Andrew Jackson's Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
The peace between the Native Americans and the Europeans settlers did not last very long due to years of mistrust and fighting for control of land both laid claim to. Tensions reached a boiling point during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson became a leading advocate for the removal of Native Americans from their lands. In his first and second annual address to Congress, Andrew Jackson presented his controversial stance on forcing the Native Americans out of United States territory. His argument gained some support, but was met with criticism from those siding against his policy. Both sides offered their legal and moral arguments on the subject of Indian removal, but those against the policy made the better argument. Andrew Jackson …show more content…
He asked Congress to consider setting aside lands west of the Mississippi River for the Native American to use as they wish. It was there, Jackson asserted, the Native Americans “may be secured in the enjoyment of governments of their own choice, subject to no other control from the United States.” It also seemed like Jackson did not want to make this change forcefully and made it appear as if the Native Americans could eventually become more civilized on the other side of the Mississippi. However, Jackson made it clear that if the Native Americans did intend to live inside United States territory; they must adhere to the states’ …show more content…
The Cherokee Nation also had their chance to voice their stance to Congress. They initially asked why it has come to the idea of removing them to another location they are unfamiliar with. The Cherokees believed they initiated no treaty with the United States to relinquish the rights to their lands. Finally, they insisted if their interpretations of treaties made with the United States are incorrect; then they were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He gave the Indian tribes a message of peace as if he didn’t want to do anything against them, showing the peace between him and the Indian Tribes. Also in his Second Annual Message to Congress he stated "Toward the aborigines of the country no one can indulge a more friendly feeling than myself, or would go further in attempting to reclaim them from their wandering habits and make them a happy, prosperous people." By doing so, he conveyed that he had no intentions of harming the tribes and wanted to show his good intentions to them. By this time, the Indian Removal Act was slowly coming to a decision of being accepted or not, and even though he had been planning the removal, Jackson reassured the Indian tribes that it was to help rather than harm them, though in reality he was actually harming. For many years, the Indian tribes had lived on the American lands with their belief that the land didn’t belong to a single person but to everyone.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But this was ignored and whites continued to move into Indian Territory. It is reported that U.S president Andrew Jackson responded by saying “Well John Marshall his decision. Now let him enforce it!” Andrew Jackson did nothing to help the Indians or make things better for them. He believed the best thing for them was to move them…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson believed that the Native Americans were in the way of advancement to the American society and that they simply can’t survive in white society. Certain laws and treaties were enforced but necessarily not followed. The 1802 Indian Trade and Intercourse Act had provided that no land cessions could be made except by treaty with a tribe, and that federal rather than state law would operate in Indian Territory. In 1832, after the Supreme Court ruled that states couldn’t legally extend their jurisdiction into Indian Territory, Jackson refuses to enforce the Court’s decision. He was actively working on and in favor of Indian removal.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cherokee people lived all over the land before the United States even existed. “The Cherokees lived on land extending from North Carolina to South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama for hundreds of years” (Green & Perdue, 1). They were constantly moving around involuntarily. The Cherokee tribes were often forced to leave their land when Americans found use of the land that the Cherokees were living on. White Americans were wanting their land because they found gold, wanted their livestock and they were able to evict the Cherokees out of their homes” (Green & Perdue, 92)…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curtis explains that initially Jackson had no quarrel with the Native Americans because they never had harmed anyone in his family, but tensions between them and other westerners influenced his views (22). As Jackson grew older his words on Native Americans grew harsher and showed how he hated them for their disorder. Later when Jackson was a military man, he took to slaughtering so many Native Americans. He did this to the Creeks who had sided with the British and attacked Fort Mims in 1813 (Curtis 49). Yet during his presidency, when tensions with the United States and the Native Americans were high, Jackson said that “Indians are subjects of the United Stated” (Curtis 71).…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After reading the text provided I came to the conclusion that the relationship between the Native Americans and the United States was in constant turmoil. The text is littered with many treaties made with the Natives and the effect these had on all parties involved. The westward expansion caused numerous battles and debates among the politicians and tribes. A quote from the article A Shawnee Argues for an Untied Indian Resistance, 1810 states “After mistreatment of the Native Americans by Presidents Jefferson and Madison, Tecumseh, a Shawnee, tried to organize the Midwestern Indian tribes into a united political alliance to thwart the steady advance of the white settlers.” This quote shows the strained relationship between the Natives and the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson accepted the help of friendly native Americans and the Cherokee Regiment which included John Ross, “…and from the moment he enrolled, his destiny and Jackson’s were linked”, (Inskeep, 5). Jackson and Ross’s relationship evolved with many disagreements of their actions. Especially when Andrew Jackson and John Ross would start as friends and partners during the beginning of their alliance but Andrew ended up betraying Ross in the end due to his presidency power and his desperation to grow and expand the United Sates. Ross disagreed with Jackson throughout the years of the removal debate, the Trail of Tears trek from the Cherokee Homelands, and the rebuilding of the nation. Andrew Jackson left a big imprint upon America, he is best known for being the author of the Indian Removal act of 1830.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Louisiana Purchase Dbq

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many Americans who wanted to push the Indians off viewed them as inferior and did not take interest on their lives. Andrew Jackson was a forceful proponent of Indian removal that had a paternalistic view on the Indians. President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act which authorized him to give unsettled land to the Native Americans in exchange for their lands in existing state borders. These unsettled lands were called Indian Reservations where Indian tribes such as the Cherokee, Seminoles, Creek, and Choctaw had to take long treacherous routes to reach. (Doc. D)…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A cherokee Indian from the “Memorial of the Cherokee Nation,” describes the western land as badly supplied with food and water, unfamiliar cultures, and “wish to die” on this soil (Doc. K). Jackson forced the Indians to surrender their land and failed to provide any support in terms of food and other necessities for their westward migration. Because of the Indian’s utmost disenchantment, it is possible that they took their case to the Supreme Court. However, Jackson could have ignored that decision since he already had a majority vote in Congress to be condemned and impeached. Conjointly, Native Americans were gathered into similar places in the west.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest developments of the 19th century was the Industrial Revolution, as it paved the way for a new way of living in America. New forms of technology and transportation contributed to the increased expansion from the established eastern cities to the western frontier. Although this expansion created many new possibilities, there was still people who felt expansion was detrimental to the nation. Between 1800 and 1855, supporters and opponents of territorial expansion influenced federal government policy by urging the government to act, or not to, on expansion debate that would affect the future of the nation. During the 1800’s, America was ready to expand but the French held control of New Orleans and the Louisiana territory,…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He commented "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation” (Library of Congress, Jackson, 1830). At that time however only two tribes agreed to leave their land, the others were not in agreement with the Indian Removal Act. In response, the American Indians fought back on a political level, Chief John Ross who represented the majority of the American Indians who did not want to leave their lands tried to diplomatically and legally maintain autonomy with the United States…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was said that President Andrew Jackson was looking in the best interest of U.S. citizens and moved the indians to help keep from conflicts that could possibly lead to war from arising yet again between the United States and the Native Americans or that some Native tribes were just too violent and were seen as a threat by U.S. citizens. It seemed like Americans and Native Americans could not blend and live together peacefully and that is also a said reason why the Trail of Tears…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays