Derivations To Kant's Categorical Imperative

Superior Essays
Kantian Ethics is revolved around universal laws, as people apply moral laws to many situations and circumstances daily. Moral obligation is binding for all rational beings, in all places and at all times. Thus, it is important to develop a clear understanding of moral principles as it helps people keep track of their moral obligation and ensure that their motivations are pure; not self-interested. A secure understanding of morality must be based on the a priori concepts of reason that are from pure philosophy because a priori concepts occur to people before they have any sensory perception. As a result, “pure”, a priori concepts give intrinsic validity to universally valid moral ideas. In addition, morality based on reason not only is logical to everyone but also superior to a moral system accepted by one specific community. Reason is a source of fundamental truths that transcend culture and history. This is due to the fact that rational ideas make sense to everyone, it is universal and it has a strong claim to authority. Overall, this essay will cover the derivations to Kant’s Categorical Imperative, what is good will …show more content…
When rational beings pursue their objectives, they must always view themselves not only as means to some purpose but also ends in themselves. In addition, rational beings must also treat their peers as ends in themselves. Hence, the second formulation of categorical imperative is as follows: “Act so that you use humanity as much in your own person as in the person of every other, always at the same time as end and never merely as means.” . Kant’s example of helping others in need is consistent with the second formulation of the law. A view of humanity as end in itself requires people to strive towards maximum happiness for humanity, thus people must take care of other people for the welfare of the humanity. This formulation is still universal, applicable to everyone and comes from reason; not from

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s, “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals”, the morality of action is questioned, defined, and explained. To do so, Kant brings up an example of several people, two of which either, “preserve their lives”, or, “act charitably” out of pure, “natural inclination” (Kant). The other two are performing the same actions, but, in stark contrast to the other two individuals, are acting because of a, “motive of duty”, or maxim (Kant). Kant explains that those who acted out of duty are only deserving of moral status for their actions, and those who acted out of impulse do not. After much deliberation, I have agreed with Kant’s perspective of what comprises a moral action.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s basis for “Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals” is an objective view into how and why decisions are made among rational beings for the furtherance of their and society’s wellbeing. Through his view in the 1700’s we can see how much of a scientific stance Kant took in journalizing his analyzation of his own and society’s morals. Kant lists five “formulations” that are involved in rational decision-making. Rational beings have utilized the “Categorical Imperative” to shape today’s society by way of relationships and treatises. These formulations give rational beings an expanded view of the many faces of the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through this paper it will be clear that morality is crucial to our successful function on this earth as it is ration and helps us achieve our ultimate goal. One needs to be moral to achieve happiness, by following utilitarianism, Aristotle and ethics and the human emotion of guilt. It should also be noted that acting morally is the only rational option, this can be proved by Immanuel Kant, Plato’s the Republic and the Moral Sense Theory. The ultimate goal…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant an 18th century German philosopher considered rather notable for his work in ethical philosophy. Kant was responsible for the book Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morality and his work remains relevant today as a crucial ‘part of Western Moral Philosophy’. Kant argues that reason is what predisposes what is right. Kant believed that religion should not be taken into consideration when determining what is morally right. Kant’s reasoning of this is explained that if one only gaged what is right based on religion this would not result in a ‘supreme principle of morality’ for all people.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second formula of Kant’s Categorical Imperative illustrates that to be a moral it is necessary to treat every human being as an end, never as means. Regarding the sexual relationship of the human being, if someone does not seek her partner’s consent to be engaged in sex, he then humiliates his partner by considering her merely as means. In fact, his behavior is equivalent to a rapist because none of them get consent from the opposite, therefore is immoral. But, this sort of philosophical thinking does not go hand in hand with the religious thinking. Hence, I would like to discuss that Islam, one of the major religions on the planet, seems to be reluctant about the consent of women at the time of intercourse.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Paper—Argument against Irrationality of Immorality Introduction: In this paper, I will first define the Kantian moral theory. Secondly, I will explain the opposition argument in detail; for a better understanding of Kant’s reasoning. Next, I will explain my disagreement against premise three in Kantian’s argument for the irrationality of immorality that states, “If you obey the principle of universalizability, then you act morally” (Shafer-Landau). Finally, I will close with my overall view on the subject matter.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The fundamental idea that Kant introduces in the second half of Chapter 2 is that rational beings are "ends in themselves. " When you settle on a course of action, Kant notes, you do not think of yourself as a means to some other purpose; you think of yourself as the purpose or "end" to which all your actions are directed. If you expect other people to accept your motives, you must respect the fact that other people also think of themselves as more than mere means to other goals. Thus your motives will lack universal validity unless you respect the fact that all rational beings have intrinsic worth, just as you do. The categorical imperative requires you to treat all your fellows as "ends in themselves"--that is, as objects of intrinsic value--and…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, giving money to a homeless person just to get him/her to leave you alone would be judged not moral by Kant because it was done for the wrong reason. With Kants belief in mind; if the consequence of immoral behavior were dealt with in a legal structure, people would be prosecuted for "EVERYTHING" since there are no extenuating circumstances. Kant's categorical imperative is a tri-dynamic statement of philosophical thought:(1) " So act that the maxim of you could always hold at the same time as a principle establishing universal law. "(2) "Act so as to treat humanity, whether in your own person in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays