9. Draft a conclusion for the problem discussed in Exercise 7.
There are two different acts in the facts so the analysis will be done separately.
The first element that has to be proven against Mrs. Bill is that she trespasses the building with the purpose of committing a thief by force or deception in the first incident our client went to the Masonic temple after the fundraiser with the clear purpose of committing a thief and get into through deception.
The Statute indicates other circumstances in which a burglary become aggravated and at least one of four pointed must be present.
In our case, Mrs. Bill did not inflict or attempted to inflict physical harm to another, she didn’t use dangerous ordnance and the Masonic Temple is not …show more content…
Plaintiff claims that HRII and the London Hotel are both responsible for his injuries.
Issue Statement
Does a Business which licensed a trade name to other business may be liable for the acts of the entity to which they licensed even if that licensed business is outside the country under the federal rules?
Conclusion
According to the case law governing the case, Hospitality Resorts International Inc allowed Hospitality Resort In London holds itself as acting on behalf of the business, so Hospitality Resort International Inc may be liable for the injuries suffered by Mr. James Panhandle. CHAPTER 21
11. List of legally significant facts
Ms. Buyer wants to buy a lawn mower so she went to Movers R Us.
She did not know anything about these mowers so she asked to speak with the owner and told him she did not know anything about them and she wanted and expert. (where the seller at the time pf contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are …show more content…
(where the seller at the time pf contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are required)
Mr. Buyer brought and action against Mr.Merfchant and Mr. Facture.
14. List of errors
Statement A.
To say that the plaintiff is a single mother is not a legal significant fact
In the statement the facts that are mentioned only refers to the plaintiff 's allegation in her deposition, but don 't highlighted important facts included in the police report related to the previous incident with the other boy. It is an incomplete statement.
Statement B.
The first paragraph includes irrelevant information.
Important information is missing like the first mom 's impression, the contiditon of the defendant at the moment of the accident.
Statement
There are two different acts in the facts so the analysis will be done separately.
The first element that has to be proven against Mrs. Bill is that she trespasses the building with the purpose of committing a thief by force or deception in the first incident our client went to the Masonic temple after the fundraiser with the clear purpose of committing a thief and get into through deception.
The Statute indicates other circumstances in which a burglary become aggravated and at least one of four pointed must be present.
In our case, Mrs. Bill did not inflict or attempted to inflict physical harm to another, she didn’t use dangerous ordnance and the Masonic Temple is not …show more content…
Plaintiff claims that HRII and the London Hotel are both responsible for his injuries.
Issue Statement
Does a Business which licensed a trade name to other business may be liable for the acts of the entity to which they licensed even if that licensed business is outside the country under the federal rules?
Conclusion
According to the case law governing the case, Hospitality Resorts International Inc allowed Hospitality Resort In London holds itself as acting on behalf of the business, so Hospitality Resort International Inc may be liable for the injuries suffered by Mr. James Panhandle. CHAPTER 21
11. List of legally significant facts
Ms. Buyer wants to buy a lawn mower so she went to Movers R Us.
She did not know anything about these mowers so she asked to speak with the owner and told him she did not know anything about them and she wanted and expert. (where the seller at the time pf contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are …show more content…
(where the seller at the time pf contracting has reason to know any particular purpose for which the goods are required)
Mr. Buyer brought and action against Mr.Merfchant and Mr. Facture.
14. List of errors
Statement A.
To say that the plaintiff is a single mother is not a legal significant fact
In the statement the facts that are mentioned only refers to the plaintiff 's allegation in her deposition, but don 't highlighted important facts included in the police report related to the previous incident with the other boy. It is an incomplete statement.
Statement B.
The first paragraph includes irrelevant information.
Important information is missing like the first mom 's impression, the contiditon of the defendant at the moment of the accident.
Statement