Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Ethics

Superior Essays
Austin Parker
Intro to Ethics, Dr. Rigoni
5/4/2015

Introduction
Ethics plays a huge role in the interaction of human beings on a daily basis. It allows people to choose between right and wrong behaviors in order to create a morally upright society. For this reason, several ethical theories exist to help understand the relationship between people. A majority of well-known philosophers such as Immanuel Kant, Bentham, Stuart Mill, and Gauthier have made great contributions to sociology by theories such as deontology, utilitarianism, and social contact theories. However, the deontological work by Immanuel Kant is the most favored compared to other moral frameworks. Its focus on duties of individuals rather than consequences has my preference.
…show more content…
This is why he centered his theory of deontology on the human’s ability to reason. On the contrary, Kant’s deontology doesn’t account for one’s emotions, feelings, and consequences when deciphering the moral law or duty. The theory focuses on the understood law that human beings should perform the right actions from thinking rationally. Deontological ethics sets appropriate guidelines to raise reasoning and encourage positive behavior. Kant’s deontology relies on the human will to classify the validity of their actions (Waluchow, 2003). Good human will is connected with positive actions in social settings and moral law. However, some factors will result in weak and irrational decisions that affect the efficiency of the decision making …show more content…
It applies to tall people and satisfies the standard human rights adopted globally. The world 's human rights are based on the proposed laws of deontological ethics (Mizzoni, 2010). Several philosophers have developed ethical theories, but few of them conform to human rights (Hinman, 2013). The majority violate the rights of an individual. Like the social contract theory, it characterized society based on class, culture, and race which does not conform to equality.
Reliability
Kant’s deontology is more reliable than that of other theories. It has the necessary guidelines with the primary goal of instilling a culture of moral obligation. The structure is effective since it creates an ongoing habit of good morals. Human reasoning over emotions and social situations curbs the urge to use bad behaviors. While the focus of utilitarianism on the consequences is not reliable compared to deontology. It allows people to disobey rules based on consequences, failing to embed moral virtues into our actions.
Evidence
Deontology has been big in the past compared to other ethical theories. For example, it defends human rights by forbidding infringement of the right to fair treatment. The utilitarianism view fails to respect the rights of individuals. It 's draw to consequences of actions makes it hard to keep the welfare, and interests of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Kant

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill and Kant Kant and Mill are two philosophers with differing ethical theories. The crux of the disagreement between these two philosophers is that they both disagree on the methods by which we should derive moral rules and guidelines. Specifically, which guidelines we should use in deciding what is ethical, and which justifications we should use for the evaluating moral value of actions? Kant’s deontological theory attempts to answer these questions through a sound reason based approach. The strength in Kant’s theory is that it rests on a foundation of consistent obligatory universal rules, with an emphasis on the intentions of the agent.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the principle of deontology, it is an “approach to ethics focused on duties and rules” (Rich, 2016). From this perspective, violations of duties and rules, or categorical imperatives, are unacceptable regardless of the anticipated outcomes (e.g. shooting an abducted passenger plane is always an immoral thing to do and it violates the moral norm to not kill others) (Gawronski, 2016 ). Kant proposed that people should follow a universal, unconditional framework of rules as a guide to know the rightness of actions and one’s moral duties (Rich,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, deontologism is an ideal/belief that pursues to form universal rules for the ethics of human action. Kant summarizes this viewpoint with a deontological method by forging two universal rules: “Act as though the maxim of your action were by your will to become a…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kantian Ethics theory is the deontological theory that will be utilized in dilemma mentioned above. Immanuel Kant argues that one should base morality on proper duty and proper motive. Kant has two major formulations to his theory, “Act only on that maxim that you can will as a universal law… [and] Always treat humanity, whether in your own person or that or another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.” (MacKinnon, p. 116, 2001).…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss Kant’s moral reasoning, both broadly and in terms of a case study, and elaborate on some issues with Kantian ethics. The core of Kant’s ideas on morality is his statement that "nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good without qualification, except a good will". He defines this good will as “the will which acts from freedom and respect for the moral law”, meaning that one must choose by their own volition to pursue morality. Kant believes the only purely good thing is this idea of good will. In saying this, Kant draws a line between good will and traits like happiness, wealth, and even health that are usually thought to be good.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The “summum bonum” is an ancient Latin expression which was introduced by the Roman philosopher Cicero, meaning “the highest good.” The old proverb is often used when answering the question of what makes for a meaningful life. In Immanuel Kant’s Religion Within the Boundaries of Bare Reason, he reasserts this “highest good” and describes it as “happiness proportioned to virtue.” Kantian philosophy rationally endorses the “highest good” of humanity, which cannot be fully attained in this world. This is an eternal good found in a “supremely powerful moral ruler capable of uniting virtue and happiness,” namely, God.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Code Of Ethics

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1) Part A) The following are Kant's important ideas about ethics. The first is the principle of Universality, which states that we must follow the rules of behavior, that we can apply universally to everyone. And the other is the logic or the reason determines the rules of ethical behavior, the actions are mostly good because they follow from the logic. (Gift of Fire-social, Legal and ethical issues for computing technology, pg no-29,1.4 Ethics.)…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand, Deontology, also known as Kantianism, is an ethical theory based in rationalism where the motives determine the ethical value of the act, not the consequences. In deontology, Kant suggests that there are universal ethical rules that are common sense and gathered through reason, not experience (Burkhardt and Nathaniel, 32; vol. 2). Therefore, the moral rules are applicable to everyone regardless of the situation. As a result, everyone who is a person has the right to equality, privacy, veracity, and freedom. Another important aspect of deontology is the idea of humans creating their own destinies and making their own decisions.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays