Just War Theory: The Principles Of Just War Theory

Great Essays
Today, technological advances in warfare have challenged the foundational principles of Just War Theory and generated scrutiny around ethical behavior in combatant environments. Just War Theory refers to a set of rules that a sovereign state is expected to follow before engaging in war, during war, and after war—jus ad bellum, jus in bellum, and jus post bellum, respectively. With the increased employment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) or drone strikes under the Obama Administration, one may doubt the morality of these attacks. Specifically, the aims of this essay seek to answer the question on whether or not drone strikes in Yemen adhere to the principles of Just War Theory. Considering the unprecedented and regular use of this technology, …show more content…
Just cause is the principle that a state should only approve war in the act of self-defense against the aggressor who is always at fault (Orend 17). Drone strikes in Yemen violate this principle because just cause condemns preemptive strikes. Furthermore, an act of self-defense only qualifies when the self-defense is in response to a current attack, not a suspected attack in the future (Orend 17). Because drone strikes are used to prevent Al Qaeda’s potential, future attacks on the United States, they may seem perfectly justified; however, considering that the United States has not suffered a domestic attack on the scale of the September 11 attacks since 2001, drone strikes violate this central rule of Just War …show more content…
Last resort explains that leaders should not pursue war until exhausting all diplomatic negotiation efforts (Orend 59). The violation of Just War Theory is less clear as it relates to drone strikes in Yemen, since negotiation efforts with Yemen are complicated through an absence of a United States embassy in the country (CNN). However, because the United States does not actively negotiate or have strong ties to the Yemeni government, their use of drone attacks is that much more unethical. Without supporting a dialogue between itself and the Yemeni government, the United States does not have the ethical right to employ drone strikes. In this scenario, the United States is the aggressor because the nation has taken upon itself to initiate a war without considering it as a last resort. Additionally, one may argue that the last resort may be ignored in this scenario because the war on terrorism has no known negotiator on the side of the terrorists. However, when examining the principle of just cause, it does not make sense to initiate a dialogue with a terrorist organization because they have not explicitly given the United States grounds to pursue war since the September 11 attacks. Ultimately, the last resort exposes a weakness in the United States’ drone enforcement policy in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    You live in Syria, your hometown is taken over by terrorists. As if the terroristic violence is enough, you constantly hear the roar of drones invading the skies. At work with your co-workers and at home with your families, every second of the day you ponder upon the question, “Am I next?”. Target drone strikes create even more unnecessary fear in neighborhoods taken over by terrorists. We should stop trying to end terrorism with lethal force such as drone strikes.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The US is conducting secondary strikes after the initial strike to kill other possible target, this has discouraged help of innocent victims, and even inhibited emergency services and humanitarian workers from providing medical care and relief, this can be considered as war crimes [6][9][15], a view voice by UN’s Christof Heyns [8]. Laws are the underpinning of duty-based ethics, as it is set up as a general rule for everyone to uphold, since the US is an UN member therefore it acknowledges this general rule and to break it is unquestionably unethical. Ben Emmerson QC from the UN states that in each case of civilian casualties, there needs to be a full explanation made to the public, this obligation ought to be viewed as an inherent part of the State’s legal obligations of accountability under international humanitarian law and international human rights law [8]. In the case of US very little explanation is given for each civilian casualty, this demonstrates disregard of two other international law by the US when is comes to drones strikes, again this shows unethical from duty based point. The precedent the US is setting is not just duty-based unethical, from a consequentialist point, the lost of respect for international law can lead to a other nations not obligating international standards of rules of engagement, thus human atrocity can be committed.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drones In The Civil War

    • 2693 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Nick Mariano Dr. Mark Wilson ETH 2050 24 November 2014 Game of Drones In the Civil War, Confederate generals like Robert E. Lee dismissed guerilla warfare as dishonorable and immoral. It was akin to shooting a man in the back, they said. Today, guerilla warfare forms the foundation of modern military strategy.…

    • 2693 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone Strikes

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under international humanitarian law, the targeted persons must be directly playing a part in hostilities with the United States. Furthermore, the targeted persons must also pose an imminent threat that only lethal force can prevent (“Living Under Drones”). Simply being assumed to have a connection with a "militant" organization or under the United States policy of "signature" drone strikes is not legally appropriate to make someone a acceptable target for killing. Moreover, the United Nations ' Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism, Human Rights Chief, and Special Rapporteur on summary, arbitrary, or extrajudicial executions have all labeled US drone strikes as a violation of sovereignty, and have pressed for investigations into the legality of the…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a stark contrast to the Vietnam War, which ultimately gives way to an agreement that although lives were lost in the Iraq War it was far more successful in the a number of soldiers surviving. “Between 1 January 1961 and 31 December 1972 there were 56,838 deaths among military personnel in Vietnam and a total of 2,608,650 person-years of exposure” (Buzzell 2007, 557) this gives way to the death rate being almost 22% per thousand which in turn ends up being about 5.5 times hirer than that of the Iraq War. There are attributes that give way to the Iraq War being one with fewer casualties given the advancement in war tactics and the ability to evacuate areas much quicker than before giving severely…

    • 1602 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide safety for Americans against al-Qaeda. Rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the country, the use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals ethical? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem unmoral. Kenneth Anderson, however, provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective with his tone, organization, use of quotes, and appeal to logic in his article, “The Case for Drones.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just War theory gets more complicated when our enemy is a non-state actor such as ISIS. It is my belief that Just War theory needs to be revised or rethought to better understand its application in this context. The Jus ad Bellum if viewed through a traditional state entity prism may prove difficult to satisfy. I am referring to checkpoints such as right authority, proportional response, retaliatory versus preemptive strike, etc.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem with this is that this idea died out around George W. Bush's first term as president, but we have been fed the same thing and everyone knows why we are there. Supporters of drone warfare are humbled by the fact that a terrorist target has been taken out with no American casualties besides maybe a piece of equipment. When critics see the same thing happen, they begin to question where to draw the line. The issue is that the line has been drawn already, but organizations such as the C.I.A. Are willing and are able to cross that line and getting away with it because they are able to justify sending a hellfire missile into Middle Eastern territory. When agent orange was introduced into Vietnam, military personal were delivering massive amounts of it upon the native jungle regions of Vietnam, Eastern Laos, and parts of Cambodia.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Just or unjust? Al-Qaeda’s ideology and actions have proven to be unjust, violating just war theory, basic human rights, and plain old human decency. In this paper, I will explain how and why Al-Qaeda’s ideology and tactics violate the Just War Theory, as well as a counterpoint to this. Al-Qaeda which means “The Base” was created by Osama Bin Laden along with the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which was led by Ayman al-Zawahiri in the early 1980's in order to push the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan. In the early part of the 1980’s, 1979 to 1989 to be exact, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, it was also during this time that the U.S. was involved in the “Cold War with the Soviet Union.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of such strikes to eliminate targets that pose credible current and future threats to the lives of the American people warrants such a violent response. Nevertheless, a major criticism – one which Hayden highlights in his article – which is laid against the use of the drone program is the uncertainty of the targets and the inability of the strike to be 100% precise. Hayden reveals that “…other attacks were intended to disrupt known Qaeda locations and activities even when the identities of the people present were not known.” (Hayden, 2016). Hayden sheds more light to this by identifying two scenarios in which civilian casualties were recorded due this imprecision; however, I argue that this is largely underestimated.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first “armed” drones were built to capture and kill Osama bin Laden. Drones are mainly manufactured in USA and Israel. The first recorded use of attack drones occurred on July 15, 1849 when the Habsburg Austrian Empire launched 200 pilotless balloons armed with bombs against the revolution-minded citizens of Venice. According to a July 18, 2013 survey, 61% of Americans supported drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. Support spanned the political divide, including Republicans (69%), independents (60%), and Democrats (59%).…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What do drones and military trained soldiers have in common? One has to bear the burden of killing one single innocent while the other powers down after an entire year of killing innocents with no ounce of remorse, guess which ones which. Over the decade, an estimation of over 400 innocent lives have been taken by American drones. It is safe to say anytime an innocent is killed a mob short tempers will want someone to pay. Because of the use of drone technology in warfare, countless people have raised the question of whether or not the use of drones is ethical or not.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the amount of drone strikes conducted, many questions whether if those strikes really satisfy the requirement of the international law…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aggressive Drone Warfare

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drone Warfare: The United States and their Aggressive Drone Policy in Afghanistan The United States has shifted its military strategies for taking out foreign enemies by reducing the number of boots they put on the ground and increasing the use of unmanned aerial vehicles referred to as drones. The use of drones is effective at sparing the number of U.S. soldiers and pilots being sent to deal with terrorist organizations (Grayson 2016). However it is ineffective in reducing the number of civilians that are killed or wounded through the use of these counterinsurgency strategies (Khalili 2012). This essay argues that the current U.S. drone policy in the country of Afghanistan is too aggressive and is doing more harm than good.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eye in the Sky, directed by Gavin Hood, is a compelling polemic film highlighting the moral challenges of drone warfare. It follows a mission to capture terrorists in Kenya, involving characters such as; Colonel Katherine Powell, a military officer; Frank Benson, deputy chair of defence staff and Alia, a Kenyan child. This film highlights that although drone warfare is impersonal and can embroil innocent civilians in its trajectory, it is necessary to combat terrorism. In order to substantiate this invited reading, this essay will explore the disconnection between drone warfare and humanity, the impacts of drone warfare on innocent lives and finally, how drone warfare is nevertheless a necessary measure. This essay seeks to analyse how, and…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays