Accordingly to the providential nature of the theogonical process, the development from one step of the process to another is not dictated by randomness, and even less it is the passage from mythology to revealed religion. Once more, let us borrow on Rowan Williams’ words, namely that the world always comes to us in symbols, and all we …show more content…
In Schelling’s own words, “in the child one cannot see the person that will be, Newton in the cradle did not show the creative spirit which will have given a different shape to math and astronomy [...] nonetheless what follows attests the meaning of what preceeds”. Thus, this means that the organic growth of A2 ends in the figure of Jesus, and that by looking back at the theogonical process we are able to track this development. Hence, we become able to see Dionysus and his manifestations at the same time as endowed with their own significance as well as steps to the manifestation of God as incarnated in Jesus