It would be when judges are chosen by citizens, not political parties and politicians; it would be a random picked group of citizens deciding, dominating the police, what they do, which activities they will do first, and which laws, crimes, etc. are to be the priority; the order of importance, and concern, such as traffic tickets being last and crime, criminals being # 1 on the list. It would be citizens, juries deciding guilt and innocence, and punishment, not politician laws, of how much, what kind of repercussions and punishment would be wanted.
Simply, the legal system, its parts, that a citizen group would over-see and manage, be the power over each activity of the legal system, and deciding, choosing how each part would do what needs …show more content…
those connected to the British, who were in power, controlling America, before 1776, obviously hated 1776 as it interrupted their leader-control of society. To this day leader-types, political parties, politicians, Special Interests, Lobbyists still hate 1776, hate what came from 1776: the Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation that kept the Declaration alive and 1776 in place.
The rock of 1776, the Articles of Confederation had a core objective, one guarantee: that a central authority would not be the power, that a federal govt. would be a lesser to the state governments. Federal politicians would not have the power to tell the states what to do, control the states or “We the People.” They could not force taxes, laws or anything else, unless they had our agreement, permission. The federal govt. could not force anything, policies and agendas, nor opinions.
There were many who did not want to revolt, did not want to lose their statute, connections and unfair advantages they had with the British, to …show more content…
to the power of a central authority, hence a new royalty, governmental royalty. Thus the scheming began to get the federal govt. power, ability, bring back a powerful, dominant central authority.
Thus began the scheming to get rid of The Articles by federal politicians and their big money friends, for a replacement, which came to be the Constitution. While the Constitution does not give full power to the feds, it did one big thing: killed and The Articles, and made the state governments peons to the federal govt., which was the only reason for the Constitution.
That is the reason why ‘they,’ federal politicians wanted to kill The Articles, as that would be the only way to destroy 1776, reverse America becoming “of, by and for the people” and government being subservient to “of, by and for the people”
But still that lack of full power was needed as 1776 was still fresh in minds, and the federal politicians would have been tarred and feathered if they had tried to grab more power.
But that not having full power was an ulcerous grating on those federal politicians, and soon they came to hate the Constitution
Simply, the legal system, its parts, that a citizen group would over-see and manage, be the power over each activity of the legal system, and deciding, choosing how each part would do what needs …show more content…
those connected to the British, who were in power, controlling America, before 1776, obviously hated 1776 as it interrupted their leader-control of society. To this day leader-types, political parties, politicians, Special Interests, Lobbyists still hate 1776, hate what came from 1776: the Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation that kept the Declaration alive and 1776 in place.
The rock of 1776, the Articles of Confederation had a core objective, one guarantee: that a central authority would not be the power, that a federal govt. would be a lesser to the state governments. Federal politicians would not have the power to tell the states what to do, control the states or “We the People.” They could not force taxes, laws or anything else, unless they had our agreement, permission. The federal govt. could not force anything, policies and agendas, nor opinions.
There were many who did not want to revolt, did not want to lose their statute, connections and unfair advantages they had with the British, to …show more content…
to the power of a central authority, hence a new royalty, governmental royalty. Thus the scheming began to get the federal govt. power, ability, bring back a powerful, dominant central authority.
Thus began the scheming to get rid of The Articles by federal politicians and their big money friends, for a replacement, which came to be the Constitution. While the Constitution does not give full power to the feds, it did one big thing: killed and The Articles, and made the state governments peons to the federal govt., which was the only reason for the Constitution.
That is the reason why ‘they,’ federal politicians wanted to kill The Articles, as that would be the only way to destroy 1776, reverse America becoming “of, by and for the people” and government being subservient to “of, by and for the people”
But still that lack of full power was needed as 1776 was still fresh in minds, and the federal politicians would have been tarred and feathered if they had tried to grab more power.
But that not having full power was an ulcerous grating on those federal politicians, and soon they came to hate the Constitution