introduced the institution of jury and the absence of the written letter of the law. Common law is laws that are known widely but may not be written down just common sense laws. Stare decisis is an important feature that developed from common law. British colonies adopted the common law as the law of the land. Islamic law came about in the seventh century when Islam was born (Mourisi Badr 1978, 187). With the spread of Muslim religion so did Islamic law. It spread to the Central Asia and Middle East. Islamic law is based on religious principles of human conduct (Al-Azmeh 1988: Khadduri 1956: Lippman, McConville, and Yerushalmi, …show more content…
Stare decisis means the use of precedents when making legal decisions. This is found in common law system but not in civil and Islamic law systems (Opolot, 1980). Stare decisis allows judges to look back at past cases and make their judgment based on the outcome of the past case (Darbyshire, 2001). Stare decicis forms a precedent that is to be used from that moment forward (Opolot, 1980). In civil law system judges are not to look back at past cases to render their decisions. Civil law systems give their legislatures the power to make laws not to judges. Judges in this system makes their decisions based on legal codes, laws, and statues. Each case that a judge hears is treated as an individual incident without precedent. In the Islamic system the Qur’an, the Sunna, judicial consensus, and analogical reasoning are the basis for judges to make decisions (Vago, …show more content…
No matter what law system each country may abide by they should come together to decrease crimes around the globe. New policies should be made to help decrease globalization and stop the international crimes. If our countries ca not works together international crimes will continue to rise and justice will not be served.

References
.
Al-Azmeh, Aziz. 1988. Islamic Law: Social and Historical Contexts. New York, NY:
Darbyshire, Penny. 2001. Eddey and Darbyshire on the English Legal System, 7th edition.
London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Glenn, Patrick H. 2000. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Khadduri, Majid. 1956. “Islam and the Modern Law of Nations.” American Journal of
International Law, 50(2): 358-372.
Lippman, Matthew, Sean McConville, and Mordechai Yerushalmi. 1988. Islamic Criminal
Opolot, James S.E. 1980. An Analysis of World Legal Traditions. Jonesboro, TN: Pilgrimage
Press.
Powell, Emilia Justyna. 2006. “Conflict, Cooperation, and the Legal Systems of the World.”Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Define the following 25 legal terms: 1.HIPAA Privacy Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the privacy requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of HIPPA of 1996 and safeguard identifiable health information. ________________________ 2.HIPAA Security Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the security requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of the HIPPA 1996 ________________________ 3.Medical malpractice __A type of action in which the plaintiff must demonstrate that a physician-patient, nurse-patient, therapist-patient, or other healthcare provider-patient relationship existed at the time of the alleged wrongful act.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stare decisis is the principle that past decisions made by the judicial system are applied to similar issues within the jurisdiction. In the case Griswold V. Connecticut the initial ruling was over turned by the Supreme Court, finding that Connecticut’s Laws on birth control were unconstitutional. The defendants were initially charged with accessories in the assistance of preventing conception. The Supreme Court reversed this ruling because married couples have the right to privacy, in which, they have the right to seek medical assistance to prevent conception. Roe V. Wade’s reversal was built on the precedent of Griswold V. Connecticut’s rights of privacy.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Stare Decisis is a practice of deciding new cases with reference to former decisions, or precedents (Cross & Miller, 2015). This doctrine values the power of precedent and denotes that precedents established by a higher court are binding for all lower courts in the same jurisdiction. Judges need to follow these precedents and once courts has set forth principle of law as being applicable to a certain sets of facts, the principles must be applied in future cases concerning similar facts. (Cross & Miller, 2015).…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to support this idea, the history of the Australian legal system should be discussed. Australia is a common law country and the history of the Australian legal system stems from English common law system.2 Common law is judge made laws that are created based around areas that are not included. The judges are required to interpret legislation if there is a dispute about the meaning or how to apply an Act in a case. These interpretations then become part of the common law.3…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The laws modern society has in its legal system are more or less directly related to the moral principles of its people. Actions such as theft, murder and rape are unanimously immoral, which in turn makes the action illegal. However, some immoral actions do not have a legal counterpart, which could be due to a disagreement between two sides of an ethical dilemma. When this happens, legal action might occur in order for one side to transform their position on the matter into law. Sometimes these legal controversies can be so complex that it must keep going up the judicial system until the highest authority determines the absolute verdict.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Statute Law In Australia

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A verdict is rendered after the case is heard by a Judge. This verdict sets a precedent for all future similar cases; therefore common law is formed on the basis of previous judgments. There are some examples, negligence, torts, fiduciary duties and other equitable rights and contracts that come under common law jurisdiction. Common Law precedents can also result from interpretations of statute law. Common law can become statute law by the power of the day, (Parliament) turning a common law precedent into statutory…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been many influences on Canadian law including Hammurabi, Mosaic, and Roman. Britain has had the most influence on Canadian law. Although there have been many influences on Canada 's legal system, Britain has had the most impact for reasons such as Trial by Combat and Ordeal, Common Law, Rule of Law and the British North American Act of 1867. The impact that the Hammurabi laws have had on Canada 's legal system today is that the laws are known, along with the hierarchy of laws.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice community is always evolving, there are changes in technology that have caused shockwaves through the system that reach an international level. In the review of the current system, the impact of globalization on the United States criminal justice system will be assessed, as well as comparing and contrasting the international criminal justice systems. Which include Civil Law, Common Law, Islamic Law, and Socialist Law traditions. Additionally, the impact that cybercrime and technology have on the worldwide justice system, and the differences between the policing systems that exist throughout the world will be examined. Finally, the major crimes and criminal issues that have a global impact on the justice systems around the world will be appraised.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflicts as property is an initially perplexing notion. Published in a 1977 issue of The British Journal of Criminology, “Conflicts as Property” is an article criticising industrialised legal criminal systems and proposing a new, reformed system. Nils Christie suggests that conflicts are entities that are taken from their rightful owners. He later describes a hypothetical legal system where “professional thievery” of conflicts is nonexistent. By use of an analogy and several sub-ideas he deconstructs the concept.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Rosenau (1992) composed the first chapter of “Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics” in the aftermath of the Cold War. It was his argument that, rather than forming a world government to manage the world’s affairs, attentions should instead be focused on global governance. He also stressed that an increased level of governance would help propel the world towards a positive direction. The world faced an uncertain future following the end of the Cold War.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ratio Decidendi Essay

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages

    INTRODUCTION. It is an established common law principle that a decision by a superior court should be binding on inferior courts, hence, the ratio of past cases are legally binding on subsequent cases. This concept is called precedent and it is designed to give effect to the fact that the English law to some large extent is based on case law, and that case laws are not mere materials which a judge takes into consideration when making a decision on a particular case. Binding precedents are obtained from the legal reasoning for the decision of the court, which is called the ratio decidendi. Ratio Decidendi, as defined by Professor Cross, is; any rule of law expressly or impliedly treated by the judge as a necessary step in reaching his conclusion, having regard to the line of reasoning adopted by him, or a necessary part of his direction to the jury.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Religion And Law In Islam

    • 2137 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In today’s contemporary society religion and law are viewed as two distinct categories, which seem to never interconnect or even cross lines with one another. Religion is often regarded as a personal entity that has no effect on the community as a whole. This westernized view of religion is true to a certain extent— religion is a personal choice, but it is also a method of control. Religion, in this case, Islam, is crafted in such a way that satisfies the wellbeing of the individual, and along with the social and political structure of the society. Authority becomes rather firm and just when laws are derived from religion.…

    • 2137 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays