What Is Nietzsche's Argument Against Religion

Improved Essays
1. Between Ivan Karamazov and Nietzsche, I think that Nietzsche makes the stronger argument against religious faith. Nietzsche, in Section 2 of the Antichrist, begins by condemning Christianity by saying “Active pity for all the failures and all the weak: Christianity.” Christianity gives people hope for the failures and weaknesses by letting them slide. It doesn’t teach them that they should grow stronger from their mistakes. Instead, it tells them that failing is okay because they tried and didn’t succeed. This is understandable but it shouldn’t be something that people continue to follow. Nietzsche believes that “Christianity should not be beautified and embellished: it has waged a deadly war against this higher type of man…the reprobate …show more content…
In The Antichrist, Nietzsche exclaims that when humans feel anxiety and scared, they immediately offer away their power to people who aren’t worthy and reliable enough and who will use the power other’s give them to make their own status/power even greater. Nietzsche, specifically, makes this argument when it comes to priests. To him, priests “hold all great concepts in his hand; he plays them out with benevolent contempt…horrors or vices” (Sec 8, 575). Priests try to make us believe that they know the truth and how we should live. They want us to believe that they know how we should live and what is right and wrong. People give into this fact and allow priests to see that it’s what gives them power and meaning. Nietzsche knew that if people kept giving in, priests would continue to feed off the power that the people give them. Nietzsche believes as well that “As long as the priest is considered a higher type of man—this professional negator, slanderer, and poisoner of life—there is no answer to the question: what is truth?” (Sec 8, 575). If we continue to give into the belief that priests hold what is the truth and what is a lie, then they have won. This is what gives them their power. We allow them to forgive our “sins” or wrongdoings because they declare what is a wrongful action or what is a righteous action. Comparing this to American culture today, Nietzsche is completely correct. We feed our power to these “figureheads” like the Kardashians and politicians like Hillary Clinton or Trump. Specifically, society looks up to Kim Kardashian and her life because of a sex-tape she made which made Kim famous. From that, it gave her publicity and fortune which should have never been grown out of something like that. But, society has given her this ability to enhance her life and she could care less about anyone else but herself and her family, in the end. Even, Hillary Clinton and Trump have their own intentions in mind and could generally care less what the people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I want to start off by saying that Friedrich Nietzsche was one of the more complicated philosophers that I ever had pleasure of studying. What I took away from Friedrich Nietzsche opinions on the death of God is that he was referring to the declining belief and respect for God or religion in general. Nietzsche felt that with the loss of religion the west would lose its distinctive cultural identity. Friedrich Nietzsche was not a big fan of Christianity to say the least, but he still understood its importance and its benefits to the culture. Friedrich Nietzsche, in my humble opinion had a strange outlook on morality.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche believed in the concept of infinity in more ways than just infinity’s existence. He seemed to suggest a living person’s life was not the only one lived by that person’s self; an individual’s life was the recurrence of his/her own self from a previous life ad infinitum. In this way, Nietzsche provided arguments against the prevalent Christian beliefs on the origin of the earth. One method he used, was utilizing ever evolving scientific theory as foundations and premises for his arguments against Christian teachings about the creation of the earth. Additionally, he used this method in an attempt to counter what he considered was the ultimate technique of slavery Christianity instilled upon mankind: its mortality.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He states “History shows that the consciousness of being in debt to the deity did not by any means come to an end together with the organization of communities on the basis of blood relationship. Even as mankind inherited the concepts ‘good and bad’ from the tribal nobility, it also inherited, along with the tribal and family divinities” (Nietzsche, 90). This also relates to the will to power. Hypothetically speaking these people who a debt can only take so much punishment from the person of credit before them rise up as a whole to end their suffering at the hand of the creditor. Friedrich Nietzsche’s…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reason is not necessarily the means to the better life, or towards procuring ‘the good,’ from the view of these latter thinkers. It seems that Nietzsche would problematize the allegory of the den, in this respect, to no end. From a Nietzschean perspective, the relativity of our values, and the ways they merely reflect the power dynamics and social and political undercurrents of our age, begs the question of their effect on our reason (Nietzsche, 1989, p.46-47). The supposed ‘good’ or ‘moral worth’ of philosophical inquiry, implied by Plato in the allegory of the den, is something that Nietzsche would have to challenge.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 3) In the first essay of On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche’s central concern is the slave revolt in morality. In this paper, I argue that Nietzsche does not think Marx an example of the slave revolt in morality as Nietzsche’s view of the slave class is different to Marx’s view of the proletarians as well as their differing suggestions in terms of imaginary revenge and physical revolution. To begin with, Nietzsche explains in the first essay that master morality is one associated with the noble who are “the mighty, the high-placed and the high-minded” (Nietzsche, 11).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In between the tales of two important historical stories, there is one common relation, which is the demand for power without the cognizance of the importance of their consequences. In multiple scenarios, nefarious actions are taking place with malicious consequences. Throughout the past, history has a tendency to repeat itself in multitudinous ways. Actions threatening oodles of people and others promoting “Greater Good.” The circumstances of the incidents that occurred, don’t get acknowledged by the higher power and therefore the information is delineated to their supporters, which in return can cause hardship and misery.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They find it harder to make alliances and betray you.” (Farmer 63). Nietzsche’s philosophy is not only found through these characters, but also through everyday…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people from highest rank think they are the means and ends of the society. Nietzsche said that our character is influenced by the character of our ancestors. Some people are naturally noble and as their ancestors was. In this chapter, he further said that language is the means of expression that everyone understands in…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche teaches the readers that the priestly sets of morals has reversed the morals of the previous knightly set of morals, and that mankind should revert back to the knightly set of morals. An example of how Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals is theoretical is demonstrated through the quote, “It was the Jews who, with awe-inspiring consistency, dared to invert the aristocratic value-equation (good…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, due to social beliefs that alter the perspectives of oppressors and the oppressed, it becomes difficult to champion for morality. In the case of Friedrich Nietzsche, he argues that morality is a questionable human virtue that has no objective place in reality. Friedrich Nietzsche considers morality to be a societal constructions that focuses on achieving ideals believe to be “noble” by the higher class at the expense of those at the bottom of the class. More importantly, he points out that Morality ignores the relatives experiences and perspectives which inform the reality of individuals. It chooses to create one form of reality for the whole society, a factor that contribute to most of the social shortcomings of society.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche is also expressing the necessity that humanity must stand on its own without the support of faith and power from above. This new world with god faces new problems such as money that replaces the position of a god in our lives. These new forces have provided a new faith for…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche sets out to find what the Judeo-Christian mentality perceives as moral. Here we are presented with the difference of the noble and the non-noble as the dividing factor in early society. The noble was comprised of the naturally powerful warriors, lords, or as he later calls them “the birds of prey”. The noble people were the first to form moral values, which were simply reinstating their own ideals as a good thing to do, where anything that is not in unison with these ideals was naturally deemed to be bad. Usually when the noble considers strength to be a good quality, being weak is immediately seen as a bad thing.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The author Friedrich Nietzsche in his text (“The Madman”, 1882) used a narrative to prove a point. To be more specific he wanted to show or demonstrate to people how bad was the status of religion and of faith in Europe around his time (1882-1887) the time when he was publishing “The Gay Science”. The story started with a man who is described as a “madman”. The madman begins by entering a marketplace and starts to shout loudly “I seek God! I seek God!”…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Morality as Anti-Nature, Friedrich Nietzsche reveals his philosophical opinion on the use of morals while living and making decisions, rather than relying on innate reasoning. Nietzsche supposes morals and religion are in opposition to life’s passions. “But an attack on the roots of passion means an attack on the roots of life: the practice of the church is hostile to life.” (Nietzsche 348) His immoral views disagree with the “anti-natural morality” reared by the church and Christianity.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He did not realize either, that his critics would bring to light an intrinsically undercover value system. After rejecting, suffering diseases and having loss of his family, Nietzsche realized that the 19th European time surrounding society was using moral for its own convenience. Those individuals suffering in pain had to ‘man it up’ and continue struggling for the sake of a hypocritical society. Nietzsche describes morality as a battle between the strong to keep control over the weak, and the organized weak against the strong. His concept of…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics