Just War Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
Imagine that you are having a completely normal night at home. You have just eaten dinner, and now you are sitting on the couch watching TV with your family. Then, out of nowhere, someone storms into your house waving a gun around and threatening to kill your family. What do you do? Do you grab a gun, or if you do not have one, do you storm the intruder and try to stop him from hurting your family? Or, do you just stand in front of him and risk getting you and the rest of your family killed? Some, especially pacifists, might say that if you are a Christian, you must NOT fight back. They justify their argument by using verses such as Luke 6:27, Matthew 5:44, and Romans 12:19, but pacifists take these verses out of context. There are numerous …show more content…
Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 says, “There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the heavens: a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot, a time to kill and a time to heal, a time to tear down and a time to build, a time to weep and a time to laugh, a time to mourn and a time to dance, a time to scatter stones and a time to gather them, a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing, a time to search and a time to give up, a time to keep and a time to throw away, a time to tear and a time to mend, a time to be silent and a time to speak, a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace.” This verse clearly states that there is a time for everything, even war and killing. For war and violence to be just for a Christian, though, depends on their intentions and the circumstance. The only reason a Christian should ever fight back is if they are using it as protection or defense, whether it is for themselves, others, or even their country. There are multiple examples in scripture of Christians fighting to defend themselves in war. Nehemiah 4:14 says, “After I looked things over, I stood up and said to the nobles, the officials and the rest of the people, ‘Don’t be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your …show more content…
In other words, peace in this world cannot be achieved without force. For example, policemen, soldiers, and others must fight in order to defend their fellow citizens and their country against unjust violence. What would we do without these brave men and women? If all Christians were pacifists, then there would be an enormous amount of death and destruction everywhere, because there would be no one protecting the innocent. A study was taken in 2008 that proved that 77% of soldiers are Christians! Without them, there would be no army to battle the evil of this world! Also, God is a God of justice. There are many examples of Him using force in the Bible to achieve justice! Christians can be in law enforcement, the military, and can fight, as long as they are seeking justice, just as they believe God

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Inca Empire Dbq

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Fighting was not the original idea, but "holy war" was justified…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People declare that King Arthur’s knights are the most “mighty and most worthy of all mortal men” (42). As King Arthur’s knights, they are expected to be strong and brave since they have a certain standard to live up to from King Arthur--that is how they are expected to act. This is similar to the Christian faith. As Christians, we have a difficult task of showing continual forgiveness and love and faithfulness and righteousness, but that is expected of us. People have a certain expectation when viewing Christians since Christ is our greatest example.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq 19 World War 1 Essay

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    •nationalistic desire to defend their mother country Britain. Some Canadians thought the war would be over by christmas and many thought it was a extensive way to escape financial issues. Many men were influenced by others joining •At first Families thought the war would on last a couple of months •Families were unwilling to send more young men out to war, knowing that they may not return or how much longer the battle would continue •Canadians thought they had already contributed enough food, supplies , men and money to the war. But some thought that it was their patriotic duty to help serve their country.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Non-violence works as a strategy to bring about change because it is morally and strategically superior to any other strategy, and because it works for changes that will benefit all people. Non-violence, as a morally and strategically superior method to bring about change is first seen in Document 1. Document 1 is a letter from Mohandas Gandhi to the English governor in India where Gandhi explains why he plans to use non-violence and how doing so will make British recognize the “wrong they have done to India,” (Doc 1/ Letter to Irwin). Also in the document, Gandhi points out that the physical harming of a peaceful entity violates the morals of nearly every civilization around the Globe. This means that by using non-violence, Gandhi’s movement is morally superior to his opposition, which put the morals and reputation of the opposition into play, coaxing the other side to comply with Gandhi’s requests.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Walter Wink’s article “Beyond Just War and Pacifism” he does not believe war should ever be justified. He gave a helpful understanding for the complexity and opacity of human violence. In a broader view Wink sees a hidden dimension not apart from physical reality and human society but grounded within the social world. Wink calls this hidden reality “The domain of the Powers”. Wink argues that war can never be just because justice requires fairness on both sides and war there could never be that.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Would it not be great to be able to prevent conflict altogether? Not having to resolve any disputes, or differences, and having complete harmony. It would be amazing; however, conflict is part of life. We may not be able to prevent it all the time, but we can be prepared to resolve it in the best manner possible. Authors, Ken Sande and Kevin Johnson, share their knowledge in their book titled, Resolving everyday conflict, providing a Christian view on conflict resolution (Sande & Johnson, 2011).…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of Warfare in Religion Throughout history, the attitudes that Christianity, Hinduism, and Islam have had towards war have changed, and have affected each religion 's development throughout history. The study of warfare in the context of religion is important, because the ability of the three largest religions to survive to the modern day is only partly due to their religious messages. Rather, in times of conflict, religious warfare protected the foundations and peoples of each religion, while also allowing for immense growth and expansion occurred. As a result, teachings about conflict are abundant and can be found within the holy books of Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism alike.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peasants’ War was a time of violence and rebellion; there is no question about that. But who can be seen as responsible for instilling the use of force as a solution for the injustice by the Church and lords? Arguably the two largest leaders in the Peasants’ War and the German Reformation were Martin Luther and Thomas Müntzer. Although they both wanted to fix injustices, they used very different forms of rhetoric to do so. Martin Luther’s writings condemned violence and asked rebels to trust in God rather than force.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "My religion is based on truth and non-violence. Truth is my God. Non-violence is the means of realizing Him," said Mahatma Gandhi, one of the greatest revolutionary leaders in history. Though some people, like Malcolm X, during the Civil Rights movement did not agree with non-violence, non-violence is always the smartest and safest way of protesting. This is what Robert Kennedy wanted to teach the people with his speech on the day Martin Luther King Jr. died: that violence does not lead anywhere good and that destruction, separation, and chaos are not the way to proceed.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the short story," The Lottery", it shows a fictional tradition where they, at the end, stone a member of a family. Even though this is injuring and killing a citizen or a whole family, they still continue it. It's tradition. Why would you stop? I do believe that if something is morally wrong, it should be stopped.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Violence Unending Cycle

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Violence creates death, which leads to revenge, then back to violence. It’s an unending cycle of chaos that needs to be solved. Violence is all around us, in poverty stricken parts of Chicago, in cities all around the world, even in stories like Hamlet. But how does this unending cycle determine one’s control over their fate? With all these places that violence erupts from all have one thing in common.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There appears to be two different ways of looking at the above statement. It can be argued that World War II was a continuation of World War I. Or, it could also be argued that World War II was not a continuation, but that World War I merely "set the stage" for World War II. After much consideration, there really is a fine line between these two situations. As there were many ways in which World War I actually led to World War II, this argument will take the position that "World War II was a continuation of World War I". In fact, it could be claimed that World War II was actually "Act II" of the Great War.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, through the apostle Paul, God instructs believers to turn away from vengeance: “Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good” (Romans 12:19-21, King James…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Think about it this way , war is not justifiable . Would you stand by and watch while your family and country are being attacked by a formidable force to bodily and deadly harm ? Or would you fight back ? How could you fight back ? War is not justifiable to remember .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Is Never Good Essay

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    War is Never Good War is a destruction which can be performed with weapons or without weapons. It is caused by several reasons such as inequality and religion. War has never contributed in creating something; it always advocates disaster. War is itself an evil and is on the top of many kinds of evil like unemployment, illness, poverty, illiteracy and instability. Conflict has never done well to anyone.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics