Karl Marx And Frederick Engels And The French Revolution

Improved Essays
In the late 1700s, the French revolution occurred because the French aristocracy and monarchy had oppressed the Third Estate: the peasants and commoners that were not part of the nobility or clergy. These French commoners declared their natural and political rights and overthrew the oppressive system of nobility in order to promote equality and create a government that would be more representative of the people. About fifty years after the French Revolution, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels were commissioned to write the Communist Manifesto, which similarly detailed a way that an oppressed working class would overthrow the exploitative bourgeoisie in order to promote equality and create a better government. The ideal Communist government Marx …show more content…
In the “Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen” it states, “Education is needed by all. Society ought to favor with all its power the advancement of the public reason and to put education at the door of every citizen.” Education is not only for the upper ruling class, but by educating all citizens the whole society will improve. Each citizen will be better able to diagnose and solve the problems society has when they are educated, and education will promote social mobility. Marx and Engels similarly note that education can promote political change by describing that the “bourgeoisie itself, therefore, supplies the proletariat with its own elements of political and general education, in other words, it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie.” The education of all people in a society is essential to progressing and the bourgeoisie must educate the proletariat in order to compete with other members of the bourgeoisie. In doing so, the proletariat is able to become more aware of the poor conditions the bourgeoisie has forced them into and that increases the restless spirit among them. Marx and Engels do not only view education as a way to achieve the revolution of the proletariat, but it is also necessary after the revolution. In listing the measures that will apply after communism has been established Marx and …show more content…
In the “What is the Third Estate?” Sieyes explains that a nation is “a body of associates, living under a common law, and represented by the same legislature.” Again, in the “Declaration of the Rights of Man”, the National Assembly, speaking as representatives for the French people, states “every citizen has a right to participate… through his representative.” After overthrowing the aristocracy, the French desire a type of representative government, like a republic, to be the new system of government. The system of government that Marx and Engels posit will form after the revolution of the proletariat is a strong central “state” that will control credit, communication, transport, and the instruments of production. Marx and Engels make no indication that the state will be representative of the people, but instead will attempt to establish equality by redistribution. The people will not participate in the central government as well, it will only be whoever makes up the state that will decide how the nation is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This very short essay, from the much longer “Critique of the Gotha Program,” highlights some of the key concepts of Marx’ ideas about the situation society would be in directly following the dissolution of capitalism. This is where the concepts of each according to his ability, to each according to his work, and “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” are formulated. These two concepts lay the foundation for the Marxist transition from capitalism, to a socialist society, and then culminate in the Marxist utopia of Communism. From a…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They viewed the capitalist development which had taken place in England, Belgium and to a certain extent France as revolutionary. It could destroy the old feudal societies which still dominated much of Europe and it could lead to major social and economic advances for the mass of humanity. This new order with its completely new ways of organizing production would come into conflict with the old. Marx and Engels saw revolutionary upheaval as an inevitable outcome of these clashes, especially in their native Germany, which was still made up of a large number of small states and principalities, although increasingly dominated by the militarized eastern state of…

    • 1503 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution there major problems were stirring in European society. These problems mostly involved the rankings in society between the middle class and the poor workers. These problems extended to the Netherlands on how the rich looked down at the poor. The ideas of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the authors of the Communist Manifesto, were exceptionally different from the ideas of Abraham Kuyper as seen in their religion or absence thereof, the audience to which they were speaking, as well as the time and setting in which they wrote their books. Marx and Kuyper both identified a noteworthy problem within the society they were living and tried to come up with a solution for it.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    History Final The Communist Manifesto The Communist Manifesto is a pamphlet written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and published on February 21, 1848. The Manifesto is a call to arms against capitalism and the bourgeoisie. They illustrate in simple terms so everyone can understand, that with the overthrow of unequal hierarchies of feudalism, came a split between classes because of capitalism.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx and Engle’s led me to believe that the Proletariat’s do the work while the Bourgeoisie regulate their income and working environments. Bourgeoisie live in wealth and strive to live in a “classless society”. A classless society according to the Bourgeoisie was one with government controlled wages, benefits, and no private ownership. The relationship they share is a give and take type relationship. The proletariat’s gave while the Bourgeoisie’s took.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, the Communists have come together to write the Communist Manifesto, so that their thoughts and theories can be published for the public. The first section of the Communist Manifesto introduces many important ideas. One of the main topics in this sections is Marx’s thoughts…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engels and Marx believed that the fight between the classes is the base for all history and social conflicts. The wealthy class, known as the bourgeoisie, were those who owned the factories and the means of production. Marx and Engels believed that the bourgeoisie made their money off of their employees, the working class, what they termed as the proletariat. The rich got richer while the poor got poorer. The Communist Manifesto also stated that the working class will rebel against the rich to take the wealth the they deserve.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx on the other hand, believed in the notion of class struggle. He believed that “political power is merely the organised power of one class for oppressing another.” Following a Proletariat Revolution, the proletariat would organize a temporary government and would employ ten measures which included the abolition of private property and free education for all. Once such programs resolved class disparities, the power of the proletariat would no longer be political as there would no longer be any…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Historical Analysis The industrial revolution was important time for the world. During this time, you will see four things that will increase super quickly and them four are wealth, industry, population, and political influence (Owens,164). Also, you will see factories and other plants have terrible work conditions according to Sadler Committee. She they will interview people that worked in factories and describe the working conditions.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism, in simpler terms, revolves around the system where people who have control over means of production like factories, machines and raw materials hire workers to work for them, providing them with wages for their work. The main idea is to generate profit from the work produced and the relationship between those who control the means of production and the workers. How class exist? In Marx and Engel’s Manifesto of the Communist Party, it was mentioned that “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” proclaiming that how society is being changed and shaped is being driven by the class struggles that has always existed from the earlier history of ancient Rome to Middle Ages to the contemporary society.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays